|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 15 OF 16 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Aug-05-11 | | DrMAL: <vanytchouck> Having lived in Paris for a few years I believe the next word is "Connard." |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | JoergWalter: A french friend explained it like that:
1. there are people who are smart but lazy - they are not complete. 2. there are people who are stupid but very busy - they are not complete
Whenever somebody is stupid and lazy - he is complete = "le total". he has got the goods. |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | DrMAL: Oui, très vrai cela, un con n'est pas un con réel que si il est un con complet et total. LOL. |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | Valmy: I have never heard about "le total" "la totale" yes but "le total"? |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | JoergWalter: <Valmy> i apologize for my french. but this what i learned in Chilly-Mazarin. |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | timhortons: <Yes - Kramnik could have gotten a draw ... seems he was determined to get the full point.> show it, show it, show your analysis aj.
tabarnack! |
|
Aug-06-11
 | | LIFE Master AJ: JoergWalter = Insane, lunatic = gross, basic troll. |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | JoergWalter: <LMAJ> i understand you perfectly. the deletion of the Crisler game is a great loss to the chess loving part of mankind. Like many others I have a hardcopy for my personal files, so this inspiring brilliancy is not lost.
However, I added mr. crisler's rating of 1563 for complete data. Is this correct and approved by you? |
|
Aug-06-11
| | LIFE Master AJ: <jw> probably equals <lennonfan> or even <hayton3> |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | JoergWalter: <LMAJ> i don't know <lennonfan> or <hayton3>. Anyway, i'm curious why you do not answer simple questions. e.g.
1. did mr. crisler have a rating of 1563 at the time your game was played?
2. Did you know about Morphy's and Steinitz annotations of Paulsen vs. Morphy (with Qd3 x Bf3)?
3. Did you know that Steinitz vs. Rock was an exact copy of Morphy vs. NN from 1857 (odds of QR)? Answers can be simple yes or no. no need to go for the pulitzer prize with your prose. |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | Everyone: Don’t argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | JoergWalter: hi <everyone>. i'm rather a nobody : www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEsv3kcFSBU |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | DrMAL: <JeorgWalter> LOL. It seems clear why USCF should be altogether rid of the term "Life Master." |
|
Aug-07-11
| | LIFE Master AJ: Q: <<Anyway, i'm curious why you do not answer simple questions.> A: Its not possible to have a meaningful conversation with a retard ... or someone who have given themselves a full frontal lobotomy. |
|
Aug-07-11
| | LIFE Master AJ: And - by your constant criticisms, insults, (etc.) you have revealed yourself to be ,,, nothing more than a base troll. (And like cockroaches, trolls should only be eradicated, not placated.) |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | vanytchouck: <JoergWalter: A french friend explained it like that:
(...)he is complete = "le total".(...)>
I still don't get it. Maybe the expression <"un c*o*n fini"> wich can be translated in "an acomplished pr#ck " or. In french, "le total" is used for "the whole", "the sum" but no one would ever say "il est le total". <JoergWalter: <Valmy> i apologize for my french. but this what i learned in Chilly-Mazarin.> I know Chilly-Mazarin very well as i'm working in Morangis wich is just the closest city. |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | JoergWalter: <vanytchouck> maybe "le total" was just an invention of my friend and he was joking. like when i asked whether the sign "A" on a car means "amateur".
no it is for "apprentice". "amateur" they use for "not quite finished in his head"="stupid". |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | JoergWalter: <LIFE MASTER AJ> are you the Pensacola version of Franz Gutmayer? |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | DrMAL: B Suhle vs NN, 1859 Suhle (n) 1. Ridiculously overrated in chess. 2. Patzer incognito. |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | DrMAL: Careful <JoergWalter> according to the moronic website Chessmetrics Gutmeyer's "rating" was over 2400. Chessmetrics makes the absolutely LUDICROUS assumption that the quality of play among top 10 players in the world was ALWAYS roughly equivalent to Linares in 2005! http://chessmetrics.com/cm/CM2/Form... It assumes a person's RANKING makes the player equivalent to roughly the same ranking today. As such, it "calibrates" each player to the ratings of today, ignoring all differences knowledge and quality of play from then to now. From his GAMES, Gutmayer's quality of play was certainly less than 2200 by today's standard and very likely less than 2000 as well. Chessmetrics should contain a big WARNING sign, indicating it's an absolute joke to try and use it's "ratings." But, like Gutmayer, "Life Master" AJ is also ridiculously inflated, the quality of his games reflects a bookish glorified patzer and the quality of his posts reflect an egomaniac who thinks he really IS some sort of great master! |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | JoergWalter: <DrMal> no inflation in the world brings the Pensacola variant to 2400. Reti describes good old Franz:
a) posing as authorised apostle of the old masters
b) unsrupulous in declaring his ignorance as ultimate wisdom c) what is a revelation to him must be new for anybody else and this little beam of light into the twilight of his mind makes dozens of websites. |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | theagenbiteofinwit: <A: Its not possible to have a meaningful conversation with a retard ... or someone who have given themselves a full frontal lobotomy.> It's not a droll, witty, or even a mildly clever insult to call someone a "retard." For one who claims to be a Christian it is surely odd behavior that you use a derogatory slur named at the least fortunate of us to insult people. |
|
Aug-07-11
| | LIFE Master AJ: Back to the event ... has anyone figured out why Kramnik always seems to do well at Dortmund? |
|
Aug-07-11
| | LIFE Master AJ: http://www.chessbase.com/eventlist.... 2011 |
|
| Aug-07-11 | | shach matov: <LMAJ>
the reason is obvious: Dortmund is much weaker than tourneys like Tata, London, Linares, etc. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 15 OF 16 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
