chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Vladimir Kramnik vs Junior (Computer)
SuperGM (2000), Dortmund GER, rd 5, Jul-12
Queen Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack (D00)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 36 times; par: 56 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 2,910 more games of Kramnik
sac: 30.Qxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-20-04  azaris: Fantastic demonstration from Kramnik! After 14. ♕h2 Black has nothing to do so Junior first shuffles the king, throws away the outposted knight and then gobbles the offered pawn, unleashing a massive attack down the h-file. Score one for the humans.
Jul-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Too bad Jr. did not allow 33...Bxg5 34.Rc7. Its kind of pretty White rook has the bishop and knight both on a leash.
Sep-03-04  Knight13: Kramnik knows that 1.d5 2.e3 3.f4 is a good way to beat computer. If the black King Castle king side, he pushes pawn on the kig side. I always do that to beat my computer. Good game.
Sep-03-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I have noticed that if you don't castle it confuses computers; they don't seem to know what to do.

If you notice, Kramnik plays the fairly late 21.0-0-0, and only then does Junior play 21...a5 and 22...b5. The game is over by then!

Sep-04-04  Mostolesdude: I never thought about that offramp, I have to try it against my program ;)
Jun-09-05  acdc: <<offramp>: I have noticed that if you don't castle it confuses computers; they don't seem to know what to do. If you notice, Kramnik plays the fairly late 21.0-0-0, and only then does Junior play 21...a5 and 22...b5. The game is over by then!>

Interesting anti-computer idea. I will try that too. What do you think the reason for this oddity is? Does the computer get confused because it does not know which side of the board to commit its pieces to?

Jun-09-05  Medusa: I agree with the idea of avoid castling, see this other game

Kasparov vs X3D Fritz, 2003

Jul-12-05  fgh: "Junior Kramnik". Serious pun potential.
Jul-12-05  sharpnova: <acdc> i believe that is the correct reason. it is why i try to delay castling as long as possible against computers..
Aug-29-05  SnoopDogg: Kingside attacks are very difficult even today to defend for computers. This is a clear example.
Sep-15-05  Runemaster: I seem to remember somewhere on this site discussion of a player (not Arno Nickel) who claimed excellent results against computers with the sort of technique we see here from Kramnik.

Computers seem to find it hard to visualise the consequences of allowing the 'h' file to be opened onto their castled king, even if they gain a piece by doing so. The mating attack is evidently beyond their 'horizon', although perhaps now the strongest computers like Hydra don't have these sorts of weaknesses.

Apr-13-07  argishti: What a sharp game by kramnik!! he crushed the machine.
May-28-09  WhiteRook48: very well played by Kramnik
Jun-10-09  SirChrislov: <Runemaster post from '05>:

I think you're reffering to: Ernest F Pecci

Jun-10-09  SirChrislov: Pecci, in his book 'A psychiatrist matches wits with fritz' refers to this set-up with 4.f4 as the "barrage position." quite effective.
Jun-10-09  Kinghunt: This is just the Stonewall. It worked well enough here, but overall I don't think it's suitable for high level play. I don't think you would ever find this played in say, a world championship match.
Aug-04-09  WhiteRook48: 2 e3 was kind of stupid
Mar-24-10  birthtimes: Why not play this in a world championship match?! A human would most likely not defend as well as a strong computer...and probably not many grandmasters have read Pecci's book, except Kasparov...
Mar-24-10  Alphastar: <birthtimes> because the computer totally misplayed the (late) opening in this game, by castling kingside and then locking the center completely, thus inviting a huge kingside attack by white. In fact I would say that after 10. Rg1, the position is already won for white in a strategic sense.

Even a master wouldn't make such large positional mistakes in the opening.. And this is ofcourse a typical anti-computer opening.

Mar-24-10  birthtimes: Yes, this is a typical anti-computer opening, however, if Black, a human, does play the natural and normal book move ...c5, I don't think it would be particularly wise to also castle long, especially if one additionally wants to exchange the pawn on c5 for the d4 pawn.

Even more critical, is that in this database, there are only 28 games listed from 1893-2008, after 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. f4!

So this suggests that there just haven't been enough games played by humans to really evaluate how good of a strategy that these anti-computer moves would be when played solely by humans.

Perhaps another Bronstein will soon appear on the horizon, and after reading Dr. Pecci's book, and studying this game by Kramnik and similar ones by Kasparov, will be able to adapt them not only to computer logic, but also to human logic...

Mar-24-10  birthtimes: Here is another human vs. computer Stonewall game that is played more "humanly" by the computer, and yet eventually White's kingside attack breaks through again to victory...

Yusupov vs REBEL, 1997

Mar-25-10  birthtimes: And here's yet another famous game of grandmaster vs. machine in a Bird/Stonewall type setup with wonderful annotations and revealing glimpses into a grandmaster's mind...

B Alterman vs Deep Fritz, 2000

Jul-26-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  juan31: Buena onda que un Gran Maestro gane a un programa, quiere decir que a pesar que el programa pueda "pensar" miles de jugadas en segundos, el cerebro de un Maestro sigue siendo superior Gracias Maestro Kramnik
Jun-23-17  Nova: Is this Kramnik's famous Stonewall beats computer game??

If so this should be a GOTD! Pun suggestions? "Stonewall Kramnik"

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
GM vs Computer
by larrewl
earmanhomimii's favorite games
by earmanhomimii
Stonewall Attack, Stonewall Defense (D00) 1-0 Triple on h-file
from Comp Chomps, Chumps & Challenges CageFredthebear by fredthebear
Kramnik's anti-computer strategy short circuits Deep Junior
from Uncommon Openings by BishopofBlunder
Kramnik's kingside pressure: inflate to 60 PSI.
from Sneaky's Scrapbook by Sneaky
D00 0-1
by CAPRICORN
Computer - GM games 1963-2002
by biglo
Round Five, Game #22
from Dortmund Sparkassen 2000 by suenteus po 147
d line
by Tim Walsh
Nice games and Masterpieces
by Queens Gambit
vikinx's favorite games
by vikinx
Stonewall Attack, Stonewall Defense (D00) 1-0 Triple on h-file
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
The Stonewall is a good anti-computer strategy.
from London Bridges Fredthebear Crossed by fredthebear
QUIQUE COLLECCION
by genie9
Black's extra pawn did not stop White!
from Material Imbalances by vikinx
something to think about
by tldr3
maxruen's favorite games
by maxruen
Stonewall Attack, Stonewall Defense (D00) 1-0 Triple on h-file
from Walls, Nests and Feathered Friends by fredthebear
The d line Compiled by Tim Walsh
by fredthebear
Queen Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack
from adichess' A00-D09 by adichess
plus 1 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC