< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 479 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
May-10-09
 | | Domdaniel: All of that stuff happened when I "wasn't playing chess" so it comes with a label attached. <Warning -- Subject may have imagined this>. Subject was something of an amateur imagineer in those days. But the dark square bishops found me and dragged me back in -- or down -- or up. Whatever direction chess has to the so-called real world and its irreal extensions. |
|
May-13-09 | | mack: <D'you want some?>
Heh, brilliant. Your mother seems to be a more subtle drug dealer than some, though. Last time I bought anything like that - about a month ago - Mr Pharmacist quite literally tossed my little sachet of happiness to me from ten feet away in a pub. I was alarmed, as you'd imagine. I mean, you've met me -- can you imagine how I'd get along in prison? There'd be hilarious consequences, I'm sure. I met Greg for the first time since October last weekend, by the way, and we're both definitely playing Galway again this year... |
|
May-16-09
 | | ChessBookForum: I am a book.
Fear me! |
|
May-16-09
 | | Domdaniel: Sorry, <Bookyforum> me old chum, but *fear* (unlike 'wear' and 'tear' and an occasional 'sear') is not on the agenda where books are concerned. I've had *love affairs* with the dam' things, though not usually of a sadomasochistic nature. I also have a large collection of new and used ones at home, which is not generally the case regarding other entities with which I have had love affairs. But each to their own.
Just wait until I actually get around to *writing* one, and changing from the passive to active role, sub to dom ... ehhh, <as it were>. |
|
May-16-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Books aren't dominatrixes <Dom> and there's no <submissive> attitude in your IRON DICTATORSHIP of <Frogspawn>.
I'd counsel, however, against a love affair with a <purple cartoon avatar>. Robbie Robertson:
"Take what you want, and you leave the rest..."
(did you know Robbie is from Canadia? Not Levon though. I think Levon is from an Elton John song) |
|
May-16-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Fear Me!>
Who *are* you, anyhow? Yahweh? Mephistopheles? ("Why, this is hell. Nor am I out of it")
Nintendo?
For verily it is coded: Nintendo is a jealous God.
"I ain't lookin' to compete with you, Beat or cheat or mistreat you..." - <Bob Dylan, My Back Pages> ++++
<One's Back Pages>
by
Charles Windsor Battenburg de Wales
One's pages will bow
And scrape for you,
Tread your grape for you,
Jape for you and tape for you
One is looking to meet your kin
Measure your chin and your risk of sin.
All one can really bear to do
Is beget one's heir on you
And beget one's spare on you.
One has no great desire to force you
One will marry and divorce you
One's Mum is monarch
Of the glen
So, er, *how about it*, then? |
|
May-16-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Jess> I know a guy who once wrote a novel called Levon. He may have been hoping that the movie rights would be snapped up by Jesse Helms (any relation?) and Variety would write: <Helms Helms Levon>. |
|
May-16-09
 | | Domdaniel: Iron Dictatorship? Moi?
Fe.
Anyone wants to doggy-paddle across the Straits of Zeitnot using a blow-up Bobby Fischer/Judit Polgar doll as a float, feel free. |
|
May-16-09
 | | Domdaniel: Was it Neil 'Schwarz' Diamond who wrote:
You are a hook
I am a Crook
You are a Book
I am a Duke
Fear Me.
No? OK, give me a 2nd guess. Prospero? No, wait, he's a fictional person invented by Bill Shakespeare for Peter Greenaway. I'll try ... the Duke: John Wayne? (An occasional chess player once described by his agent as 'a good country player', whatever that meant -- either he was a GM with olympiad experience, or he tended to open with 1.a4, the Meadow Hay Attack.) Note how everything connects, incidentally. Wayne's final film before his death from cancer was The Shootist, in which he played an elderly gunfighter dying of cancer. His name? J.B. Books. No relation to the guy in <Indiana Jones and the Barn of the Amish> -- eh, sorry, I meant Peter Weir's excellent film Witness, starring Harrison Ford as John Book. Or the great Finnish master Eero Böök, with umlauts, most famous for being on the receiving end of one of Alekhine's best attacks. OK, he also beat Keres once, and received an honorary GM award in his 70s. I'd quite like one of those, but of course I already have a GM title. Back to the Bööks. |
|
May-16-09
 | | Domdaniel: Another great writer, Dennis Potter, revealed in his final interview that he had named his cancer 'Rupert' after a certain media mogul. Wayne could have called his 'Truman' -- Harry S was ultimately responsible for the nuclear tests that irradiated Monument Valley, where Wayne and John Ford went on blithely making Westerns. Now *that* was a Truman Show.
Peter Weir again. Too much, too much. |
|
May-17-09 | | everyone else: Well Ok=
But are you sure you are keeping me in mind? |
|
May-17-09 | | mack: <I've had *love affairs* with the dam' things> For sure you end up on a slippery slope once you shove a finger in your first dyke. |
|
May-17-09
 | | Open Defence: <Harry S was ultimately responsible for the nuclear tests> not to mention the <tests> in Japan |
|
May-17-09
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Any more of these innuendos
(in *which* end, I always wonder) and I shall feel obliged to challenge you to a duel. Isolani at 279841 paces, at the crack of noon. Meanwhile I'll raise the tone by imagining how Sam Beckett would handle the situation. Scene. A crossroads with a dead tree in a flat country. Ideally, the whole country should be set on stilts -- to suggest post-apocalyptic Dutchness, or an author with no understanding of the economics of set design, or both. Two tramps appear.
Tramp A: When you are in the last ditch there is nothing to do but ... [a two-dot pause]
[beat]
[a longer pause, a three-dotter]
[another beat]
Tramp A: Ummmmm.
Tramp B: Ehhhhh?
A: Yes fugget, I've forgotten my lines again. I can't for the life of me remember what one is supposed to do with the last dyke. B: Ditch.
A: Eh?
B: Ditch, not dyke. And you're supposed to sing.
A: Seems a bit daft.
B: It does. But you know who to blame for that.
[pause]
[whispering]
A: Himself?
B: Himself exactly.
[they sing] |
|
May-18-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Connectivity> As we all know, chess, music and maths produce rare prodigies. The young Mozart teaming up with Jimi Hendrix to write The Star Spangled Banner at the age of six ... - I am a *star*, Herr Schnippisch, and I will my Hotelzimmer trash! Und my Banner I will Spangle! When do I a Sausage become? And there's young Gauss, figuring out at eight that n(n+1)/2 equals the sum of all integers from 1 to n, after his teacher asked the class to add all the numbers from 1 to 100. Which is 5050, as anyone can see. Or Fischer 'getting good' - as good as a GM, nearly as good as Carlsen - at about 12. And playing the game of the century. And Capablanca, using induction to work out the rules at four and remaining unbeaten - more or less - until Alekhine caught him in the Preparation Trap 30 years later. Also Sammy Reshevsky, Wesley So, Carlsen, Negi, Caruana, Karjakin, Arturito Pomar, and whoever else you think qualifies. Me, I'm naturally more interested in the veterans, the old guys: Korchnoi, Smyslov, the ones who kept on keeping on, or even got better at an advanced age. Nothing, however, compares with the French writer Paul de Kock -- his name allows a couple of smutty puns in Joyce's Ulysses, and his books weren't much better. In the spirit of research, however - the spirit that makes small boys look up 'fart' in the dictionary and learn something about methane or perhaps hydrogen sulfide - I, ah, happened to check out Paul de Kock on wikipedia. Where I learned that "Paul de Kock began life as a banker's clerk." I'm no expert. But -- while this is clearly prodigious, I would suggest that any child showing such proclivities nowadays should be gently steered in another direction. As long as they're less than a month old there's still time for chess. You really wouldn't want a banker in your Babygros or Onesies. They may promise to turn the Onesies into Twosies and Threesies, but before you know where you are it's negative equity and the Minus Tensies. |
|
May-18-09
 | | Domdaniel: I don’t suppose that Ralf Appel ever played Arturo Pomar-Salamanca ?
No? Pluck it. |
|
May-18-09
 | | Open Defence: what do you think of the band "Madness" ?
I loved their well known songs like "Uncle Sam", "It must be love", "Our House" etc but there was one which was called "Lamp post" I think.. very nice song... |
|
May-18-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Deffi> Madness reformed recently, didn't they? As in played gigs? As another middle-aged nutter on the comeback trail I should be sympathetic, but I never realy liked them much. Their hits etc were less objectionable than most hits, but that's all I can say for them. |
|
May-21-09
 | | Domdaniel: <I never realy liked them much>
Oh crap, I'm tourning into Quention Terrentino. I mean, realy. |
|
May-22-09 | | Red October: I see you have acquired my spelling skills |
|
May-23-09 | | Eyal: Hi Dom, I think you might find this article on fluctuations in the popularity of chess openings interesting: http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/w... (as well as some of the comments posted there in response). I recall you pondering about this subject several times, and there's a specific example related to the Winawer... I find it a bit irritating how the author keeps saying that things need "further research" without really committing to anything, but it's still quite suggestive and discusses the question from an original perspective. |
|
May-23-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Eyal> ... sounds interesting, thanks... as for 'further research', I read somewhere a devastating put-down of the uselessness and vacuity of that phrase - since everything needs further research - but I can't recall where I saw it. I'll let you know if further research unearths it. |
|
May-23-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Eyal> Yeah ... the article sort of slithers away from the crucial point, which is the popularity of rival openings. I don't doubt that people play particular openings to seem cool, or different, or deep, or wacky, or Kasparovesque, etc -- but variations get chosen for more pragmatic reasons, I suspect. Sometimes an opening line apparently goes out of fashion because an alternative line has been revived. I think that's what happened with the Winawer, btw -- the ...0-0 line used to have a poor reputation, but new resources were found - at which point it became more popular than the alternatives. There are a lot of confounding factors. And I've stopped believing in memes ... or, rather, I don't think that superficial analogies between cultural and biological evolution are strong enough to permit an actual science of memetics. Chess openings aren't even properly described or differentiated, most of the time. The 'most played opening' according to CG's statistics page is no such thing: it's just the most frequently used name. Often wrongly. But thanks -- this is interesting territory. |
|
May-23-09
 | | Domdaniel: <Jess> -- <"Take what you want, and you leave the rest..." > *Quid voliunt grabiturque restum remnant.*
I'm going to put it on my coat of arms, with a b-pawn rampant. |
|
May-24-09 | | Red October: my b pawn is poisoned |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 479 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|