|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Mar-23-06 | | ChessPieceFace: as someone who sometimes falls into the trap of disrespecting my own pawns, this game is a pretty amazing reminder of why not to do that! but (and here's where i may get laughed at), why isn't it a draw by repetition between moves 53-57? |
 |
Mar-23-06
 | | YouRang: <Jim Bartle><What's even more interesting is that they're all in their original files, no doubled pawns.> If I were a nit-picker, I would point out that black's b and c pawns switched files, so they're not really on their original files. Of course, nobody likes a nit-picker. ;-) |
|
| Mar-23-06 | | Eficko: "but (and here's where i may get laughed at), why isn't it a draw by repetition between moves 53-57?" it wasnt the same pos 3 times, on the third move bacrot moves to ke6. Cool game btw :). |
|
Mar-23-06
| | YouRang: <Eficko> Actually, if you look again, you'll see that between moves 53-57, there was no position that was thrice repeated. (And even if there had been, it doesn't automatically result in a draw -- one of the players must claim it.) |
|
| Mar-23-06 | | Eficko: <YouRang>"<Eficko> Actually, if you look again, you'll see that between moves 53-57, there was no position that was thrice repeated.
(And even if there had been, it doesn't automatically result in a draw -- one of the players must claim it." i know..... i was the one telling chesspieceface that so please look again, youll see that. i also know the rules fine and im pretty sure judit would of claimed it.... |
|
| Mar-23-06 | | ChessPieceFace: getting laughed at i expected, starting a fight i did not! haha. it confused me a bit, i guess it was 2.5 moves repeated. also i was pretty sure that since no one had previously mentioned it, i was wrong. the chances of me spotting something that none of you all did is pretty remote. |
|
Mar-23-06
 | | Phony Benoni: Kavalek's "Immortal Pawn" game was against Gufeld. It's in the database, but I don't know how to do a direct link. |
|
Mar-23-06
| | YouRang: <Eficko> Oops! My apologies -- I clearly didn't read your post carefully. |
|
Mar-23-06
 | | Bobwhoosta: Funny, in the final position black has a pawn promotion no matter which way you flip the board. This type of game is something I need to study more, a pure positional build up off of a piece sacrifice. I would've never seen the sacrifice... |
|
| Mar-23-06 | | GilHamilton: <Phony Benoni> Gufeld vs Kavalek, 1962 ? |
|
| Mar-25-06 | | Eficko: <YouRang> no probs. i didnt quote it properly with his name in the first place. |
|
Oct-06-06
 | | kevin86: I think that the chain after move fifty is even more impressive:a6-d3-h7 |
|
Jun-12-07
 | | notyetagm: Position after 52 ... c3-c2
click for larger viewWow. Never anything like this before or since. |
|
| Jun-13-07 | | sanyas: <Bobwhoosta> Not if you flip it sideways... |
|
Nov-27-07
 | | FSR: Poor Judit must have felt sick getting rolled by all those pawns. In such circumstances I always think of something IM Julio Kaplan once wrote (I think about a game where Lein had sacked a rook for five pawns and rolled them down the board much as Bacrot did here): "reminds me of a movie I saw once about Brazilian army ants." |
|
| Feb-28-08 | | D.Observer: Eight on three. Can't withstand it. |
|
| Dec-17-08 | | WhiteRook48: Polgar loses to Bacrot???? How did that happen? |
|
| Dec-17-08 | | chessamateur: <WhiteRook48> Bacrot was a young and upcoming star at this time and went on to become an elite GM. |
|
Jan-23-09
 | | GrahamClayton: <notyetagm>Never anything like this before or since. <notyetagm>,
According to Irving Chernev's "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess" (Dover, 1974}, the game du Mont-Gosling, London 1943 reached the following position after 31.e5 
click for larger viewThe c7-d6-e5-f4-g3-h2 pawn chain equals the chain in the Polgar v Bacrot game. |
|
| Jan-23-09 | | WhiteRook48: how come Black kept all the pawns for so long? |
|
| Jan-30-09 | | WhiteRook48: and it was a bit funny. |
|
| Oct-27-09 | | WhiteRook48: who won that game? |
|
Aug-12-12
 | | Abdel Irada: White was probably already lost by that time, but I think 38.  c6 was fatal. She had an opportunity to pick off the a-pawn and begin demolishing Black's queenside pawn chain, but instead chose to pursue a doomed attack. This is where my old friend/opponent Kermit Norris would have croaked, "No pawn respect!" |
|
| Apr-27-13 | | Rookiepawn: I think maybe 28. f4 was a poor move since it allows the Black e pawn to get pass and backed. 28.f3 seems to me as more cautious in order to stop the pawn avalanche. |
|
Apr-27-13
 | | thegoodanarchist: By move 49 Bacrot's pawn chain looks better than anything I've ever seen on a chess board. He still has all 8 and couldn't be more well placed |
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
sac: 19...Nexd5