Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Christopher Kus
Number of games in database: 1
Years covered: 1991

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Christopher Kus
Search Google for Christopher Kus

United States of America

[what is this?]
Christopher Kus, formerly of Chicago and now living in California, is a National Master. He was on the chess team at Lane Technical High School in Chicago with Alberto A Artidiello, Kenneth Mohr, and Frederick Rhine, which won the Illinois State Championship in 1976 (Chris' senior year) and 1977.

 page 1 of 1; one game  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. C Kus vs Bisguier  ½-½541991Los AngelesC70 Ruy Lopez

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-30-14  The Last Straw: What is a *Chicago Master*?
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Our esteemed User: FSR might be able to shed some light on this mystery.....
Jun-30-14  FSR: I know Kus. We were teammates in high school, and have played three rated games: he crushed me when I was a high school freshman, then we had two short draws after I got stronger. A "Chicago master" is simply a master who lives in Chicago. From the USCF website, it appears that he has moved to California, and hasn't played a rated game since 2003.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: USCF master I presume.

I couldn't find a FIDE card for him. Did I miss it?

Jul-01-14  FSR: <zanzibar> AFAIK, he doesn't have a FIDE rating. Nor do I.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <FSR> yer right - can't find you either!

Maybe FIDE rated tournaments are more common on the two coasts than in the midwest?

PS- I think titles, if not FIDE, might be better understood if the national affiliation is used... "USCF National Master" vs "National Master".

Just my opinion of course.

Jul-01-14  FSR: <zanzibar> Maybe; there aren't a lot of them around here. <National Master> seems pretty self-explanatory to me - a master title conferred by the federation of whatever country the person lives in.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <FSR> there could be a snowball effect, since you need FIDE players to get FIDE ratings. Maybe more of the chess diaspora ended up on the East/West coasts.

I thought "National Master" was part of the title. For the record then, my pref would be "USCF Master" (or ECF/DSB/etc Master).

Jul-01-14  FSR: <zanzibar> That is the title. When one gets a rating of 2200 or above, the USCF sends one a certificate recognizing one as a "National Master."
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <FSR> Sorry Fred, but I messed up the search for your name in my FIDE data - you are there!

No FIDE rating, but two entries from 2013 give you a Rp of ~1900.

Jul-01-14  FSR: <zanzibar> Thanks. Not sure how you came up with ~1900. In those two tournaments, I had wins against players with FIDE ratings of 1933 and 1886, and draws with a 2028 and a 1952. (2333 + 2286 + 2028 + 1952)/4 is about 2150 if my math is correct.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <FSR> Generally, whenever dealing with a rating calculation one should be very careful.

When dealing with someone else's rating one should be doubly careful - which I wasn't. Humblest apologies.

OK, if you look on your FIDE card there are two tournaments listed - each of which has a ratings breakdown of you and your opponents:

<2013 Greater Midwest Classic (USA) Rosemont, Illinois 2 3 1986 August 2013>

<2013 NACA July - August Game 90 Friday Night Series (USA) Skokie, Illinois 1 1 1901 September 2013>

FIDE quotes the Rp for each tournament, 1986 and 1901. I intended to copy the highest and instead copied the lowest. (Again, apologies)

Actually, the best way to get a FIDE provisional is to take the average of the opponent's rating and your score (plus number of games) to the FIDE calculator:

or, more directly for an initial rating:

The FIDE initial rating is different from the USCF provisional (the latter uses the +400/-400 offsets for wins/losses). Instead, FIDE just uses the average of all your opponents:

Rc_ave = (1933+2028+1952+1886)/4 = 1959

W (score) = 3 (+2 -0 =2)

N = 4

Rp = 1989

So I nicked you about 100 points, rather unfairly.

But maybe there's a couple of useful lessons - first, for me to be more careful. And to compare FIDE's more conservative initial rating vs USCF's.

Jul-02-14  FSR: <zanzibar> I score 3-1 against opponents rated 1959, and FIDE gives me a performance rating of 1989 (a walloping 30 points higher) for that? Bizarre. But thanks for the information - good to know.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <FSR> And to finish, suppose you have a FIDE rating of 2000, and K_val = 30.

Here's FIDE's rather stingy rating bump for wins/losses against various opponents:

1800 : +7.2 / -22.8
2000 : +15 / -15
2200 : +22.8 / -7.2
2400 : +27.6 / -2.4

So, even if you won 6 games in a row from a 2000 rated opp, you still wouldn't gain 100 points.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> needs to whale on an old retired fish like me--that would give him a nice bump, if I can still remember how the pieces move!
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Yeah, I found a "whale" too:

Looking at my archives, last played 9 games in the rating period prior to 2001-07. Might be ripe for the picking... but then again...

Gotta be careful with these "old" whales though - they can catch you unawares if their danger (2187) is foolishly underestimated.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Gotta worry about the young'uns too...

Clearly <nine-year-old FM Nodirbek Abdusattorov> is under-rated.

The rate of increase in his rating is perhaps "too slow".

I know that once-upon-a-time older USCF masters staged a semi-revolt due to rating's instability introduced by the influx of young hot-shots like Abdusattorov.

Perhaps there's no good solution to this problem. But the FIDE 2600 GM's lost ~ -27.6 rating points vs -15 rating points if Abdusattorov really was a 2600 player.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <zanzibar> You may have read or heard an old John A Curdo saying: 'Gotta get 'em while they're young'.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Nine years old is almost embryonic. (Wonder who his coach is.)

BTW- the CB article was written by a 10th grader!

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC