|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
| Feb-06-06 |
| Jim Bartle: And moreover, what about the KING's gambit? Where is the king sacked? |
 |
| Mar-06-06 |
| IMFSTJP: The authors of these gambit names should be sacked. |
|
Mar-06-06
 |
| norami: I remember seeing a game where White sacked five pieces without capturing any of Black's pieces. White was down to a Queen and Rook and Black had all seven pieces on the board! Alas, all those pieces didn't do Black any good, White's Queen and Rook forced a quick checkmate. |
|
Mar-06-06
 |
| TheAlchemist: Also, <aw1988> probably forgot, 24.R1a7 and 26.Qd5 both sacrifice+ the dark-squared Bishop |
|
| Mar-06-06 |
| aw1988: Oh yeah, fair point. |
|
| Mar-30-06 |
| Stelling: Has anyone seen a comented version of this game ?? I'd appreciate if I could be pointed to this game analisys. |
|
| Mar-30-06 |
| Jim Bartle: Don't know what kind of web presence Informant has, or whether you have access to old Informants, but this game was #620 of volume 59. |
|
| Mar-30-06 |
| Stelling: Thanks a lot Jim!
I just found Serper's comments on the game. |
|
| Mar-30-06 |
| Jim Bartle: Stelling: If Serper actually claims to understand this game, I swear he must be lying... |
|
| Apr-06-06 |
| Stelling: I don't dispute that Jim but I'm sure Serper got it better after the fact. ;) I can send you his analisys, if you want. |
|
Jul-24-06
 |
| Phony Benoni: I think that a game like this where at least one of each type of piece is sacrificed should be called a "smorgasbord". |
|
Jul-27-06
|
| Phony Benoni: Serper published notes to this in Blitz Chess for Spring, 2000. He mentions one variation that is worth looking at: 21...Qb7? 22.c6 Qb8 23.b6, producing this position:
click for larger view
This does not seem to be a pleasant position for Black. Serper's comment was: "When I found this position in my calculations, I already knew that this might be special." |
|
| Jun-11-07 |
| Pennypacker: I'm reading Watsons "Chess strategy in action" right now and came upon this beauty. What a game! |
|
Jul-07-07
 |
| ketchuplover: Do u remember who,when,and where? |
|
| Sep-09-08 |
| Katu: This is awesome! |
|
| Oct-12-08 |
| Amulet: This is a marvelous game!
I have a question though.
How would classify this game on white's point of view , a positional or tactical game, |
|
| Jan-09-09 |
| WhiteRook48: all these sacs... with all the sacs, you'd wonder where Serper got all these ideas from... |
|
| Feb-15-09 |
| WhiteRook48: this is probably a purely tactical game |
|
| Feb-26-09 |
| WhiteRook48: 41. Qxe7+ is technically not a sacrifice |
|
| Mar-18-09 |
| WhiteRook48: I wonder if Serper knew what he was doing |
|
| May-25-09 |
| Verklarte Nacht: I was looking at 24 ... fxe3, and white has the very pretty 25 Re7+ Kd8 26 Qxb4 exf2+ 27 Kxf2 Nd7 28 Qa5+ Nb6 29 Qxb6+ Qxb6 30 cxb6 followed by b7 and bxc8Q# |
|
| Jul-24-09 |
| deadlysin: he sacrificed all of his pieces! |
|
| Aug-05-09 |
| WhiteRook48: are they sound? |
|
| Aug-30-09 |
| gochess2009: Of course Serper couldn't have calculated all the variations of all the sacs. No one could do that. He just used his GM intuition and decided that the 2-3 passed pawns on the 6th would be good enough compensation for the 2 pieces + the exchange. Impressive game. |
|
| Nov-06-09 |
| timothee3331: Impressive! Wonderful! Fantastic!
WHO can now imagine chess is a sport or a game? WHO can possibly think it is exhausted?
NO, new possibilities are discovered, and that makes chess one of the greatest arts never invented! |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
sac: 17.Nd5