chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Kramnik vs Sergey Karjakin
20th Amber Tournament (Rapid) (2011) (rapid), Monaco MNC, rd 4, Mar-15
English Opening: King's English. Four Knights Variation Fianchetto Lines (A29)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 49 more Kramnik/Karjakin games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-15-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Well,this time,Kramnik is up three pawns.Let's see how this a draw.After 59...Rxa3 60.Rxa3 Bxa3 (see diagram below) then let's the endgame statistics are :

♔♙♙♙♙ vs. ♔♗♙

The superior side (in this case black) wins only 11.6% of the time.

A draw occurs 37.5% of the time.

The inferior side (in this case white) wins 50.9% of the time.

I think there's something wrong with that.


click for larger view

Mar-15-11  stopaj25: is there a problem with this game how come kramnik did not win this???
Mar-15-11  Hesam7: (O_O) this is very worrying specially since it was rapid and not blindfold, truly horrific performance. And the candidate matches are less than two months away (I think they start May 3rd) ...

Here is a simple win (among many he missed): 37. Rd7


click for larger view

The bishop has to move and the only continuation that requires calculation is: 37. ... Bb4 38. Rc2! Ra8 39. Rcc7 and it is over.

Mar-15-11  fab4: Yeah could'nt believe it when the draw flashed up !
Mar-15-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: < stopaj25: is there a problem with this game how come kramnik did not win this??? >

I heard somewhere that this was all part of Karjakin's preparation.

Mar-15-11  metatron2: Seems like Kramnik has got himself a new habbit: To shut down his brain after getting a completely winning position.

We saw that happens in his game against Carlsen in London, and he himself spoke about his new problem of blowing away winning positions, but this one simply too much!

I mean dah ??! Every 1800 rated player could have won that endgame against Karjakin, if he was given the position after (for example) move 48. Like isn't that obvious that black's only counter play is his a-pawn, and if white exchanges that pawn for his d-pawn, he will "Only" remain 3 connected passed pawns up? So isn't that obvious that white should simply take that pawn with 49. Nxa3 and give his d3 pawn ?

OK, so instead, Kramnik decided to push his pawns first, while allowing black to block them with his K, but what was he thinking exactly on move 52? Maybe something like:

"OK, I can still take a3, I'll probably lose my (pushed) e+f pawns now, but will still remain with 2 pawns up and some very good winning chances. But I won't do that, instead, I'll check him on g8, push his K to an ideal centralized blockade position, then get my R back to the a-file, allowing him to take my d-pawn AND protect his a-pawn. Now isn't that a brilliant idea? lets play it!".

I didn't know that 2780 rated player is even capable of playing so awful. Not to mention that Kramnik is supposed to be a great endgame player. That is Simply Amazing.

Mar-15-11  fab4: as ,<Hesam7> states, simply 37.Rd7 wins it.

Maybe instead of 49.e5 49.Kg4 is better,looking to play Kf4 and d4.

Embarrsaaing endgame from Krammnik.

Mar-16-11  zoren: Certainly this game doesn't cancel out all or any of the brilliant Capablanca-esque endgames he has demonstrated in his career.

But it's still awful.

Mar-16-11  acirce: This might be one of the most unbelievable things I have ever seen in chess. Seriously.
Mar-21-11  hellopolgar: kramnik could have just took the pawn on move 37 with either rook and went on to win a knight + 4 pawn vs rook + 1 pawn ending.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC