chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Andreas Bartsch vs H Meyer
corr (1949)  ·  Blackmar-Diemer Gambit: Vienna Variation (D00)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more games of A Bartsch
sac: 32.Rxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  jahhaj: Easy of course.

In the database Holger Meyer appears to be at least three different people, maybe four. Is it a common name?

Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Hooray for Mondays. Funny that Black didn't resign in a correspondence game.
Sep-11-06  LoFarkas: Could have been a case of letting White complete his work as an acknowledgement of a really well-played game? Still, in correspondence???
Sep-11-06  anandr: Really one of the easier ones.
Sep-11-06  prinsallan: Gotto love mondays ^^
Sep-11-06  child in time: Love mondays... make me think I'm good at chess ^^
Sep-11-06  SPCCrutch: i say it should have started on move 29... for white. i forgot mondays where this easy...
Sep-11-06  Krebstar: too easy
Sep-11-06  EmperorAtahualpa: This was a correspondence game and yet it was played out until the last move. Looks like an awful waste of stamps to me. :) Anyway, nice Monday puzzle.
Sep-11-06  franksp: Years ago, I used to play correspondence chess. The player woth white was given a score sheet which was to be mailed back and forth. On the score sheet was a space for conditional moves like "14... P-K5 15. B-Q3 P-B4 16. N-Q2" - that sort of thing. The player receiving the conditional move sequence could play the sequence as far as he liked or of course not play it at all. The idea was to speed up the game. I would be surprised if conditional moves were not widely used and quite likely the last few moves of this game were from a sequence of conditional moves.
Sep-11-06  EmperorAtahualpa: Black missed 7...Qc8!
Sep-11-06  zb2cr: An easy one. Saw it in under 5 seconds. Mondays are fun!
Sep-11-06  uuft: Pretty easy. My dog saw it, too. Just kiddin'.
Sep-11-06  Kreifi: Damn, took few minutes to find it out. I must be in rust. :(
Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Nice and easy mate-in-2. I suppose that technically, the rook sac would be considered a 'decoy', setting up the black king for a nifty Q+N mate.
Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: <uuft> I know Brian "the dog" Griffin (Family Guy) saw it.

This could have been a Tuesday or Wednesday puzzle if it had started earlier at move 31.

A good solid conclusion-sort of a "one-armed" epaulette mate.

Sep-11-06  lvlaple: I got it in < one second... but would I have played it in a game? Probably not. Puzzles are easier when you know they are puzzles and this is a prime example.
Sep-11-06  crumpy: Simple, the rook sacrifice is so obvious, bring on tuesday's puzzle!!
Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <franksp> Thanks for the history on "conditional moves". They may speed up the game, but they might also carry a psychological punch (or they could give away too much information an backfire).

I would think that giving conditional moves would be a bad idea unless you're really sure that your entire line is solid. Basically, you're committing to a sequence of moves, and once you drop it in the mail, you can't change your mind.

Sep-11-06  pawn52: Got it. Puzzle wasn't that difficult today. Fortunatelly for me :D. Took me maybe 5 seconds to figure it out. Not hard at all.
Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <This problem really should have started one move earlier.> Not true! The problem is destroyed in this position


click for larger view

Because the obvious Qxg6 is a forced mate as well.

Sep-11-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopofBlunder: This puzzle is made alot more difficult if you fail to notice the white rook on h1. :)
Sep-11-06  Chess Classics: I was going to say something about how easy Mondays are, but the others seem to have taken the words out of my mouth. Cheers!

Regards,
CC

Sep-13-06  patzer2: It's mate-in-two with the decoy sham sacrifice 32. Rxh7+!
Apr-06-09  WhiteRook48: why did white choose the sacrificial mate
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
32.? (September 11, 2006)
from Monday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
one-armed epaulette mate
from unique themes three by kevin86
puzzle 11/09/2006 white to play 32.?
from puzzles from18/7/2006 by vuchamchi
32. Rxh7+!
from Mate (Mate in 2) by patzer2
32.? (Monday, September 11)
from Puzzle of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies