chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wang Yue vs Viswanathan Anand
Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2009) (blindfold), Nice FRA, rd 11, Mar-26
Slav Defense: Quiet Variation. Schallopp Defense (D12)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Wang Yue/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-26-09  mjk: <Nalimov> would win: 61...♘e4 win in 43, or 61...♘e5 win in 61, or 61...♘f5 win in 63. All other moves draw.
Mar-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: According to the TB, Anand's had a win in that ending on several occasions, last time on move 70.


click for larger view

Here 70...Nb8 is mate in 41 and 70...Nc6 - mate in 61.

Mar-26-09  digitbo: earlier in the game Wang Yue did ok as he followed rybka3 recommendations until 21.Rhe1?

rybka recommended 21. Be5 as +1 for White

After that you can tell there is still a large gap in strength between Wang Yue and Anand.

Mar-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Position after 57.Kc4:


click for larger view

Before the obscure tablebase wins in the two-knights-vs-pawn ending, Anand's real miss was 57...Nf4! (instad of ...Ne5+?) when Black can win White's c-pawn while keeping his b- and g-pawns with 58.Kb4 Nd5+.

Mar-27-09  znprdx: <Aug-08-08 dumbgai: We might not see this endgame occur again at the super-GM level, but if it does it should be interesting to see how the players handle it.> WOW - spooo-ky re Topalov vs Karpov, 2000
Mar-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Anand reached the infamous "Halley's Comet" endgame against Wang Yue in the blindfold. The defunct American magazine Inside Chess had an article on two knights versus pawn and gave it that name because you should only see it once in your lifetime.> (http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt...)

Topalov, btw, happened to play this endgame twice in the same year, though once as the attacker (where he managed to win) and once as the defender (where he managed to draw):

Topalov vs Karpov, 2000
Topalov vs Sasikiran, 2000

Not including this one, the endgame explorer features 31 games that reached this endgame: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: Sasikiran played on for twenty moves after taking Topalov's pawn in the above mentioned Topalov vs Sasikiran, 2000, and that even though it was classical time controls, that's being optimistic :-)
Mar-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <As GM Erwin l'Ami explained to me, the biggest mistake was not to go for 61...Ne4-c5, because the basic idea is to block the pawn with a knight as soon as possible, not with the king. After that a win in 62 moves isn't relevant of course, but 70...Nb8! was the last practical chance. In a way 70...Nb6? is the wrong idea because the White king should be driven to a1, not to a8, where the c-pawn only gets in the way of the mating constructions, as was shown in the game.> (http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/l...)
Mar-27-09  firebyrd: <After that [ 21.Rhe1?] you can tell there is still a large gap in strength between Wang Yue and Anand.>

At that time there was also a large gap in time remaining. Anand's complications had caused Wang to spend almost all of his time, while the champ had most of his remaining, and seemed to be running the game the way he wanted. Good work from Wang in saving the draw.

Jul-23-09  David2009: This NN vs P ending is not as difficult as its reputation. The ending starts at


click for larger view

With perfect play there is mate in 43 (Nalimov). With imperfect play against the program KCHESS (1997 edition, for Windows 95, runs under Windows XP) the game might end [K-Chess Game]
[BLACK to Play]
[Board]
WP C3; BN F3; BN G3; WK A5; BK C6
[Moves]
1 Ng3-e4 2 Ka5-b4 Ne4-c5 3 Kb4-c4 Kc6-d6 4 Kc4-b4 Kd6-d5 5 c3-c4+ Kd5-d4 6 Kb4-b5 Nf3-e5 7 Kb5-b4 Ne5-d7 8 Kb4-b5 Kd4-c3 9 Kb5-c6 Kc3-b4 10 Kc6-c7 Kb4-a5 11 Kc7-c6 Ka5-a6 12 Kc6-c7 Nd7-e5 13 Kc7-d6 Ne5-d3 14 Kd6-c6 Ka6-a7 15 Kc6-d5 Ka7-b7 16 Kd5-d4 Kb7-c6 17 Kd4-c3 Kc6-d6 18 Kc3-d4 Kd6-e6 19 Kd4-e3 Ke6-e5 20 Ke3-f3 Nd3-b4 21 Kf3-e2 Ke5-e4 22 Ke2-d2 Ke4-f3 23 Kd2-c3 Nb4-c6 24 Kc3-d2 Kf3-f2 25 Kd2-c2 Kf2-e2 26 Kc2-c1 Nc6-d4 27 Kc1-b2 Ke2-d2 28 Kb2-b1 Nd4-e2 29 Kb1-b2 Ne2-c1 30 Kb2-b1 Nc1-d3 31 Kb1-a2 Kd2-c3 32 Ka2-a3 Nd3-b2 33 Ka3-a2 Nb2-d3 34 Ka2-a3 Kc3-c2 35 Ka3-a2 Nd3-b4+ 36 Ka2-a3 Nb4-c6 37 Ka3-a2 Nc5-a4 38 Ka2-a3 Na4-c3 39 c4-c5 Nc3-b5+ 40 Ka3-a4 Nb5-c7 41 Ka4-a3 Kc2-c3 42 Ka3-a4 Kc3-c4 43 Ka4-a3 Nc7-b5+ 44 Ka3-b2 Kc4-d3 45 Kb2-c1 Nb5-d4 46 Kc1-d1 Nd4-c2 47 Kd1-c1 Nc2-e3 48 Kc1-b2 Kd3-c4 49 Kb2-c1 Kc4-c3 50 Kc1-b1 Ne3-d1 51 Kb1-a1 Nd1-b2 52 Ka1-a2 Nb2-c4 53 Ka2-b1 Kc3-d2 54 Kb1-a2 Kd2-c2 55 Ka2-a1 Nc6-d4 56 Ka1-a2 Nd4-b3 57 c5-c6 Nb3-c1+ 58 Ka2-a1 Nc4-a5 59 c6-c7 Na5-b3 checkmate
[EndGame]
White's time 7 min 20 s Black's time 10 min 9 s (computer playing White matches user's time).

I was playing Black and had a long think at around move 33 since the thematic Nc4 is impossible (c4 is occupied by the WP). I also became worried about the looming 50 move draw, hence had to allow the P advance. I am sure that there are better plans for both sides: the point is, the ending is winnable.

KCHESS is an old program, but plays reasonably well. When I bought KCHESS circa 1998, I used to win comfortably playing the Windows 3.1 version. When I upgraded to Windows 98 so using KCHESS for Windows 95, the tables were turned.

White's play and Black's play are far from optimal: the point is, the ending can be won without expending enormous thought by the player with the NN (one simply looks for patterns/ positions which drive the defending K back). It is noteworthy that in Topalov vs Karpov, 2000 Topalov won at fast-chess time limits: his moves were almost automatic (as were mine in the ending above up to move 32). Karpov lost partly through ignorance (he should have moved his K towards the blockading N and P) partly through bad luck (without time to calculate his 'instinctive' moves turned out to be bad).

I am sure Anand would have won without difficulty in normal chess: the double handicap of blindfold plus fast play shows that even world champions are human. This ending, of NN versus blockaded Bishop's pawn was won very efficiently by Seitz in 1931, see Znosko-Borovsky vs J A Seitz, 1931

For useful general comments on this ending (blockaded RP as example) see Game Collection: Two Knights versus Pawn by <Resignation Trap>.

Apologies for the length of this post!

Jan-07-17  YouRang: This was the position after 61.Kxa5


click for larger view

Since the correct technique requires the opposing pawn to be blocked by a *knight*, his best move was 61...Ne4, so that 62.c4 could be answered by 62...Nc5.

Anand, misplayed it with <61...Kc5? 62.c4!> which has the *king* blocking the pawn, and the pawn is far enough advanced that black cannot correct it (e.g. by putting a N on c6) -- IF white plays his side correctly.

As it turned out, Yue also misplayed his side giving Anand another chance. After 62...Ne4:


click for larger view

White had the choice of putting his king on a4 or a6. Somehow, <63.Ka4> feels right, but 64.Ka6! was correct, because he can threaten to support his advancing c-pawn, and when the pawn gets to c5, it interferes with black's maneuverability since the pawn cannot be captured!

Anand still couldn't find the right technique, and Yue managed to draw at move 85 (stalemate). A very difficult ending for both sides.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: BLINDFOLD. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
A tricky moment in a difficult P vs NN ending
from Games analyzed by YouRang by YouRang


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC