Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Howard Staunton
Number of games in database: 321
Years covered: 1840 to 1866
Overall record: +181 -79 =40 (67.0%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      21 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

With the White pieces:
 King's Pawn Game (24) 
    C44 C40
 Giuoco Piano (20) 
    C53 C50 C54
 Evans Gambit (14) 
    C51 C52
 Bishop's Opening (11) 
    C23 C24
 King's Gambit Accepted (7) 
    C37 C38
 Ruy Lopez (7) 
    C77 C65 C60
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (41) 
    B20 B21 B40 B32 B44
 King's Pawn Game (26) 
    C44 C20 C40
 Giuoco Piano (23) 
    C53 C50 C54
 Bishop's Opening (13) 
    C23 C24
 Queen's Gambit Declined (11) 
    D30 D35 D37
 King's Gambit Accepted (9) 
    C39 C33 C37
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Staunton vs Horwitz, 1851 1-0
   Staunton vs NN, 1855 1-0
   Cochrane vs Staunton, 1841 0-1
   Saint Amant vs Staunton, 1843 0-1
   Cochrane vs Staunton, 1842 0-1
   Staunton vs Anderssen, 1851 1-0
   NN vs Staunton, 1841 0-1
   Staunton vs Horwitz, 1846 1-0
   Staunton vs Saint Amant, 1843 1/2-1/2
   Von Der Lasa vs Staunton, 1853 0-1

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Staunton - Saint Amant (1843)
   London (1851)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Staunton & Kolisch best games by Gottschalk
   1 by gr2cae
   WCC Index [Staunton-Saint Amant 1843] by suenteus po 147
   against 1. e4 c5 by CAPRICORN
   WCC Index [Staunton-Horwitz 1846] by suenteus po 147
   Blunderchecked games I by nimh
   Selected 19th century games by atrifix
   pre-Steinitz Era1:1861 or before by Antiochus
   Chess Prehistory by Joe Stanley
   Staunton's games to use for GTM by davide2013
   Noted-n-Notable-Games of Morphy-n-Staunton by saveyougod

   H Kennedy vs H Buckle, 1846

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Howard Staunton
Search Google for Howard Staunton

(born 1810, died Jun-22-1874, 64 years old) United Kingdom

[what is this?]
Howard Staunton was born in Westmorland, Northern England. Learning the game in 1830, he took it up seriously in 1836 and by 1840 was among the world's best players.

In April 1843, after losing a short but hard-fought match to visiting Frenchman Pierre Charles Fournier de Saint Amant (+2 =1 -3), he issued a more formal challenge. This second match, in November-December 1843, was convincingly won by Staunton (+11 =4 -6) and broke the 100-year domination of the game by French players.

In the 1840s and 50s Staunton did a great deal for chess. He founded and edited "The Chess Player's Chronicle" (1841-1854), organized the first International tournament (the London (1851) knock-out format), made efforts to unify the laws of chess, wrote books and sponsored the design by Nathaniel Cook for chess pieces that has since become the standard pattern.

The only blotch on this splendid record was his continual evasion of a match with visiting American master Paul Morphy in 1858. Staunton died in London in 1874.

Notes: Howard Staunton played two consultation games with Paul Morphy, but was on the team of Staunton / Owen.

Consultation games: Anderssen / Horwitz / Kling vs Staunton / Boden / Kipping, 1857

Wikipedia article: Howard Staunton

 page 1 of 13; games 1-25 of 321  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Staunton vs Popert 1-019 1840 LondonC44 King's Pawn Game
2. Staunton vs Popert 0-127 1840 London mC00 French Defense
3. Staunton vs Popert 1-039 1840 LondonC23 Bishop's Opening
4. Popert vs Staunton 0-133 1840 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
5. Popert vs Staunton 1-038 1840 LondonB33 Sicilian
6. Popert vs Staunton ½-½56 1840 London mC45 Scotch Game
7. Staunton vs Popert 0-138 1840 LondonC02 French, Advance
8. Staunton vs NN 1-021 1840 ?C52 Evans Gambit
9. NN vs Staunton 0-129 1840 LondonC53 Giuoco Piano
10. NN vs Staunton 0-122 1841 LondonC33 King's Gambit Accepted
11. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-157 1841 London m1C50 Giuoco Piano
12. Staunton vs NN 1-022 1841 London simC23 Bishop's Opening
13. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-126 1841 London m1C02 French, Advance
14. Staunton vs NN 1-024 1841 London 5C37 King's Gambit Accepted
15. Staunton vs Cochrane 1-043 1841 London m1C40 King's Knight Opening
16. Zytogorski vs Staunton ½-½57 1841 London m (f7 &000 Chess variants
17. Staunton vs Popert 1-032 1841 LondonC53 Giuoco Piano
18. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-136 1841 London m1C44 King's Pawn Game
19. Staunton vs NN 1-038 1841 London simC44 King's Pawn Game
20. Staunton vs Cochrane 1-030 1841 London (England)C51 Evans Gambit
21. Cochrane vs Staunton 0-121 1841 London m1C44 King's Pawn Game
22. NN vs Staunton 1-027 1841 London 5C33 King's Gambit Accepted
23. Staunton vs Cochrane 1-039 1841 London m1C23 Bishop's Opening
24. Zytogorski vs Staunton 0-119 1841 London m (f7 &000 Chess variants
25. Popert vs Staunton 1-023 1841 LondonC02 French, Advance
 page 1 of 13; games 1-25 of 321  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Staunton wins | Staunton loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Who would have won a match between Staunton and Morphy? I can feel a bit of research coming on - something to keep my interest in chess active in 2013! What's sparked my attention is Ray Keene's article in today's (London) Times where he annotates a consultation game between Staunton and Owen (W) and Barnes and Morphy. He says it "indicates Morphy would have been the victor in such a contest". It would be good to get the game up on the chessgames site - anyone know how to do that?
Nov-26-12  thomastonk: <Dionysius1> What about the Philidor's Defence here: Staunton / Owen ?
Jan-04-13  IndigoViolet: All three volumes of Staunton's editions of Shakespeare are now online, courtesy of Google Books.

Volume 1:

Cambridge University Press reprinted <The Staunton Shakespeare 3 Volume Set> in 2009.

<First published between 1858 and 1860, this three-volume annotated edition of Shakespeare's works by Howard Staunton is based on the folio and quarto editions collated with the texts of later editors from Rowe to Dyce. Staunton, a chess genius as well as a highly regarded Shakespeare scholar, was known for his minimal yet sensible textual improvements and his familiarity with Elizabethan literature and language. His edition combines common sense with meticulous research, and it was regarded as a definitive resource in its day. Each play is accompanied by an introduction giving details of its original production and publication and the sources of its plot, critical commentary, and footnotes explaining terms and expressions. The books are generously illustrated with black-and-white illustrations by the prolific artist John Gilbert.>

Staunton's first-volume preface reveals that he played a small role in the dramatic uncovering of the diabolical forgeries of John Payne Collier:

Premium Chessgames Member
  northernfox: <IndigoViolet> Thanks for this information. I was previously unaware of Staunton's scholarly work on Shakespeare.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Nightsurfer: <Howard Staunton> - the only Englishman who has become (unofficial) World Champion of Chess between 1843 and 1851 - has got a colleague nowadays ... and that is Francis Bowers who is actually the 7 times (!!) World Champion of <Circular> Chess.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: Staunton was the best player in the 1840s. By the time Morphy came to Europe (about 1860), Staunton was over 50, and still strong but about 10-15 years past his peak. Anderssen was the best in Europe at that time and since Morphy beat him fairly easily there is no doubt who was the world's best at that time.

A great match would be Morphy vs Steinitz in the 1860s but unfortunately for chess Morphy was no longer competing.

Feb-13-13  mrbasso: Staunton was just a Patzer. Anderssen a
a strong chess player with bad openings. Due to his bad opening treatment he had no chance against Morphy. Of course Morphy would have crushed Staunton.
Feb-13-13  Poulsen: Actually Staunton was a very strong player at his best - maybe the strongest in world (but not uncontested).

Morphy would have had a hard time beating him, when he was at his best (roughly 15 years before Morphy came to Europe).

Morphy was arguable the best in world at his time, but none the less he is the most overrated player of all time.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <mrbasso: Staunton was just a Patzer....>

Not a mere patzer, but a Patzer-guess that represents a step up, or some such rot.

Your disrespect for greats both past and present is beyond the pale. Give lessons, do you?

Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: interestingly at the official opening of the world championship candidates tournament in london on thursday march 14 , the president of fide in a carefully scripted speech referred to staunton as "a world champion." as john saunders has pointed out, when the fide president speaks ex-cathedra he is the infallible Pope of chess. Many years ago I compared ( in an article for the Spectator I recall) the fide president to a mediaeval Pope and the world champion to the Holy Roman emperor. A good parallel wd be Pope Gregory VII and the Holy Roman emperor Henry IV.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: during the 1840's staunton crushed st amant, horwitz and harrwitz in matches which foreshadowed in length and format the world title contests of the 1950's - 2000 or so.staunton was evidently the dominating force in the chess world at that time and until 1851 by which time anderssen had clearly overtaken him. still, staunton cd certainly be considered the champion from 1843 to 1851, which puts him on a par with capablanca, petrosian and kramnik in terms of tenure at the top!
Apr-14-13  IndigoViolet: <How the [Staunton] Chess Set Got Its Look and Feel>

Apr-17-13  Dragi: With all respect to great master Staunton , he knew verywell why he avoided Morphy ...Just like Anderssen at his prime , he would be overrun by divine Paulie like some of the patzers from the local pub ...
Apr-20-13  Conrad93: Staunton, like Fischer, was a great chess player, but a terrible man.
Premium Chessgames Member
  talisman: when it came to Morphy, he sure knew how to duck.
Apr-20-13  Conrad93: He was busy at the time. Staunton considered everyone else inferior. That would include Morphy, so he probably assumed that it would be a waste of time to crush a weakling.
Apr-21-13  Conrad93: Also, Staunton was busy with a Shakespearean project at the time. He could not be bothered with a match.
Apr-21-13  Shams: <talisman> Howard the duck?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: G.H. Diggle, in his fine account of Staunton's 1843 match with St. Amant, attributes Staunton's spotty later results to a near-fatal bout of pneumonia in October 1844, which left him with a heart condition that seems to have worsened over the years. By 1853 he was begging off even casual games with his friend Von der Lasa, because of worry about heart problems. Diggle also believes his irascible behavior in his later years was in part due to health issues.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: His frequent opponent John Cochrane has 766 games in the database to Staunton's 326.
Dec-07-13  scheidt: The English Opening could be called the Staunton Opening as easily as the Petrov, Pirc and the Reti is called after those masters.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: ♔ Quote of the Day ♔

< "The habit of holding a Man in the hand, and moving it first to one square and then to another, in order to engage the assistance of the eye in deciding where it shall actually be placed, is not only annoying to the adversary but a practical infraction of the touch-and-move principle." >


They talked pretty differently back then.

Jan-02-14  thomastonk: <The study of openings is serviceable in forming a good player, but practice is indispensable - in other words, rules are of less value than experiments.> -- Howard Staunton, 1862.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: ♔ Quote of the Day ♔

< "To play with correctness and skill the ends of games, is an important but a rare accomplishment, except among the magnates of the game." >


Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Jon Crumiller, a major chess collector (and Kasparov's partner in N Short / R Vujatovic vs Kasparov / Crumiller, 2010), posted these three comments on Facebook:

<<<For any Staunton fans, here's something you might enjoy. In my research-obsessive way, I acquired all 1442 weekly editions of the Illustrated London News, 1845-1874, with Staunton's columns. Then I photographed/extracted them, keyworded them, and posted everything online for free access. All you need do is download an Excel spreadsheet that has URLs to every column. There is also a keyword column for filtering, so that you can quickly home in on any relevant topic. The spreadsheet is downloadable from here:>

One very interesting tidbit from Staunton's ILN columns. It's generally assumed that Staunton's first mention of Morphy is in his 1857-Oct-24 column, which mentions Morphy by name, but if you use the keyword column to filter for Morphy, you'll find a *much earlier* column from 1856-Nov-01 that clearly refers to Morphy, in his response to correspondent EBC. Give it a try, for filtering practice.>

I neglected to mention that he also replies to Charles Maurian in New Orleans, regarding Morphy, in that same early column. To filter, just go to the Keyword column (column B) and click on the little down-arrow, then "Text Filters...", "Contains", and then one or more keywords such as "Morphy".>

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. Don't post personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies