chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Johann Jacob Loewenthal vs Howard Staunton
Birmingham (1858), Birmingham ENG, rd 2, Aug-??
Scandinavian Defense: Modern Variation (B01)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Loewenthal/Staunton games
sac: 16.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-10-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: 16. Bxh7+! Works best for the Open King!
Nov-15-05  JYMMI: interesting... 2 knights for 1 bishop a great trade of pieces... for black but white won... great
May-10-17  Sally Simpson: A game that changed the the course of Chess History.

This game and Staunton vs Loewenthal, 1858 were the reason why Staunton never played Morphy.

Staunton was going to use Birmingham as practice to get his eye in for the Morphy match.

Löwenthal had just been walloped by Morphy 9-3. and now Löwenthal takes Staunton 2-0.

It would have been just too embarrassing and given his ever growing number of enemies something to gloriously gloat over.

Blame Löwenthal for the non-match. If he had beaten Morphy then Staunton would played or if he had lost 2-0 to Staunton then again it would have been match on.

May-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <Sally Simpson> Interesting take. Personally, I think Staunton would've played well vs Morphy. He would've lost, but given a reasonable amount of time to prepare, I don't think he would've been trounced. Thats just me and I'm a huge Morphy backer
May-11-17  Sally Simpson: Hi Morf,

I have a house full of chess books and they were mislaid all over the place.

I'm often seen wandering from room to room looking for a missing book which needs consulting. Recently I found a lost copy of 'The Chess Mind' by Abrahams behind the pop up toaster.

So in despair I recently organised my entire collection into one room and placed them in order in some freshly purchased library cabinets. (£10.00 job lot from a Charity Shop + £5.00 delivery fee.)

Games Collections, Openings, (I have 100's of these things), endings (very few) and Miscellaneous (where I discovered I have quite a few doublers including a tripler of 'Simple Chess' by Michael Stean. )

With everything neat and tidy I noticed I had a small gap amongst my 'Game Collections' which includes all World Championship matches. (1972 including doublers takes up an entire shelf).

So I'm shuffling the books about trying to fill the gap and I attempt to squeeze Part II of 'My Great Predecessors' the one covering Euwe to Tal into the gap when the side of the library case splits open (2nd hand junk) and I'm covered and smothered in a deluge of chess books.

If Staunton had played Morphy there would have been a book and it would have fitted perfectly into that gap.

I'm blaming Löwenthal.

(Staunton was the umpire for the Morphy - Löwenthal match. He could see at close quarters what he was up against. Staunton was a good player in his day but he had rested on his laurels for too long and it's not a crime to grow old.)

Book cabinet fixed with Bostic.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
Quarter-final
from Birmingham 1858 by MissScarlett


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC