chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Karen Asrian vs Arman Pashikian
"Arman Hammered" (game of the day Jun-10-2008)
66th Armenian Championship (2006), Yerevan ARM, rd 4, Mar-19
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 6 times; par: 48 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more K Asrian/A Pashikian games
sac: 32.Rxh4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-28-06  yataturk: What is the deal? White is up an elephant anyways..
Mar-28-06  Capa15: Got it. Even BxN probably wins too.
Mar-28-06  Sleepyeyeguy: I really don't play it out in my head, I just saw the key line and stopped...32.Rxh4 Nxf3 33.Rh7+ Kxh7 34.Nf6+ Kg7 35.Nxd7 blah blah blah. don't know.. not extremely exciting
Mar-28-06  Rookinstein: Got this instantly. ♖xh4 followed by♖h7+ ♔xh7 34.♘f6+ with an easy win
Mar-28-06  ataturk: Nice puzzle.. I don't think the fork was planned by white though..
Mar-28-06  notyetagm: Everyone stops analyzing at 35 ♘xd7 but I think you need to calculate a bit further to make sure that the White d7-knight does not get trapped on the enemy's side of the board.

Notice how White immediately pushes his c-pawn forward with 36 c4 and 37 c5 to secure either the c5- or b6-square for his d7-knight.

Mar-28-06  Ashram64: obviously there is the Nf6 fork waiting...so even sacrfice a queen w/ Rxh4 white could earn it right back by deflection rook sacrifice.. it was just a fair trade..white was up a piece anyways..so trading more pieces aways and forcing an endgame is more beneficial
Mar-28-06  Infohunter: Got it, and would have done so sooner if I hadn't taken a few seconds to notice that White was a piece up going in. How unobservant of me that was!
Mar-28-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: Theme of the week: Attacking the king along the a- and h-file.
Mar-28-06  prinsallan: Just trading the White Q for R+N wins, doesn't it? I mean, R+N+B must be better than just a Q!
Mar-28-06  notyetagm: <Ashram64 ... it was just a fair trade..white was up a piece anyways..so trading more pieces aways and forcing an endgame is more beneficial>

Exactly. White forced a fair trade when ahead in material ♗ versus ♙♙, simplifying to a winning endgame. And with the queens and rooks now off the board, Black has no chance to launch a desperation counterattack. Black can only grovel in a losing endgame.

Using tactics (<knight fork>) in this way to force simplification to a winning/better endgame is known as <tactical liquidation>.

Mar-28-06  RandomVisitor: Interesting puzzle because all moves other than 32.Rxh4 lose! (32.Qd3? f3+ or Rxg4+!)

Also, black could improve with 35...Nd2! where the win is a lot harder to prove.

Mar-28-06  dzechiel: Saw it all in a few seconds. The only interesting part is how white's knight gets stranded and freed.
Mar-28-06  Confuse: saw it but didnt see the queen fork. mooooooo
Mar-28-06  notyetagm: <dzechiel: ... The only interesting part is how white's knight gets stranded and freed.>

Yes, that part about freeing the knight is very important. I quickly saw the knight fork but then I worried that my knight would be trapped and eventually lost to Black's king (... ♔x♘).

Many of the solvers apparently didn't even consider this possibilty, stopping their analysis after 35 ♘x♕. <Never stop analyzing when you have a piece trapped on the enemy's side of the board!> If this knight had indeed been trapped and lost, White would be down two healthy pawns for nothing, almost a certain loss.

Asrian clearly had the <knight-rescuing idea> 36 c4, 37 c5, and 38 c6 in mind before he began the combination.

Mar-28-06  Marco65: Notice that if 39...Nxe4 then 40.Nxb6 creates a dangerous passed a-pawn (40...cxb6?? 41.c7 promotes). That's why Black plays 39...f3+, then takes in e4 with check and plays d5 not only to pretect the knight but also to free the d6 square for it.

Good defence, but of course the material advantage is overwhelming.

Mar-28-06  RandomVisitor: 35... Nd2 36. Bg4 Kf7 37. Nb8 Nxe4 38. Bc8 Nc5 39. b4 Nxa4 40. Bxb7 c5 (Nxc3 41.Nxa6 Nb5 42.Bc6) 41. Nxa6 Ke7


click for larger view

White still has a little work to do for the win

Mar-28-06  notyetagm: <Marco65> I did see that. 40 ♘xb6! exploits the tactical point that <blockaders do not defend, they blockade>.

That is, since the Black c7-pawn is the only Black unit stopping White from playing c6-c7-c8=♕ by <blockading> the advanced White c6-pawn, it cannot also <defend> the b6-pawn. Black's c7-pawn is simply <overworked>, having to both <blockade> the White c6-pawn and <defend> the Black b6-pawn.

Mar-28-06  Deefstes: I saw it all the way to the loss of white Queen but dismissed the idea as I didn't see a winning combination in it. I conceded that I was beaten by the puzzle only to open the game up and notice that I did see correct line after all.

So can someone explain how this qualifies as a "nice" or "interesting" puzzle? From what I can see, it is a straight swop of R+Q for R+Q producing a marginally better end game for White. Is that it?

I suppose there are two things that I didn't notice which means that I did not get the puzzle.

1. There is probably no better line for white than the played line.

2. The played line resulted in white's Knight coming perilously close to being trapped which required some deeper planning than just to the fork on King and Queen.

My conclusion, it probably is a "nice" and "interesting" puzzle but more tricky than I'd expect from a Tuesday and beyond my level of skill.

Mar-28-06  ckr: Seems to me I have been doing better in the latter part of the week lately. This one did not seem easy, since I missed the (not so obvious to me) setup for the knight fork.

I immediately saw White is a piece up and black's superior pawn structure as the imbalance in the position. I felt any solution had to incorporate correcting that imbalance, even to the point of returning a piece to accomplish it. So after RxR,NxQ,KxN,QxP I thought this sucks, other lines seemed worse so I just looked at the game.

Afterwards, I thought <Hey dork, didn't they just complete a week of setting up knight forks>

Mar-28-06  yataturk: Really, after the exchanges, all white wins is a pawn.
Mar-28-06  euripides: White might also win by playing 36 Nb8 and then Na6. E.g. 35...Nd2 36 Nb8 a5 37 f3 Nb3 38 Na6 bxa6 39 Bxa6 looks winning because White will get an outside passed pawn with B vs. N. However, Black has unexpected resources: 39...Nc5 40 Bb5 Nb3 41 Bd3 Nc5 42 Bc2 Na6 43 Bd1 g5 44 Be2 Nc5 45 b4 axb4 46 a5 b3 doesn't seem to work for White.

I think,though, White can win by omitting f3 and bringing the knight out via c6: 35...Nd2 36 Nb8 a5 37 Nc6 f3+ 38 Bxf3 Nxf3 39 Kxf3 bxc6 40 b4. Or 35...Nd2 36 Nb8 f3+ 37 Bxf3 Nxf3 38 Kxf3 a5 39 Nc6 bxc6 40 b4. Or 35...Nd2 36 Nb8 a5 37 Nc6 bxc6 38 b4 Nb3 39 Bc4 Nd2 40 Ba2 when the knight is cut off. In all cases, Black probably cannot stop the a pawn.

Mar-28-06  mbt123au: ataturk: Nice puzzle.. I don't think the fork was planned by white though.. i think you're wrong..look at move 25 (e6)..this was the start of the fork...he played a very good game.
Mar-28-06  dakgootje: I got the puzzle i guess, as i saw up to 35. Nxd7 BUT i went for, as i think, more fun game which went on : 35. Nxd7 Ng5 36. Nb8 Nxe4 37. Nxa6 bxa6 38. Bxa6 ...

Threw the position in Fritz 8, did some calculation, and it wins too. If some one need it, i will post fritz' analysis later on today, as ive got to go back to school again ;-)

Mar-28-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I got this - I calculated another way for the knigt to escape howver and for White to win. An entertaining and instructive game and combination.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC