Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Hydra (Computer) vs Arno Nickel
"Unplugged Nickel" (game of the day Jun-10-05)
Corr. Chess Match (2004)  ·  French Defense: Tarrasch Variation. Chistyakov Defense Modern Line (C07)  ·  0-1
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 13 times; par: 103 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Hydra/A Nickel games
sac: 52...Bxh4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) either press F or click on the e7 square.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-01-05  biglo: Read Correspondence GM Nickel on his defeat of Hydra at
Oct-12-05  Darkhorse12: Guys dont forget Nickel was using computer help too!
Feb-05-06  chessmoron: 14. g3-0-0 15. Bf4-, will that make Hydra a 'W' over Nickel?
Feb-13-06  MoranCho: With one exception, we're seeing
the same jealous, 1400 level vindiction ('teach me. o genius!') from the programmer's commentary.
Meanwhile, I first intended to look
at Gelfand's games again, just
HAPPENED to notice 'Genius' name
among the G's, and the stupid-a@##
programmer stupidly assumes that
I was fantasizing about my own
genuis?? What a jackass! Are all
programmers that moronic?
Premium Chessgames Member
  RandomVisitor: <chessmoron>Rybka suggests that line for moves 15. g3 O-O 16. Bf4, but only for a slight improvement.
Mar-24-06  trumbull0042: I read online that a third game between Hydra and Nickel is currently being played. Is this true?
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: <trumbull0042> Here is the third game:

(: B Bishop Berkeley B :)

Jul-05-06  spirit: so interesting to watch a monster,totally helpless,clueless,flat-footed and hung out to dry...i love this game!
Jul-05-06  sixfeetunder: That was rather sadistic.
Jul-05-06  Whitehat1963: When computers can play black and consistently give odds to super GMs in correspondence games, then I'll be convinced that there's absolutely no hope left for humanity.
Jul-05-06  weisyschwarz: Ah, the Nickel Defense.
Jul-06-06  spirit: <whitehat1963> that wont happen, because correspondence chess is ADVANCED chess...just check out the most suitable line for your opponent.Me thinks correspondence chess against machines should always end in favour of humans...QUOTE ME AFTER A HUNDRED YEARS!
Aug-20-06  monad: I still don't understand this 'Hydra losing on time' business with 40 days for 10 moves and presumably running non-stop.

A computer running out of time? Had it gone off on holiday or something? And didn't Hydra offer a draw earlier? Wisely refused by Black it seems.

Sep-02-06  MagnaPsygnosis: ???
Sep-04-06  patzer2: GM Nickle's analysis of this game can be found at
Sep-04-06  patzer2: Here's my take on this amazing human versus computer correspondence game using the opening explorer, Fritz 8 and GM Nickle's analysis:

<1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2>

The Winawer with 3. Nc3, as in
L Dominguez vs Yusupov, 2006, I Cheparinov vs Ponomariov, 2006
or Bologan vs Lputian, 2006, is the popular alternative. Although the Tarrasch may be safer for White, IMO the slightly riskier Winawer gives White more winning chances.

<3...c5 4. exd5>

A good option is 4. Ngf3 as in
Timman vs J Levitt, 2006, Carlsen vs Yusupov, 2006 and S B Hansen vs Akopian, 2006.


This appears to be the currently favored move at Master level. The main alternative is 4...exd5, as in Adams vs Yusupov, 2005, Carlsen vs S Agdestein, 2005 and V Nevednichy vs Korchnoi, 2004. Note that this decision helps to insure Black the Kingside pawn majority which proves to be the difference in the endgame.

<5. Ngf3 cxd4 6. Bc4 Qd6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Nb3 Nc6 9. Nbxd4 Nxd4 10. Nxd4 a6 11. Re1>

The main alternative is 11. Bb3
as in Khalifman vs S Volkov, 2005, M Vachier Lagrave vs Akopian, 2006
or J P Boudre vs T Luther, 2006.

<11...Qc7 12. Qe2>

Worth considering here is 12. Bb3 as in
Naiditsch vs S Kristjansson, 2005, Tiviakov vs Barsov, 2004 or S Pavlov vs V Malakhatko, 2004.

Sep-04-06  patzer2: <12...Bc5 13. c3 h6 14. Bd3>

Perhaps White should consider 14. Bb3, which was good for the draw in Kotronias vs Glek, 2003.

Another fascinating
possibility is 14. Nf5!? which GM Nickle analyzes at

<14...Bd7 15. Be3 Bd6 16. g3?!>

This IMO is a bit awkward and weakening. Instead, I think worth considering here is 16. h3 O-O 17. Rad1 =.

<16... O-O 17. Qd2?!>

GM Nickle labels this move as dubious and indicates that 17. Rad1 = is more flexible.

<17... Ng4>

Forcing the exchange of Knight for Bishop here IMO gives Black the advantage.

<18. Rad1 Rfe8 19. Nb3 Nxe3 20. Qxe3 Rad8 21. Qe4 g6 22. Bf1 Bc6 23. Qe3 Kh7 24. Bg2 e5 25. Bxc6 Qxc6 26. Qe4!?>

The exchange of Queens favors Black, but White may not gain much by delaying it. However, I suppose White could try to create complications and attempt to hold with the Fritz 8 line 26. Na5 Qc7 27. Nb3 f5 28. Rd5 e4 29. Red1 Bf8 30. Qd2 Rxd5 31. Qxd5 b5 .

Sep-04-06  patzer2: <26... Qxe4 27. Rxe4 Bc7 28. Ree1 b6 29. Na1 Kg7 30. Nc2 Rxd1 31. Rxd1 Rd8 32. Rxd8 Bxd8 33. Nb4 a5 34. Nd5 f5 35. c4 Kf7 36. a4 Ke6 37. b3 g5 38. h3 h5 39. Kf1 g4 40. h4?!>}

Apparently 40. h4?! was a mistake. GM Nickle indicates White could have held the draw fairly easily with 40. hxg4! One possibility played out with Fritz 8 is 40. hxg4 hxg4 41. Ke2 e4 42. Ke3 Be7 43. Kf4! (43. Nxe7?? Kxe7 44. Kd2 Kd6 45. Ke2 Kc5 46. Kd2 Kb4 47. Kc2 f4! 48. gxf4 e3 49. fxe3 g3 ) 43... Bd6+ 44. Ke3 Bc5+ 45. Ke2 Ke5 46. Ke1 Bd4 47. Ke2 Ke6 48. Ne3 Kf6 49. Ke1 Ke5 50. Nd5 Ke6 51. Ne3 Bc5 52. Nd5 Kf7 53. Ke2 =.

<40... f4 41. Ke2 Kf5 42. Kf1?!>

This appears to be White's decisive error. Instead, GM Nickle indicates 42. Kd3! e4+ 43. Ke2 fxg3 44. fxg3 Bf6 45. b4!? leads to a study-like draw.

<42...Ke4 43. Ke2 fxg3 44. fxg3 Kd4 45. Kd2 e4 46. Ke2 e3 47. Ke1>

No help for White is 47. Nf4 Bf6 48. Ne6+ Kc3 49. Kxe3 Kxb3 .

Sep-04-06  patzer2: <47... Kd3 48. Kd1 e2+ 49. Ke1 Kc2 50. Kxe2 Kxb3 51. Kd3 Kxa4 52. Kc2 Bxh4 53. gxh4 g3 54. Nf4>

White also loses after 54. Ne3 Kb4 55. Kb2 a4 56. Kc2 a3 57. Kb1 Kc3 58. Ka2 Kd3 .

<54... Kb4>}. 0-1

White's programers resign as Hydra is clearly lost. For example, play could continue 55. Ng2 Kxc4 56. Ne3+ Kb4 57. Kb2 b5 58. Nd5+ Kc4 59. Nf4 a4 60. Kc2 a3 61. Kb1 Kb3 62. Ng2 a2+ 63. Ka1 b4 64. Ne3 Ka3 65. Nc4+ Ka4 66. Kxa2 g2 67. Nb6+ Kb5 68. Kb2 g1=Q .

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Very interesting ending. White's knight at d5 looks good but doesn't accomplish anything.
Nov-03-06  MagnaPsygnosis: I know that 64 cpu's (cluster) is equal to any amount of cpu's (infinity), and that 32 cpu's is barely weaker than 64 cpu's (the elo power is not linear to the amount of cpu's) but Hydra wasnt using 64 cpu's.
Oct-30-08  missingkasparov: is this game as good as a single game played over the board vs a computer i think not . but mr.nickel does get e for effort good try!
Dec-05-10  misha1992: Great game who knew humans were good? Haha! I like it when computers get pawned! Pun intended!
Mar-09-11  Penguincw: Hydra's only lost with the white pieces.Nickel has too many passed pawns for Hydra to worry about.
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Great game by GMAN! In his honor, I made a donation to The Human Fund. "Money for People" is their motto.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Computer - GM games 2003-2007
by biglo
30_B:N - Realise their magic relationship
by whiteshark
by Antiochus
Educative Endgames
by isolatedpawn
French Defense: Tarrasch Variation. Chistyakov Defense Modern L
from adichess' B00 - C19 by adichess
Hydra is beatable (in correspondence chess).
from Computer evolution by sibilare
Game collection: exw
by parmetd
chessmaster pro's favorite games
by chessmaster pro
imprisoned "nickeled" bishop sac-ed to force pawn through
from magic endings by kevin86
Unplugged Nickel
from GM vs Computer by larrewl
June 10: Unplugged Nickel
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies