chessgames.com

Kramnik 
Photograph copyright © 2007 Milan Kovacs (www.milankovacs.com)  
Vladimir Kramnik
Number of games in database: 2,355
Years covered: 1984 to 2013
Last FIDE rating: 2811
Overall record: +446 -124 =803 (61.7%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      982 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 English (108) 
    A15 A17 A14 A13 A16
 Sicilian (107) 
    B33 B30 B90 B52 B58
 King's Indian (101) 
    E97 E92 E94 E81 E86
 Slav (92) 
    D17 D15 D11 D12 D19
 Queen's Gambit Declined (89) 
    D37 D38 D31 D39 D30
 Grunfeld (71) 
    D85 D70 D87 D86 D82
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (254) 
    B33 B30 B31 B65 B57
 Petrov (102) 
    C42 C43
 Semi-Slav (100) 
    D45 D47 D43 D44 D46
 Ruy Lopez (99) 
    C67 C65 C88 C78 C84
 Queen's Gambit Declined (67) 
    D37 D38 D30 D39 D31
 Nimzo Indian (62) 
    E32 E34 E46 E20 E58
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Kramnik vs Leko, 2004 1-0
   Kasparov vs Kramnik, 1996 0-1
   Kramnik vs Kasparov, 1994 1-0
   Leko vs Kramnik, 2004 0-1
   Gelfand vs Kramnik, 1996 0-1
   Kramnik vs Kasparov, 2000 1-0
   Kramnik vs Morozevich, 2007 1-0
   Leko vs Kramnik, 2004 1/2-1/2
   Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006 0-1
   Kramnik vs Kasparov, 2001 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Kasparov-Kramnik World Championship Match (2000)
   Kramnik-Leko World Championship Match (2004)
   Kramnik-Topalov World Championship Match (2006)
   FIDE World Championship Tournament (2007)
   Anand-Kramnik World Championship Match (2008)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Match Kramnik! by amadeus
   Kramnik on a King Hunt & vs the World Champions by visayanbraindoctor
   Vladimir Kramnik's Best Games by KingG
   Vladimir Kramnik - Immortal masterpieces by Karpova
   Some interesting games by Kramnik by fgh
   Guess-the-Move Chess: 1990-1999 (Part 3) by Anatoly21
   Guess-the-Move Chess: 2000-2010 (Part 3) by Anatoly21
   Volodya versus Vesko by Resignation Trap
   Kramnik with Berlin Wall by tesasembiring by tesasembiring
   Book of Samurai's favorite games 6 by Book of Samurai
   Kramnik & Carlsen play the Catalan by suenteus po 147
   Kramnik g3 by Jason Harris
   Kramnik! by larrewl
   Alluring Kramnik games by positionalbrilliancy

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Vladimir Kramnik
Search Google for Vladimir Kramnik
FIDE player card for Vladimir Kramnik


VLADIMIR KRAMNIK
(born Jun-25-1975) Russia

[what is this?]
Former World Champion Vladimir Borisovich Kramnik was born in Tuapse, on the shores of the Black Sea, on June 25, 1975. As a child, Vladimir Kramnik studied in the chess school established by Mikhail Botvinnik. In 2000 he won the Classical World Championship from Garry Kasparov and then won the unified title when he defeated Veselin Topalov in 2006. he relinquished the title in 2007 to the incumbent World Champion, Viswanathan Anand.

Championships

<Age> In 1991 he won the World Under 18 Championship in Guarapuava, Brazil.

<National> He won the 1990 Russian Championship in Kuibyshev, Russia.

<World> Kramnik’s early attempts at storming the citadel of the World Championship met with mixed results. In 1994, he lost a Candidates quarter finals match for the PCA championship to Gata Kamsky by 1˝-4˝, and a few months later he lost a Candidates semi-finals match for the FIDE championship to Boris Gelfand by 3˝-4˝. In 1998, Kramnik was defeated by Alexey Shirov by 3˝-5˝ in the Candidates match held in Cazorla to determine the right to play Garry Kasparov for the Classical World Chess Championship. In 1999, Kramnik lost in the quarterfinals of the FIDE knockout championship in Las Vegas to Michael Adams by 2-4, including the 4 game rapid play-off.

Although Shirov had defeated Kramnik for the right to challenge Kasparov, suitable sponsorship was not found for a Kasparov-Shirov match, and it never took place. In 2000, however, sponsorship became available for a Kasparov-Kramnik match instead. This meant that Kramnik was the first player since 1935 - when Alexander Alekhine selected Max Euwe as his challenger - to play a world championship match without qualifying. In 2000 Kramnik reached the pinnacle by defeating long-time champion Kasparov for the World Championship in London by the score of 8˝ to 6˝ (+2 =13 -0) without losing a game, becoming the next Classical World Champion in the line that started from Wilhelm Steinitz. It was the first time since the Lasker-Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) that the defending champion had lost a match without winning a game and it was also the first time Kasparov had been beaten in a World Championship match. Kasparov said of Kramnik that: <”He is the hardest player to beat in the world.”>

In 2004, Kramnik successfully defended his title as Classical World Chess Champion against challenger Peter Leko at Brissago, Switzerland, by drawing the Kramnik-Leko World Championship Match (2004) in the last game. Lékó was leading the 14-game match until the final game, which Kramnik won, thus forcing a 7 - 7 draw and ensuring that Kramnik remained world champion. Because of the drawn result, the prize fund of 1 million Swiss francs was split between the two players.

Kramnik refused to participate at the FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005), but indicated his willingness to play a match against the winner to unify the world championship. His next title defence in 2006, therefore, was a reunification match with the new FIDE world title holder from the 2005 tournament, Veselin Topalov. The $1 million Kramnik-Topalov World Championship Match (2006) was played in Elista, Kalmykia from September 21 to October 13 and after controversially forfeiting the fifth game, Kramnik won the rapid game playoff by 2˝ -1˝ after the classical games were tied 6-6, thereby becoming the first undisputed unified World Chess Champion since the 1993 split. In the following year, Kramnik lost the unified World Champion title when he finished second to Viswanathan Anand at the Mexico City FIDE World Championship Tournament (2007). In October 2008, Kramnik exercised his entitlement to a rematch as a challenger to World Champion Anand in Bonn, Germany, but lost the Anand-Kramnik World Championship Match (2008) match by 4˝ to 6˝ (+1 =7 -3).

Kramnik's tournament performances in 2009 (see below) raised his rating (average of July 2009 and January 2010 ratings) sufficiently to qualify him for the World Championship Candidates (2011). In the first round he beat Teimour Radjabov by the narrowest of margins*: after tieing the classical games 2-2 (+0 =4 -0), and the rapid games 2-2 (+0 =4 -0), he won the blitz playoff by 2.5-1.5 (+2 =1 -1) to move to the semi final match against Alexander Grischuk, which he lost 1.5-0.5 (=1 -1) in the blitz tiebreaker after he drew the classical games 2-2 (+0 -0 =4) and the rapid games 2-2 (+0 -0 =4), thereby eliminating him from the contest. Participating in the World Championship Candidates (2013) on the basis of his rating, Kramnik came =1st with Magnus Carlsen on 8.5/13 after both lost their last round games. As the first tiebreaker (individual score against the other player in the tournament) left them level, the second tiebreaker (most number of wins in the tournament) relegated Kramnik to 2nd place due to scoring 4 wins to Carlsen's 5.

Kramnik is eligible to contest the World Cup 2013, and if he retains his rating in the top 3, could be seeded directly into the next Candidates Tournament in 2014.

Tournaments

Kramnik won Chalkidiki 1992 with 7.5/11, and in 1993, he played in Linares, finishing fifth and defeating the then world number three, Vassily Ivanchuk. Following some solid results in the interim which resulted in him winning the 1994 PCA Intel Grand Prix, major tournament triumphs were soon to follow, such as Dortmund 1995, Horgen 1995, Belgrade 1995, =1st in Dos Hermanas in 1996 and 1997, =1st in Tilburg 1997 (8/11). Dortmund became a favourite stop, as Kramnik has gone on to win nine more times in 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, Dortmund Sparkassen (2006), Dortmund (2007), Dortmund (2009) and Dortmund (2011), as either equal or clear first; in the 2011 edition of the event he won by 1.5 points despite losing in the last round. In 2000 Kramnik won his first Linares tournament, completing his set of victories in all three of chess's "triple crown" events: Corus, Linares, and Dortmund. Kramnik later captured additional Linares victories in XX Ciudad de Linares (2003) (shared) and 21st Linares (2004) (outright). He won the Tal Memorial (2007) with 6.5/9, 1.5 ahead of Shirov. Kramnik had exceptionally good results in 2009, winning once again in Dortmund and then winning the Category 21 (average ELO = 2763) Tal Memorial (2009) in Moscow with 6/9 and a TPR of 2883. At the time, the average ELO rating of the field made it the strongest tournament in history. He also participated in the London Chess Classic (2009) in December, finishing second to Magnus Carlsen. These magnificent results qualified him for the 2011 Candidates on the basis of his boosted ratings. Kramnik began 2010 at Corus (2010) in the Netherlands, during which he defeated new world number-one Carlsen with the Black pieces in their head-to-head encounter, ending Carlsen's 36-match unbeaten streak. A late loss to Anand knocked him out of first place, and Kramnik finished with 8/13, tying for second place with Shirov behind Carlsen's 8˝ points. He came 2nd in the preliminary Shanghai Masters (2010) to qualify for the Bilbao Masters (2010) against Carlsen and Anand, who had pre-qualified. He then won at Bilbao with +2 -0 =4 over world champion Anand, then-world number one Magnus Carlsen, and Shirov. The 2009 Tal Memorial and the Grand Slam Final at Bilbao were the most powerful tournaments (in ratings terms) ever staged. In late 2011, he easily won the 15th Unive (Crown Group) (2011) with 4.5/6 and a TPR of 2903 and finished the year with outright first at the London Chess Classic (2011) with +4 -0 =4 and a TPR of 2934, recovering ground lost following a mediocre performance in the Tal Memorial (2011) where he failed to win a game. In June 2012, he placed =4th at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2012), with 4.5/9 and in July 2012, =3rd (4th on tiebreak) at the category 19 Dortmund (2012) tournament. Kramnik finished 2012 with a surge, placing 2nd at the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Magnus Carlsen, scoring 6/8 (16 points in the 3-1-0 scoring system used in the event) and a TPR of 2937 to Carlsen's 2994. His final training preparation for the Candidates tournament in March at the category 21 Zurich Chess Challenge (2013), was less than completely successful in terms of results (2.5/6), drawing five and losing one to Anand, although it seemed to contribute to his game fitness at the Candidates as he placed second by the narrowest of margins, scoring equal to Carlsen who won the event and the right to challenge Anand for the World Championship.

Olympiads

Kramnik has won 3 team and 2 individual gold medals at the Olympiads as well as two team silvers. He played in the gold medal winning Russian teams in the Manila 1992, Moscow 1994 and Yerevan 1996 Olympiads, his first gold medal being awarded to him as an untitled 16 year old in 1992 when he scored eight wins, one draw, and no losses to record a remarkable TPR of 2958. In 1994, he came fifth on the second board with 8/11 and a 2727 TPR. In 1996, he scored a relatively meagre 4.5/9 on the second board. He did not participate in any more Olympiads until 37th Chess Olympiad (2006) in Turin, when he again won a gold medal with overall best performance on the top board with 6.5/9 (2847 TPR). In the Olympiad (2008) in Dresden, he scored 5/9 on top board and a 2735 TPR. Kramnik played board one for the silver medal winning Russian team in the Chess Olympiad (2010) in Khanty-Mansiysk, coming fifth with a scored of 5.5/9, winning 2 and drawing 7 with a TPR of 2794. At the Chess Olympiad (2012) held in Istanbul, he again played top board scoring 5/9 and coming 7th on that board, leading his team to another silver medal.

Matches

In 2004, he won a simul against the German National Team 2˝:1˝.

In October 2002, Kramnik played an eight game match against Deep Fritz (Computer) in the Brains in Bahrain (2002) match, drawing 4-4 after leading 3-1. In 2006 the German organization Universal Event Promotion (UEP) staged a return match of six games between Kramnik and Deep Fritz in Bonn, which Kramnik lost, +0 -2 =4.

In April 2012, Kramnik and Levon Aronian played, as part of their preparation for the 2012 Candidates Tournament, a six-game training match in Zurich. The Kramnik vs Aronian (2012) match was drawn 3-3 (+1 -1 =4).

Rapids

Kramnik has been an excellent and consistent performer at rapid and blindfold play. He won or shared the overall lead at Amber in 1996 (outright overall 1st), 1998 (=1st with Shirov with 15/22), 1999 Monaco (14˝/22), 2001 (=1st with Topalov with 15/22), 2004 (=1st with Morozevich with 14.5/22), and 2007 (outright overall first with 15˝/22). He also won the 2001 rapid play match against Lékó by 7-5, drew the 2001 rapid play Botvinnik Memorial match with Kasparov 3:3 and the 2001 rapid play match against Anand 5:5, lost the 2002 Match Advanced Chess Kramnik vs. Anand (Leon) 3˝:2˝, was runner up to Anand in the Cap D'Agde FRA (2003), won the 2009 Zurich Champions Rapid (2009) with 5/7 and shared 1st in the 2010 President's Cup in Baku with 5/7.

Ratings

<Classical> In January 1996, Kramnik became the world top rated player. Although he had the same FIDE rating as Kasparov (2775), Kramnik became number one by having played more games during the rating period in question. Kramnik became the youngest ever to reach world number-one, breaking Kasparov's record; this record would stand for 14 years until being broken by Magnus Carlsen in January 2010. He is the second of only six chess players to have reached a rating of 2800 (the first being Kasparov, followed by Anand, Topalov, Carlsen and Aronian). Ironically, during his reign as world champion, Kramnik never regained the world number-one ranking, doing so only in January 2008 after he had lost the title to Viswanathan Anand. As in 1996, Kramnik had the same FIDE rating as Anand (2799) but became number-one due to more games played within the rating period. Kramnik's 12 years between world-number one rankings is the longest since the inception of the FIDE ranking system in 1971.

Currently (May 2013), he has a rating of 2811 and is Russia's top player and number 3 in the world.

<Blitz> 2752 (world #16). He does not yet have a rapid rating.

Other

In 1995, Kramnik served as a second for Kasparov during the latter’s successful defence of his Classical World Chess Championship against Anand, and in an ironic counter point in 2010 he served as a second for Anand during the World Champion’s successful defence against Topalov.

Kramnik has a form of arthritis called ankylosing spondylitis. In January 2006, Kramnik announced that he would miss the Corus Wijk aan Zee (2006) to seek treatment for this condition. He returned from treatment in June 2006, playing in the 37th Chess Olympiad, winning gold by top scoring on the top board. Kramnik's performance in winning the Classical World Championship in 2000 won him the Chess Oscar for 2000, while his 2006 victory in the reunification match earned him the Chess Oscar for 2006.

On 30 December 2006 he married French journalist Marie-Laure Germon and they have a daughter, Daria, who was born 28 December 2008, and a son, Vadim, born 28 January 2013.

Sources and references Website: http://www.kramnik.com/; Biography: http://www.kramnik.com/eng/biograph...; Extended and candid interview with Kramnik by Vladislav Tkachiev in August 2011: http://whychess.org/node/1605; Live rating: http://www.2700chess.com/; * http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...; Wikipedia article: Kramnik


 page 1 of 95; games 1-25 of 2,355  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. A Oganian vs Kramnik 0-131 1984 BelorechenskB89 Sicilian
2. Kramnik vs Serdyukov 1-031 1984 BelorechenskB78 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack, 10.castle long
3. Remezov vs Kramnik  0-152 1985 KrasnodarB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
4. Kramnik vs Zhukov  1-038 1986 BelorechenskB43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3
5. Zaitsev vs Kramnik 0-149 1986 Team TournamentB83 Sicilian
6. Kramnik vs Mayorov  1-034 1987 GelendzhikC12 French, McCutcheon
7. Kramnik vs Chumachenko 1-032 1987 GelendzhikB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
8. Shilov vs Kramnik 0-137 1987 USSR Boys' ChampionshipB33 Sicilian
9. I Odesskij vs Kramnik 0-125 1987 URS-chT U16A52 Budapest Gambit
10. Kramnik vs Otsarev 1-018 1987 Baku TrainingB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
11. Kramnik vs Danislian  ½-½60 1988 Dimitrovgrad U18B15 Caro-Kann
12. Y Yakovich vs Kramnik 1-042 1988 USSRB40 Sicilian
13. Kramnik vs G Tunik 0-138 1989 Sochi (Russia)B46 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation
14. M Sorokin vs Kramnik ½-½52 1989 USSRA81 Dutch
15. M Tataev vs Kramnik 0-121 1989 It (open)A81 Dutch
16. Khenkin vs Kramnik ½-½17 1989 Sochi (Russia)D39 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin, Vienna Variation
17. Kramnik vs Gorelov ½-½18 1989 It (open)B33 Sicilian
18. Kramnik vs Lputian  ½-½52 1989 World Cup (Open)C07 French, Tarrasch
19. Kramnik vs R Shcherbakov ½-½35 1989 Sochi (Russia)B58 Sicilian
20. G Zaitshik vs Kramnik 0-140 1989 MoskvaA80 Dutch
21. E Moldobaev vs Kramnik  ½-½23 1989 It (open)A04 Reti Opening
22. G Kallai vs Kramnik ½-½22 1989 Sochi (Russia)A81 Dutch
23. Kramnik vs I Efimov ½-½34 1989 It (open)B33 Sicilian
24. Kramnik vs Gheorghiu ½-½9 1989 Cup World (open)B56 Sicilian
25. Kramnik vs B Podlesnik 1-037 1989 Sochi (Russia)B33 Sicilian
 page 1 of 95; games 1-25 of 2,355  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Kramnik wins | Kramnik loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1586 OF 1586 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-22-13  Zenagg: Let me preface my comment with a grounding fact; I am a bad player. That said, I've been watching world class chess since 1996.

I have watched the burning genius of Kasparov, the highly tactical Anand, and the cold sometimes lifeless play of Kramnik. He is and always has been a genius, but his style of chess seemed to hail the end of beautiful play (he seemed like a much stronger Leko), it was like computers and man were drawing the game out of art and pounding us forward into a small tunnel with a distant light, a light from a bonefire that would consume the upper elechons of chess and effectively kill my favorite pass time.

Years go by, and a new player emerges. He plays for long games like Fischer and goes from behind to winning and drawn to winning or lost to draw seeming at a whim. This new player dominates.

Now, Kramnik, who is (in my opinion) one of the most boring champions (during his reign) sees this new player winning games that fail the test of rigorous logic, he sees this new player win games from humans that any computer would have drawn, but he doesn't just see, oh no. He observes.

I believe Kramnik is playing the strongest chess of his life and from where I sit, the strongest chess in the world. Carlsen taught Kramnik to force members of the top thirty to prove that they can draw or win and boy did Kramnik learn.

I fully expect Kramnik's rating to keep increasing (I have no clue where he is in relation to his all time high but he will topple that, if he already hasn't, soon) and his number of decisive games will continue to increase.

The Kramnik of today, has the genius match preparation that allowed him to embarace Kasparov, great overall preparation, a precision endgame technique, the same old beautifully fluid logical approach to chess and now for the first time, a mindset to not just "play correct" but to "win from the first move".

Regardless of the many age-dooms-dayers, I believe the "rivarly of now" is Carlsen and Kramnik. If the candidates taught me anything it is that the super genius Carlsen still has a lot to learn from Kramnik and also that Kramnik, isn't just playing chess, he is still learning and improving.

What an exciting time!

Apr-22-13  Just Another Master: wow Kramnik layed another hot steaming pile of garbage.
May-05-13  solskytz: I'm now reading in Kevin Spraggett's blog, that it may well happen, that FIDE will award the match to Kramnik (against Anand) if Carlsen refuses to play in Chennai without due bidding process.

This will be a test of personal integrity for Kramnik. He should stand behind Carlsen and say "I lost the candidates fair and square (though on tie breaks only). It's Carlsen who should play the match, not me".

Will FIDE really award the match to Kramnik?

And would Kramnik then prove himself to be "the class act" that many people here think he is?

This is yet to be seen.

May-05-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  dx9293: <solskytz> I don't think it will come to this, but it wouldn't surprise me. Make no mistake: FIDE will try to put Carlsen in his place without batting an eye, if it has to. Look no further than April 3, 1975 and January 28, 1993 as evidence of this.

FIDE does not want to have one player with so much influence over the chess world, and Carlsen is heading in that direction. After their experiences with Fischer and Kasparov, they won't let it happen again. Carlsen had better realize that.

If Carlsen refuses to play, Kirsan will say "Next!"

Expect lawsuits though.

If Kramnik were to be awarded the match, I think he would take it.

Again, I don't think it would come to all of this and I expect the Anand-Carlsen match to happen.

Bottom line is, though: FIDE doesn't particularly care about public opinion. No matter how much FIDE gets criticized, it seems to grow stronger all the time.

May-05-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bridgeburner:

If, as the Norwegian Federation asserts, the award of the contract to Chennai without bidding is a breach of FIDE's own regulations, then it's likely this matter could be brought before the Court of Arbitration for Sport. As a member of the Olympics, FIDE would be required to recognize its jurisdiction.

May-07-13  Overgod: Vladimir Kramnik, you are a loser. I have lost a lot of respect for you, since you quietly decided to break your contract and not play in the Norway Supertournament.

We all know it's because he doesn't want to get crushed again by a resurgent Topalov.

What an irritating, sore loser this person is.

No wonder Kasparov hates him.

I am very disappointed.

May-07-13  Jim Bartle: "If this had happened in a Tennis game, he would forfeit the game and the fans would boo and he'd probably lose sponsorships."

Players drop out of tennis tournaments all the time.

May-07-13  jussu: <Overgod>, Kramnik didn't breach his contract, he asked the other part if it was okay to cancel his contract, and they didn't object. It's called agreement, in case you have never had one in your life.
May-07-13  Overgod: <Players drop out of tennis tournaments all the time.>

Correct. And there are harsh consequences as a result. For example, Nadal dropped several rankings because of his inactivity (something that isn't paralleled in the chess world).

Further, Nadal (and Djokovich, when he used to be a sore loser like this) were very unpopular with millions of fans, because of this behavior.

They were also unpopular with fellow professionals.

For example, when Nadal withdrew from much of the tour in 2010 (if memory serves) as well as the tour in 2012/2013 (about 7 months), he dropped from number 2 to number 6 in the world. This also has consequences in that for the upcoming French Open, he could face Djokovich as early as the quarter finals; if he'd been ranked higher, this wouldn't occur.

Kramnik doesn't have to suffer from these issues. He can just relax, breach his signed contracts (repeat: signed contracts), fly away on a holiday without worrying about losing rating points -- and these are important.

Quitting tournaments because of fatigue always was and always will be unpopular with everybody, not least the fans.

Kramnik should be forfeited from all his games and lose the consequent ranking status. Aronian is just as busy (if not more so) than Kramnik, and he doesn't breach his contracts because of a mediocre tournament or fatigue or other obligations (which he and he alone is responsible for in the first place!)

I really wanted to see Topalov and Kramnik play against each other again, (like many wish to see Federer play Nadal, for example); and this petulant, whining child has to run off for a holiday again. Topalov himself complained about this years ago, and I am sure this is one of the reasons Kasparov can't stand Kramnik.

When things heat up, Kramnik tucks his tail and runs. He preferred to play Leko instead of Kasparov; and he couldn't even defeat Leko! The match was a draw.

We all know that Topalov-Kramnik matches/games are always a joy to watch (with or without an in-form Topalov) and this loser ran away and deprived the fans of a significant chess spectacle!

Shame on Kramnik.

May-07-13  Jim Bartle: Nadal just withdrew? Wanted to lie on the beach?

Tennis has a completely different system, ratings based on performance in tournaments (what round you reach) while chess ratings are based on who you beat or lose to.

When a player misses a tournament he loses the points gained from the tournament the previous year. Aside from other reasons, the Norway tournament is being played for the first time, so that can't happen.

I really have no opinion about Kramnik dropping out, by the way.

May-07-13  Overgod: By the way, I want to use Tennis as an example as to why Chess is so lacking in audience and sponsorship. In a few words: Lack of professionalism.

Some of you might think "but if you are inactive in chess for a long time, say, 12 months, you lose rating points..."

But in Tennis, you lose points in every tournament you miss and you gain zero points if you have not participated in the tournament before.

This is perfectly logical and is one of many reasons why there is sponsorship in Tennis.

I don't think it's fair to argue that tennis is a different game and more popular with the masses.

I think the issue is more complicated. Tennis didn't always have this type of sponsorship, but with the establishment of the professional circuit and the grand slams, amongst other things, audiences and sponsors flocked to the game.

Look at what happened recently with Carlsen. FIDE just decided to sign a contract and there was no proper mediation between the parties.

Why should people take this type of "anything goes" behavior seriously?

Anand gets to sit on his title, play few tournaments and the tournaments he plays he finishes in the middle or near the bottom.

Who will take this rubbish seriously?

You might argue and say that there's no real world championship match in tennis. Well, tennis has the atp series masters and usually the player who wins that is also considered the best player in the world.

But the point here is not to construct a 1-1 comparison between chess and tennis. The main point is to state that tennis is a properly professionalized sport, where choosing to opt out of tournaments has consequences for your ranking and sponsorships, etc.

It is unprofessional that the world champion can sit on his throne for a year, play a few draws with the occasional win and loss (like Anand has) and simply pour most of his energy into preparing for his title defense.

This is unfair.

It makes chess seem like it's an unserious, grandfather game, where you can play or not play and breach your contracts like Kramnik, and suffer no consequences as a result.

Treat Carlsen like a clown and almost force him to play under conditions he never originally agreed to.

And this shameful behavior from Kramnik is just another reason why Chess is not taken seriously by the rest of the world...

May-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  dx9293: <Overgod> Get over yourself.

The Norway tournament let Kramnik out of his contract, which theye didn't have to do. End of story.

I'm sure Kramnik will play there next year.

May-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  AgentRgent: <dx9293: <Overgod> Get over yourself.> Oh! How we wish!
May-07-13  Illogic: <Overgod> What possesses you to write these stupid rants? What is the gain? I supposed I wasted a minute reading it, but you wasted far longer.
May-07-13  The End: I think some here believe people who matter read our comments and change :-)
May-07-13  jussu: Wow, that man is seriously obsessed.
May-07-13  WiseWizard: <Overgod> Millons of people watch tennis because it's easy and fun to watch.

These millions of spectators attract the sponsors.

When chess has more fans it will receive more sponsorship money.

It's a good thing that in 10-15 years the number of chess fans could grow exponentially thanks to Kasparov and others getting chess into schools. The masses will be educated on the game which is the first step. Hopefully by the time they have grown up FIDE will have figured out a clear, easy to follow, organized professional circuit, which is a marketable product.

May-07-13  Kaspablanca: Overgod: I think your Kramnik hatred is because he wont be playing Topalov in the Norway tournament and that`s the reason for your stupid and ridicolous rants, grow up boy.
May-07-13  Illogic: It's funny that at one point he calls Kramnik 'petulant' Overgod himself is the picture of petulance.
May-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  SatelliteDan: Kramnik is preparing for the World Championship in 2015.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 1586)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1586 OF 1586 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies