chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vladimir Kramnik vs Loek van Wely
"Slav to Fashion" (game of the day Jul-01-2008)
Dortmund Sparkassen (2008), Dortmund GER, rd 2, Jun-29
Slav Defense: Quiet Variation (D11)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 24 times; par: 41 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 39 more Kramnik/Van Wely games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-01-08  offtherook: Beautiful. Kramnik is a monster with White, and a rock with Black. If he's on form, I can not imagine anyone beating him in a match.
Jul-01-08  Infin1ty: 22...f5 and after 36 hours fritz 11 decides the resulting game must be drawn with perfect play.

Easy move to see.....for a computer ;)

Hard to spot that it's the only saving move in such a nasty/ugly position though keeping d7 from the knight seems at least "a" priority and that moves delivers in that respect.

Over the board with the clock ticking though. I can;t really blame him for missing it.

Jul-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Infin1ty: Hard to spot that [22...f5] is the only saving move in such a nasty/ugly position though keeping d7 from the knight seems at least "a" priority and that moves delivers in that respect.>

Another factor which might help the defender to spot f5 as a good move, even without calculating all the possible variations, is that it stabilizes Black's position by preventing White from playing both Ng4 and f5 - two important attacking resources (23.Ng4 would be strong after 22...f6, for example).

Jul-01-08  RandomVisitor: After 21...Qb5


click for larger view

Rybka2.3.2a.mp.x64: <19-ply>

1. (1.81): 22.f5 f6 23.Ng4 Bb6 24.Qg3 Rf8 25.a4 Qd3 26.fxe6 h5 27.a5 hxg4 28.axb6

Jul-01-08  Infin1ty: f5 immediately would deffinately be stronger than Qg3 at that point (that one feels more natural to me than Qg3 even).

Qg3 does let the f5 from black in which should be avoided (according to our silicon friends). On the level at which Kramnik operates, Qg3 can almost be classified as a "blunder" (there I said it!), at the very least an inaccuracy.

Since v. Wely is Kramnik's second at his big matches, would the knowledge Kramnik has on van Wely have any influence here? As in "I know what he's going to play in this and that position so I'm going to play on thay knowledge".

Jul-01-08  Longbrow: After 14… ♘e4, attempting to post and infiltrate White’s first three ranks, Black’s only choices for the rest of the game are to accept losing exchanges or accept forced moves. This is a dominating game by White.
Jul-01-08  vanytchouck: I'm not a Kramnik hater (in fact, i'm no one hater) and i never call him "Drawnik", but i just don't understand why Kramnik's fans are so hurry and happy to greet that win.

As if the fans and the haters end up acting symetrically.

For a player of the level of Kramnik, beating Van Wely is almost not worth mentioning.

Van Wely never beat Anand in classical game (0-7 and 8 = ; 5w; 10 b). His score against Topalov and Kramnik are hardly better.

* Against Topalov : 2-7 and 4 = (6 w; 7 b).
* Against Kramnik (now) : 3-9 and 6 = (7w; 11 b).

Moreover, in this game, Van Wely has played poorly enough missing opportunities to escape from the grip of the best strategist of his generation who didn't need to use all his talent.

In my opinion, this is a good game worth studying four us the amateurs but far below the 2750 level.

Jul-01-08  notyetagm: <Eyal: ... Another factor which might help the defender to spot f5 as a good move, even without calculating all the possible variations, is that it stabilizes Black's position by preventing White from playing both Ng4 and f5 - two important attacking resources (23.Ng4 would be strong after 22...f6, for example).>

Very good point. That ... f7-f5! move by Black prevents -TWO- White attacking ideas, both ♘e5-g4 and f4-f5.

Jul-01-08  ToTheDeath: It seems unwise to let White set up a stonewall with Ne5 and f4. Better to play 9...Qc7 10.Qe2 O-O 11.e4 dxe4 12.Nxe4 Be7 with only a slight advantage for White.
Jul-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: game played 6/29/08: GOTD 7/1/08.

Just think,before the age of computers,this game wouldn't be seen for a long time!

Jul-01-08  RandomVisitor: After the suggested improvement for black, 22...f5:


click for larger view

Rybka2.3.2a.mp.x64: <26-ply>

1. (1.76): 23.Qg6 Bb6 24.Qxe6+ Kh8 25.Qxf5 Qd5 26.Rad1 Bxe3+ 27.Kh1 Bd2 28.Ng6+ Kg8 29.Qxd5+ cxd5

Jul-01-08  acirce: <RandomVisitor> I am not surprised. It would help if Rybka clarified why Black starts giving away those pawns, though :-)
Jul-01-08  RandomVisitor: <acirce>Rybka does not like the 23...Re7 line, for example:

22...f5 23.Qg6 <Re7> 24.Rad1 and now:


click for larger view

Rybka2.3.2a.mp.x64: <21-ply>

1. (1.82): 24...Ba6 25.Rfe1 Qb7 26.Rd6 Bb6 27.Nxc6 Bc4 28.Nxe7+ Qxe7 29.a4 Rf8 30.a5 Rf7 31.Rc6

2. (2.05): 24...Bb6 25.Rfe1 Rf8 26.Rd7 Qxe5 27.fxe5 Rxd7 28.Qxe6+ Rdf7 29.Bd4 Bxd4 30.exd4 Kh7 31.Kf2

3. (2.13): 24...Qe2 25.bxa5 c5 26.Bc1 Bd5 27.g4 Rf8 28.gxf5 Rf6 29.Qg3 Rxf5 30.Rd2 Qb5 31.Rg2

<patzer2>
22...f5 23.Qg6 Re7 24. Rad1 <Qe2> 25. bxa5 <Qxb2> and now Rybka likes 26.Rf2 with .

Jul-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <22...f5 23.Qg6 Re7 24.Rad1 Qe2 25.bxa5 Qxb2 and now Rybka likes 26.Rf2>

OK, apparently the winning idea is 26...Qxa3 27.Rfd2 Qxa5 (not so much to grab a pawn as to defend d8 and indirectly d7) 28.Kf2! (defending e1) and Black remains helpless against Rd7. Still, it would have been a bit more tricky to find otb than 23.Nd7 after 22...Bb6...

Jul-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Random Visitor> Thanks for the deep Rybka analysis of 22...f5. You've got me convinced White wins with near perfect play. Still, OTB, I think White would have had better practical chances with this try than the game continuation.

Anyway, I got pretty much the same result as <Eyal> after forcing it into my old Fritz 8. I assume White's winning line is <22...f5 23.Qg6 Re7 24.Rad1 Qe2 25.bxa5 Qxb2 <26.Rf2>, followed by 26...Qxa3 27.Rfd2 Qxa5 28. Kf2! Rae8 29. Rd7 and White's domination of the open d-file and the seventh rank open it up for a White win.

P.S. It's surprising that White can get away with trading his Queen-side pawns for doubled d-file rooks and invasion of the seventh rank.

Jul-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Random Visitor> Just curious. How long and deep ply did you have to run Rybka to find the refutation to 22...f5? Also did you use a double or quad processor when running it to solve this one? Any forcing of moves (i.e. sliding back and forth) needed here?

Apparently more than just my old version of Fritz 8 had trouble finding the line as <Infin1ty:> wrote <22...f5 and after 36 hours fritz 11 decides the resulting game must be drawn with perfect play.>

Jul-01-08  psmith: <patzer2> The move 28. Kf2 in the above variation is amazing.
Jul-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <psmith> Yes, 28. Kf2 is an unexpected surprise in this line. Indeed, the whole 22...f5 Rybka refutation is amazing.
Jul-01-08  drpoundsign: Boned Loek?

The Funky Queen Medina?!

Jul-01-08  RandomVisitor: <patzer2>At about 21 ply it started to show up. I was just checking the work done by others here. This particular PC is a dual core. No sliding back and forth.
Jul-02-08  RandomVisitor: After 21...Qb5


click for larger view

Rybka2.3.2a.mp.x64: <22-ply>

1. (1.76): 22.f5 f6 23.Ng4 e5 24.Qg3 Rf8 25.a4 Qe2 26.Rf2 Qd3 27.bxa5 Kh7 28.Rc1 Bc8

2. (0.95): 22.Qg4 f6 23.Qxe6+ Kh7 24.Nd7 Qd5 25.Qxd5 cxd5 26.Nxf6+ gxf6 27.bxa5 Kg6 28.f5+ Kf7

3. (0.79): 22.Qg3 f6 23.Ng4 Kh7 24.Rfb1 Bb6 25.a4 Qxb4 26.a5 Bxa5 27.Be5 Qe7 28.Bxc7 Qxc7

Jul-02-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Random Visitor> Thanks for the system information. Gives me some hope (finding this difficult solution on a dual core computer with Rybka) that I can find a dedicated computer to devote to Chess, Bybka, Chess Base and a five piece endgame table base without having to break the bank.

P.S. I find it interesting that Rybka has scored over a 2900 rating on single core Athlon processors running at 1200 MHZ and with only 256MB of RAM according to the Swiss computer rating organization.

Their most recent rating list can be found on the web at http://ssdf.bosjo.net/list.htm. Also, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedis..., <The SSDF has announced that their next platform for testing will be an Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 2.4 GHz with 2 GB of RAM-memory and a 64-bit operating system.>

P.S. Maybe that (Quad 6600 2.4 GHz with 2 GB of RAM) would be a good moderately priced system choice for those of us looking to upgrade to a new computer, without breaking the bank by buying the expensive top of the line hardware ($3,000 and up computers with extremely fast dual core quad processors and 8 MB of Ram) used in some of the recent super chess computer competitions (i.e. see Rybka brief competition platform description at http://www.grappa.univ-lille3.fr/ic... for example).

Jul-02-08  RandomVisitor: <patzer2>Thanks for that info.
Aug-18-08  Ulhumbrus: <Eyal> On 22 f5 one alternative is 22..Bb6 eg 23 fxe6 faxe6 24 Qxe6+ Kh7 25 Qf5+ Kg8 26 Qxe4 Qe2
Mar-17-10  pablo333: In my view, Kramnik obtained his advantage in this game with 10 Ne5. Therefore had black developed his king-bishop to e7 instead of d6, the balance could've been better maintained.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
198
from Kramnik - My Life and Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
July 1: Slav to Fashion
from Game of the Day 2008 by Phony Benoni
koinonia's favorite games
by koinonia
AdrianP's Bookmarked Games (2008)
by AdrianP
it's in them russians' blood
from fav Kramnik & Euwe games by guoduke
198
from Kramnik - My Life and Games by peckinpah
Kramnik krush
from knightspringer's favorite games by knightspringer
psychler's favorite games
by psychler
barb's favorite games 2
by barb
Vladimir Kramnik's Best Games
by KingG
Game 1025
from # Chess Informant Best Games. 1001-1100 by Qindarka
198
from Kramnik - My Life and Games by jakaiden
Kramnik plays against the Semi-Slav a la Palliser's Play 1 d4!
from KRAMNIK'S BEST GAMES by notyetagm
Book of Five Rings' favorite games 2
by Book of Five Rings
Dortmund 2008
from # Greatest Tournaments 2008 by Qindarka
"Slav to Fashion"
from Games of the day by Herkus
fuerst's favorite games
by fuerst
Vladimir Kramnik's Best Games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt
Simple and nice
from Positional masterpieces by arsen387
plus 8 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC