chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Ding Liren vs Veselin Topalov
Gashimov Memorial (2018), Shamkir AZE, rd 3, Apr-21
Semi-Slav Defense: Normal Variation (D45)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Ding Liren/Topalov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-21-18  Count Wedgemore: <Mateo: < Stonehenge: 42...Ng4 43. f3 Qb8> Nice. 43...Qb8!! wins. Topalov thought for a long time but he 'underestimated' 42...Ng4, as they use to say.>

Yes, but ...Qb8 is still a big threat. White should probably play 44.Ke2 now, and accept ...Nxg3. Because he will lose the g3-pawn anyway after ...Qb8 followed by ...Qxg3.

Apr-21-18  thegoodanarchist: < offramp: WIll this be a huge triumph for the two knights against the two bishops?>

It seems not!

Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: Nxg3+ Ke2 Nxf1 Kxf1 and now the big question is whether b3+ or Qb1 directly
Apr-21-18  chessdgc2: 44. Ke2? Ke2? Looks like White's got a brave K....wonder if he's wearing something bulletproof?
Apr-21-18  Count Wedgemore: Now white cannot play 46.Kd1 to protect the bishop, because then 46...Nf2+ is a death blow. He has to give up the c1-bishop.
Apr-21-18  Marmot PFL: 10 years ago Topalov would have won this but time marches on inexorably
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: Judging by the icon, the King has macro cojones and a micro wong. Does that answer your question?
Apr-21-18  Count Wedgemore: Okay, this should be a draw. White can probably afford to keep the queen at a3 protecting the bishop. So he doesn't have to lose it. And then I do not see a path for black to queen his c-pawn. I predict a draw.
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: White's practically in zugzwang but he can keep playing Qa3-a1 and black doesn't have a clear attack, either
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: Unless the black king can reach g4
Apr-21-18  chessdgc2: Black can either draw or lose.....
Apr-21-18  Count Wedgemore: White should draw this by simply moving his king back and forth between e1 and f1.
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: Kg6, gopher it Topalov!
Apr-21-18  Count Wedgemore: Black can of course give a check on d1 and afterwards get his pawn to c2. But to get it to c1 is another matter entirely.
Apr-21-18  truepacifism: 56% chance that it is a draw and a snoozefest.
I prefer that someone win, however.
Apr-21-18  truepacifism: More like 100% at this point.
Apr-21-18  chessdgc2: will move 55 be bad luck for one of these guys?
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: You guys are crazy Topple-off is bringing the king in and he means business. White put his king on the right square because otherwise Kf5 Qf8+ Kg4 Qxg7+ Kh3 and white is lost
Apr-21-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: If Black plays c2, then White has Qa2/xe6+ for a perpetual in almost all lines. I don't see how Black can gain ground any other way. Kf5/g4 will likewise lead to Qxe6+ and a perp.
Apr-21-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: And, that's it. 15 straight draws.
Apr-21-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Thanks for the games CG.C
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: Dangnation, I thought Vaseline Top of Love had him there. Anyway it's a higher form of chess to sacrifice material for an idea, namely producing a quasi-zugzwang situation, but he was just one tempo behind.
Apr-21-18  chessdgc2: Is chess better today than it was 50 years ago? Hard to say, but defense certainly is and opening theory is also better. As far as calculating, creativity and risk-taking, I like the older games better :). Chessgames.com: Thanks for the cast!
Apr-21-18  ChessHigherCat: chessdgc2: Is chess better today than it was 50 years ago? Hard to say, but defense certainly is and opening theory is also better. As far as calculating, creativity and risk-taking, I like the older games better> I don't think you have to go back 50 years. This game is from only 22 years ago and they don't get much better than this:

Topalov vs Kasparov, 1996

Topalov just has to get his mojo back, like Austin Powers. Yeah, baby, yeah!

Apr-21-18  chessdgc2: ChessHigherCat: Yes, you’re correct, we don’t have to go back so far to find immortal games. Some people think chess was so much better before players started using teams, psychologists and computers...many of the “old-time” players were on their own and this is why I chose “50” years :) Chess is changing, though.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC