chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Amber Tournament (Rapid) Tournament

Gata Kamsky7/11(+5 -2 =4)[games]
Viswanathan Anand7/11(+4 -1 =6)[games]
Levon Aronian7/11(+5 -2 =4)[games]
Vladimir Kramnik6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[games]
Sergey Karjakin6/11(+4 -3 =4)[games]
Magnus Carlsen6/11(+3 -2 =6)[games]
Veselin Topalov5/11(+1 -2 =8)[games]
Alexander Morozevich4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[games]
Vasyl Ivanchuk4.5/11(+1 -3 =7)[games]
Peter Leko4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[games]
Teimour Radjabov4/11(+1 -4 =6)[games]
Yue Wang4/11(+1 -4 =6)[games]

 page 2 of 3; games 26-50 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
26. Morozevich vs Karjakin 0-1682009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E37 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
27. Kamsky vs Leko 1-0962009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C85 Ruy Lopez, Exchange Variation Doubly Deferred (DERLD)
28. Anand vs Ivanchuk 1-0472009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C18 French, Winawer
29. Radjabov vs Y Wang 0-1412009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
30. Kramnik vs Topalov ½-½542009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
31. Radjabov vs Anand 0-1742009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B13 Caro-Kann, Exchange
32. Morozevich vs Carlsen  ½-½252009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
33. Topalov vs Leko  ½-½592009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C90 Ruy Lopez, Closed
34. Y Wang vs Ivanchuk ½-½692009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E12 Queen's Indian
35. Kramnik vs Kamsky ½-½462009Amber Tournament (Rapid)A15 English
36. Karjakin vs Aronian 0-1662009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C67 Ruy Lopez
37. Aronian vs Kramnik 0-1412009Amber Tournament (Rapid)A13 English
38. Ivanchuk vs Topalov ½-½322009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C85 Ruy Lopez, Exchange Variation Doubly Deferred (DERLD)
39. Carlsen vs Y Wang 1-0392009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
40. Leko vs Morozevich 1-0402009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
41. Kamsky vs Radjabov 1-0612009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B32 Sicilian
42. Anand vs Karjakin ½-½612009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B90 Sicilian, Najdorf
43. Karjakin vs Kamsky 1-0522009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
44. Kramnik vs Anand ½-½152009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
45. Radjabov vs Aronian  ½-½572009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C55 Two Knights Defense
46. Y Wang vs Leko  ½-½312009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
47. Topalov vs Carlsen ½-½282009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
48. Morozevich vs Ivanchuk  ½-½432009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D35 Queen's Gambit Declined
49. Ivanchuk vs Kramnik  ½-½652009Amber Tournament (Rapid)A29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
50. Carlsen vs Karjakin 1-0622009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
 page 2 of 3; games 26-50 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-26-09  Kaspablanca: vesivialvy: what blitz chess are you talking about?
Mar-26-09  KamikazeAttack: <KingG: Topalov isn't that successful at rapid, and isn't particularly good at blindfold either, so it's no surprise that he doesn't do so well here.>

Topalov is quite good in Blindfold.

He won it 3 times in the past.

Mar-26-09  Vakus: <AuN1> - no need to crush a conspiracy theory, just read the articles on that issue in ChessVibes, ChessBase, ChessPro. And even if Topalov could win that, a draw in rapid section would be well enough for Aronian's first place (check the tie-break)
Mar-26-09  karoaper: From Amberchess2009.com :

Score after Round 11

Blindfold
---------------
1. Aronian 7
Carlsen 7
Kramnik 7
4. Anand 6½
Morozevich 6½
6. Leko 5½
Topalov 5½
8. Ivanchuk 5
Radjabov 5
10. Karjakin 4½
11. Wang Yue 3½
12. Kamsky 3

Rapid
---------
1. Anand 7
Aronian 7
Kamsky 7
4. Kramnik 6½
5. Carlsen 6
Karjakin 6
7. Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 4½
Leko 4½
Morozevich 4½
11. Radjabov 4
Wang Yue 4

Combined
----------
1. Aronian 14
2. Anand 13½
Kramnik 13½
4. Carlsen 13
5. Morozevich 11
6. Karjakin 10½
Topalov 10½
8. Kamsky 10
Leko 10
10. Ivanchuk 9½
11. Radjabov 9
12. Wang Yue 7½

Mar-27-09  KamikazeAttack: Congrats to Aronian, the Houdini of our time. He is the Lord of the Manor as far as Amber is concerned now.

2 srt8 wins in all categories is very, very impressive indeed - excellent.

However, old pros Anand and Kramnik continue to prove their mettle in their specialised categories.

Anand - 5 rapid wins in 6 years.
Kramnik - 3 BF wins in 3 years (Hat-trick).

Mar-27-09  vesivialvy93: kasablanca ....sorry , you're right , it's rapid chess , not blitz ...i need a good night sleep ;-)
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <why do they call Morozevich a blindfold expert?, what merits does he have that seperates him from for example Kramnik(who is not referred to as an expert)>

<I think Kramnik is the ral expert>

<there were only two exceptional results by Moro in blindfold, 2004 and 2006>

I don't really agree with the comparison that is supposed to show that Kramnik is the blindfold expert of the two... Morozevich's +7 in 2002 was also a rather exceptional result considering that that was the first time he participated.

Morozevich's blindfold scores: +7 +3 +6 +1 +8 +3 +2 +2. That's an average of +4. Kramnik's scores have been very slightly worse on average as can be seen above (but of course more or less just as excellent).

I think both Kramnik and Morozevich are excellent blindfold players, but I would consider Morozevich as the expert of the two since Kramnik always has been top five in all disciplines. He has performed very strong results in classical, rapid and blitz the last decade. Morozevich hasn't been top five in anything else than blindfold and there he has for much of the time been #1, or at worst #2, so I think it would be strange not to see him as a blindfold expert.

One could just look at his scores against Anand and Topalov, he is 12-1 against these strong blindfold players that both have an even score against Kramnik. He is 2-3 against Kramnik himself though, but that isn't too bad either.

Mar-27-09  anandrulez: http://members.aon.at/sfischl/blind...

Blindfold performance of players from 2000-2008

Mar-27-09  square dance: maybe someone who was into that sort of thing could calculate their updated blindfold ratings. :-)
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <updated blindfold ratings>

After Amber 2009 it should be

Morozevich: 2860 in 88 games

Kramnik: 2823 in 143 games

Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: The top five in rapid chess 2000-2009 should look like this (Fischl's stats plus Amber):

Anand 2816 in 406 games

Kasparov 2803 in 104 games

Aronian 2781 in 119 games

Kramnik 2767 in 209 games

Ivanchuk 2764 in 332 games

Mar-27-09  DCP23: <percyblakeney: <updated blindfold ratings>>

Thanks!

Mar-27-09  square dance: thanks pb.
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <DCP23> <square dance>

You're welcome!

Mar-27-09  KamikazeAttack: <anandrulez: http://members.aon.at/sfischl/blind...

Blindfold performance of players from 2000-2008
>

I wonder if Bu would be invited to Amber next year.

Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: this is...
a man's...
world...
i said this...
is a man's...
world...
but it...
would be...
nothing without...
women or...
girl...
Mar-28-09  cuendillar: it would....
be easier...
to read if...
you...
wrote it...
on one line...
with ...
no...
dots...
Mar-28-09  Jim Bartle: I don't mind the dots or the one-word lines that much. What drive me nuts are the 400-word posts written in a single paragraph!

I gave up reading "Remembrance of Things Past" just because there weren't any paragraph breaks.

Mar-28-09  khursh: - .... .- -. -.- ... / .--- .. -- / -... .- .-. - .-.. . -.-.--

http://www.omnicron.com/~ford/java/...

Mar-28-09  Vakus: .-.. . ...- --- -. / .- .-. --- -. .. .- -. / .. ... / - .... . / -.-. .... .- -- .--. .. --- -.

:)

Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: so many...
dots...
Mar-28-09  I Like Fish: dots are there...
to breathe in...
air...
Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: indeed...
Mar-30-09  ajile: <Vakus: <AuN1> - no need to crush a conspiracy theory, just read the articles on that issue in ChessVibes, ChessBase, ChessPro. And even if Topalov could win that, a draw in rapid section would be well enough for Aronian's first place (check the tie-break)>

Yes there are a bunch of people talking about this conspiracy idea. Thing is why don't any of the chess websites (this one included) show all the prize money for all the places? I don't get it since most other sports clearly show how the prize money is divided. Why is chess different? And if we knew what the prizes were then we could better gauge how much money Topalov would lose by dropping a place in order to drop Kramnik out of the lead.

Apr-17-09  jussu: <ajile> - I have always been irritated when reading tennis news and finding that quite a proportion of the text is reserved to reports on how much money was at the stake. This is low, I want to read about the sport, not to browse in the sportsmen's wallets.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 60)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC