chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Vladimir Kramnik vs Garry Kasparov
"Gazza's Tears" (game of the day Nov-26-16)
Kasparov - Kramnik World Championship Match (2000)  ·  Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Bernstein Defense Except Gligoric System (E53)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 104 times; par: 26 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 121 more Kramnik/Kasparov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-25-14  Ulhumbrus: 7...cd?! moves a pawn in the opening and it frees Black's KB but also White's QB. On 7...Nc6 8 a3 Ba5 avoids conceding the bishop pair as in Spassky vs Fischer, 1972

8...dc?! moves again a pawn in the opening and concedes greater space to White

13...Be7 keeps the bishop pair but in a position where White is two moves ahead in development and can open the game

Sep-05-14  coldsweat: Thanks Piewalker for your interesting presentation.
Oct-19-14  Raj Dey: 14....Nf6?! not expected from Kasparov.
14.....Bf6 was better
Jun-19-15  Besheer: How come it Ends Like that ???? White position is better but where is the mate ???
Jul-09-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  EhsanBalani: I don't really understand why Garry played 14...Cf6 instead of 14...Ff6?
Oct-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sularus: <Besheer> White threatens QxR. After Kg8, white has Ne6 which threatens both QxR++ and Qxg7++.
Nov-26-15  st.dvy: Like any student of chess history, I admire Garry Kasparov for many, many reasons. I do, however believe that Kramnik has, somehow, managed to be held in less regard than any world champion. One statement that Kasparov made in an interview following the match will resonate for me forever, "I never thought he'd be so negative." Negative? Gary Kasparov is often regarded as the greatest attacking player of all time. Kramnik worked as his second for a while. Why should Kramnik play into Gary's strengths? Kramnik ressurected the Berlin Defense in the Ruy Lopez which Kasparov could not crack! One of the greatest Lopez players ever couldn't beat his second's archaic opening choice. Now the Berlin is still causing so much trouble for white at the highest levels, that many 1.e4 players are actually switching, and it's all thanks to what Kramnik accomplished in this match. There were only two wins in this match, both by Kramnik, with white, and he was very sharp... not negative, but sharp. After Gary's comments, I devoted an entire method of play devoted to eliminating the opponents choices and giving him what he'd least like to see, from both sides of the board. I call it 'Negachess'. Thanks Vlad!
Nov-27-15  andrewjsacks: 1. The match was not a full 24 games.
2. Kramnik was always a "difficult opponent" for Kasparov. 3. Kramnik should have agreed to a return match regardless of official bodies' stipulations, etc. 4. I contend Kramnik's resultant bad karma haunts him to this day.
Nov-29-15  st.dvy: Well... I'm sure that neither you nor I could say anything reasonable concerning Kramnik's emotional state or karma. 'Haunted' is such a strange idea is all of this. Kramnik won the title and continues to play. On a personal note, I was rooting for Gazza then and still do. Kasparov is to chess like G.W. Carver is to science: one of the most important figures ever! Kramnik has nothing to be ashamed of, he won the title without a single loss; while his contributions in The Berlin Defense still resonate. Give the player his due, right?
Dec-16-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <1. The match was not a full 24 games. > No, but it was longer than the quickfire world matches we've seen since.
Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Cricket going very badly. England won the toss but have slumped to 53-3.
Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I don't understand the pun.
Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  JimmyRockHound: There was an English footballer called Paul Gascoigne, who was nicknamed Gaza, and he quite regularly burst into tears.
Nov-26-16  cunctatorg: At this emblematic WCC match the chess world had two (or three) losses and just one gain: we lost the greater, perhaps, chess World Champion and we also lost one of the greatest chess players ever, namely Vladimir Kramnik; after this great match (where he had lost weight of 20 Kg!...) Vladimir Kramnik was never again the same great chess player... We also lost Kasparov's determination , attacking creativity and inventiveness and we gained instead a great variation, the "Berlin Wall"...
Nov-26-16  morfishine: <JimmyRockHound> Thank you for that explanation. Now, how is the game title a 'play-on-word' much less an actual pun? Was the match played on a soccer pitch? Did Kasparov dribble a soccer ball around while Kramnik pondered his next move? Was Gascoigne an honorary judge for the match? In the event of a tie, would the match be decided by free kicks?

Whats the connection?

Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <Gazza's Tears> Sounds painful.
Nov-26-16  moodini: <JimmyRockHound ...and he quite regularly burst into tears.>

This normally refers to the World Cup semi-final in 1990 against West Germany. Gazza got a yellow card and burst into tears when he realised that it meant he would miss the final due to suspension. In the end England lost on penalties and then everybody cried (apart from the West Germans who seemed reasonably pleased).

Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <Gascoigne > I thought that's a French waiter?
Nov-26-16  Cheapo by the Dozen: Kasparov should have played on two more moves, in the hope that Kramnik somehow would pick the wrong plan for the endgame.

Still, it's very unlikely that that would have worked out for him.

Nov-26-16  devere: 15...fxe6 looks like the fatal error. On 15...Rc7 Black has enough counter-play for the pawn.


click for larger view

Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robyn Hode: Kramnik will be remembered as the player who avoided a rematch with Kasparov--as Alekhine did vs Capablanca. But Kramnik will never be confused with Alekhine.
Nov-26-16  Kamagong42: yep! even though Kasparov failed to crack the Berlin due to his stubbornness, i believe he can regain his WCC title if the rematch happened, Kasparov was still at his prime then
Nov-26-16  devere: <Robyn Hode: Kramnik will be remembered as the player who avoided a rematch with Kasparov--as Alekhine did vs Capablanca.>

Kramnik's story on that matter is quite convincing to me.

http://chess-news.ru/en/node/4521

Nov-26-16  The Kings Domain: Kasparov played poorly in the match. A game like this would have been unthinkable in his prime. It's not so much Kramnik won the championship, it's that Kasparov lost it.
Nov-27-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  sycophante: <st.dvy: Now the Berlin is still causing so much trouble for white at the highest levels, that many 1.e4 players are actually switching...> For instance?
Could someone give a few examples of players who effectively stopped playing e4 because of the Berlin? I hear this from time to time but am curious to know if this is true.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 8)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Kasparov on Kasparov: Part I
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Power Chess - Kramnik
by Anatoly21
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Bernstein Defense Excep
from deniznba's favorite games by deniznba
pg.116
from The Big Book of Chess by Penguincw
attack on e6
from isolani by bharat123
martinsaw's favorite games
by martinsaw
Hidden Skillz's favorite games
by Hidden Skillz
November 26: Gazza's Tears
from Game of the Day 2016 by Phony Benoni
51a1_IQP on d4
by whiteshark
MOUSS's favorite games
by MOUSS
Classic Kramnik
by amadeus
LOUDERMILK's favorite games
by LOUDERMILK
14-n-13
from saveyougod's favorite games by saveyougod
yiotta's favorite games
by yiotta
Decisive World Championship Games
by FaradayBach
Nice ending
from bugdayci's favorite games by bugdayci
Ercan's favorite games I
by Ercan
Complex favorites
by Whitehat1963
IQP Wins.
by WiseWizard
Dutch, Nimzo, QID, Benoni, et al.
by mmzkr
Games of Beauty
by Xenon Oxide
plus 85 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2016, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies