chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs Aaron Goldberg
"Rube Goldberg Machine" (game of the day Aug-02-2024)
Simul, 19b (1905) (exhibition), Mercantile Library, Philadelphia, PA USA, Apr-29
Scandinavian Defense: Main Lines. Leonhardt Gambit (B01)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,540 more games of Lasker
+ sac: 11.Bxf7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-27-06  ChessDude33: wow...what i wouldn't give to have whites position aftr 8. Bc4, this gambit is awesome, taking full advantage of the early queen development in the scandinavian (and yes i realize AG Berg isn't exactly the best player).
Dec-03-14  TheFocus: From a simul at the Mercantile in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 23 (circa), 1905.

Lasker's score is unknown.

Aug-04-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <From a simul at the Mercantile in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 23 (circa), 1905.>

Per Lasker vs S T Sharp, 1905, this game should be dated April 29th. The <Philadelphia Inquirer>, April 30th, 1905, p.16, cited there, gives a list of all of Lasker's opponents, including <A Goldberg> (very likely this one: A Goldberg). Whyld's source, the <Literary Digest> of June 10th 1905, evidently corrupted this to <A G Berg>. It also has <15. Bxd6 and White won>, so apparently Black didn't throw in the towel.

Feb-18-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  mifralu: <Whyld's source, the <Literary Digest> of June 10th 1905, evidently corrupted this to <A G Berg>. It also has <15. Bxd6 and White won>, so apparently Black didn't throw in the towel.>

<A G Berg> also in Lasker's Chess Magazine, July 1905, p. 116

Aug-02-24  Atking: At first sight I thought 15...Nd7 16.Qe6 0-0-0 playable not realizing that Black has lost the right to castle...
Aug-02-24  Amarande: Black is up on material (R+B+N vs Q+P) and there is no forced mate. White's only immediate threat, in fact, is 16 Ne6 hitting the B to gain tempo for 17 Nc7+, which is easily parried by 16 ... Bf6.

It is certainly too soon to resign.

It's a true pity we don't have the rest of the score, because barring a Black blunder shortly after (perhaps he played 15 ... Nf6?? 16 Qxe7#) the position is very complicated, and if White does not realize some additional concrete gain before Black consolidates, there is a very good chance that he would even lose; I can only assume that Lasker, endgame wizard that he was, won it via his Pawns in that stage (a few quick clicks into the deeper stages of the endgame on Chesscom suggest White perhaps eventually gains another Pawn or two and then uses them to win enough Black pieces to come down to a Q vs. R endgame).

Aug-02-24  Autoreparaturwerkbau: Eventhough spectacular,
<12.Rxb7?> is a bad move since it throws the clearly won position away and reenters a pretty complicated position as <Amarande> notes.

Instead 12.Nfg5+


click for larger view

should be played immediately and with black's queen gone in next few moves due to pins and mate threats white is then free to gobble black's poorly developed pieces and winning convincingly.

Aug-02-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: Missy and Amarande are right, the score seems incomplete which is unfortunate because up to there the game is exciting. I looked on other sites but they give the same, sometimes with "AG. Berg" as noted.

According to 365chess, Lasker scored +5 -3 =1 which doesn't look impressive but there were apparently strong players of whom Oscar Chajes : https://www.365chess.com/tournament...

So we're waiting for a real connoisseur to unearth an article from the local paper with the score, as sometimes happens (these posts always amaze me).

Aug-02-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < Simul, 19b (1905) >

In the header.. does "19b" indicate 19 boards?

Aug-02-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: Hi PawnSac,

Yes it does, I missed that. The games from 365chess are hence not complete (it did seem few, but sometimes happens if the opponents are of higher level than NN).

So we're still waiting for a scholar to provide the complete score of the game and Lasker's performance.

Aug-02-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: that would be great if available. I'll have to look through my library and see if there is anything related in old game collections.
Aug-03-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <So we're still waiting for a scholar to provide the complete score of the game and Lasker's performance.>

Lasker went +15=3-1. The game was initially published in the Philadelphia <North American> from which all other chess columns acquired the game. No additional moves are available.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC