Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Paul Morphy vs NN
New York USA (1857), New York USA
Chess variants (000)  ·  1-0


find similar games 34 more Morphy/NN games
sac: 12.dxe6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-18-10  laskerdog: I may be an ignorant, but this is anyhow a brutal performance.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessdreamer: identical with Steinitz vs Rock, 1863.
Dec-08-10  muratski: what a beauty! Incredible!
Jun-12-11  lemonadepawn: Morphy was something.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: Morphy at his spellbinding best.



May-02-12  ninja warrior: what makes this game even more amazing is that morphy starts down a rook. =D
Jul-31-12  andyatchess: Forced from 13. exf7+ of course
Aug-26-12  backrank: <Chessdreamer: identical with Steinitz vs Rock, 1863.>

Since it's very unlikely for this particular game to have happened twice, it seems to me that it has been falsely attributed to Morphy and he has in fact never played this game. It may come as a terrible disappointment for Morphy fans, but it was indeed Steinitz who played like Morphy here, and in fact he WAS able to play this way, and he did so several times during his early years.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: This game was given in Brentano's Chess Monthly, 1882.01, p465-466, as part of the 60 or so Morphy games found by Reichhelm.

The New York Daily Graphic published it in 1885.10.04 as Steinitz-Amateur with the following heading: "A brilliant game at odds of QR. The following remarkable game, which has been erroneously ascribed to Paul Morphy, was played by Mr. Steinitz and a well known London amateur, and appeared in the London Era on June 14, 1863.

Jay Whitehead found it twice, once as a Morphy game and once as a Steinitz game: Game 02819 as Morphy-NN Game 02845 as Steinitz-Rock

I recall reading an article where Reichhelm defended himself against plagiarism charges by Steinitz over a game and Reichhelm claimed that Morphy had played it before Steinitz (I'm trying to find that article now).

And the column found by <redwhitechess> ...mentions the game as being played four times by Reichhelm, Morphy, Steinitz and Paul's uncle.

Oct-18-13  redwhitechess: <jnpope> thanks for more infos, indeed it said in the article.
Oct-18-13  kjr63: 9...Na5? 10.Bxf7+ mate
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: Here is the Reichhelm-Walker version:

Reichhelm even notes that it was identical to a Steinitz game he published several months earlier. Interestingly he makes no mention at this time of a Morphy version of this game

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: From the International Chess Magazine, 1885.05, p143:

<For my game occurred at the Divan, in London, about 1862 or 1863, and was played against a Mr. Rock, whose name, as usual in case of weak amateurs, was not mentioned when it was published in the Illustrated London News, which had at the time the most widely read chess column all over the world, for it was edited by Staunton, and not by a Duffer. It was afterward also published in Howard Taylor's splendid collection entitled: "Chess Brilliants." Poor Morphy was at the time alive, and nobody dreamt that he intended to give up chess altogether. Yet the game had stood unchallenged for about 20 years, when Reichhelm contributed it to Brentano's as a Morphy game, with a note saying that he believed it occurred, among others, to Steinitz.>

Steinitz says Reichhelm claimed the game came from an old column. Steinitz then continues:

<It was just possible that some enterprising chess editor, who wished to attract the public, did not consider my name good enough for that purpose, and placed the name of Morphy on one of my games. However, now Mr. Reichhelm states that he received the game from "a brother collector." Mr. Eugene B. Cook informs me that he principally assisted Mr. Reichhelm in collecting Morphy's games, but that he was not the one who discovered "the coincidence.">

Steinitz pressed his investigation and from the International Chess Magazine, 1885.06, p175-176:

<...Mr. Cook has discovered, on examining some of his old correspondence, that it was he who sent the Morphy-Evans to Mr. Reichhelm.>

... and further down, p176:

<Nor has a title of real evidence come forward to connect positively Paul Morphy with the particular Evans coincidence as Mr. Cook admits to me in his letter. On the contrary, it is ascribed to his Uncle Ernest Morphy, and supposed to have been played in 1862, though first published long after mine had appeared. Paul Morphy had retired in 1858, and if he had been known to have played the game, it would not have been allowed to appear under his uncles name without a protest.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: The third incarnation, Ernest Morphy vs. P. Shaub, was published in The Dubuque Chess Journal of November 1873.

It appears that Cook copied this as a PM game and sent it to Reichhelm. This may be how the A.P. Ford game also appeared in Reichhelm's collection. It is the first game given in the Journal's Ernest Morphy feature.

Apr-01-14  yureesystem: It is a masterpiece and very picturesque and beautiful aesthetic checkmate ending!! Paul Morphy was a true artist.
Sep-11-16  siegbert: This game deserves to be better known. It is a brilliant game.
Jun-06-18  RKnight: This game is a wonderful work of art by Morphy, and we should just appreciate it as such. Never mind that NN played weakly; how many of us could deliver such a game against comparably weak players? None, I dare say, certainly not I. There is beauty in chess.
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Even if this game wasn't actually played by Morphy, it could have been, had the English not fixed world chess. So it's a Morphy game, regardless.

The above comments appear to bear this out. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: UNORTHODOX (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Obds (Part 1)
by Penguincw
Five Bows Drawn with Deadly Aim......
from king bee's favorite games by king bee
The Hydra
from Not Really Morphy by Calli
Mine favorittpartier
by plipli
ShaiChess' favorite games
by ShaiChess
Morphy-NN (New York 1857) Evans Gambit Accepted
from ART of CHECKMATE by Chess Padawan
player0's favorite games
by player0
Tullius' favorite games
by Tullius
by djangsan
Pure Morphy
by saveyougod

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC