Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

US Championship Tournament

Hikaru Nakamura8.5/11(+6 -0 =5)[games]
Gata Kamsky7.5/11(+6 -2 =3)[games]
Alexander Onischuk6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[games]
Yury Shulman6/11(+1 -0 =10)[games]
Aleksandr Lenderman6/11(+2 -1 =8)[games]
Varuzhan Akobian6/11(+4 -3 =4)[games]
Ray Robson5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[games]
Robert Lee Hess5/11(+3 -4 =4)[games]
Alejandro Ramirez Alvarez4/11(+2 -5 =4)[games]
Gregory Kaidanov4/11(+2 -5 =4)[games]
Alexander Stripunsky3.5/11(+2 -6 =3)[games]
Yasser Seirawan3.5/11(+2 -6 =3)[games] Chess Event Description
US Championship (2012)

Previous edition: US Championship (Knock-out) (2011). Next: US Chess Championship (2013). See also US Championship (Women) (2012).

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Shulman vs Kaidanov ½-½842012US ChampionshipE11 Bogo-Indian Defense
2. Lenderman vs Robson 1-0642012US ChampionshipD97 Grunfeld, Russian
3. V Akobian vs Seirawan 1-0562012US ChampionshipD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. Kamsky vs A Ramirez Alvarez 1-0392012US ChampionshipB42 Sicilian, Kan
5. Nakamura vs R Hess 1-0332012US ChampionshipC51 Evans Gambit
6. Stripunsky vs Onischuk 0-1112012US ChampionshipB11 Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4
7. Seirawan vs R Hess 0-1472012US ChampionshipE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
8. Kaidanov vs Stripunsky 1-0532012US ChampionshipD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
9. V Akobian vs Shulman  ½-½422012US ChampionshipD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
10. Onischuk vs Lenderman  ½-½392012US ChampionshipD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
11. A Ramirez Alvarez vs Nakamura ½-½402012US ChampionshipD76 Neo-Grunfeld, Nxd5, 7.O-O Nb6
12. Robson vs Kamsky ½-½282012US ChampionshipB27 Sicilian
13. Kamsky vs Onischuk 1-0482012US ChampionshipD02 Queen's Pawn Game
14. Shulman vs Seirawan 1-0422012US ChampionshipE17 Queen's Indian
15. R Hess vs A Ramirez Alvarez  ½-½412012US ChampionshipB42 Sicilian, Kan
16. Stripunsky vs V Akobian 1-0402012US ChampionshipC03 French, Tarrasch
17. Nakamura vs Robson 1-0492012US ChampionshipB76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
18. Lenderman vs Kaidanov  ½-½302012US ChampionshipA33 English, Symmetrical
19. Shulman vs Stripunsky  ½-½772012US ChampionshipD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
20. Seirawan vs A Ramirez Alvarez 1-0932012US ChampionshipD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
21. Robson vs R Hess 1-0342012US ChampionshipC54 Giuoco Piano
22. Onischuk vs Nakamura ½-½412012US ChampionshipA10 English
23. V Akobian vs Lenderman  ½-½332012US ChampionshipD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
24. Kaidanov vs Kamsky 1-0482012US ChampionshipD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
25. Kamsky vs V Akobian 1-0502012US ChampionshipC67 Ruy Lopez
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-19-12  suenteus po 147: Pretty impressive performance by Nakamura. Not only did he finish first, undefeated with six wins, but he had two games over 100 moves, and only one draw under 40 moves. That's the kind of champion many American chess fans want: a fighter and a winner.
May-19-12  Jim Bartle: "two games over 100 moves"

Just to be picky, one of those was because he was just goofing around toward the end instead of taking the draw several moves earlier.

May-19-12  BlackSheep: Congrats Naka noone was even near you the wins against Kamsky and Seirawan were great games of accuracy and style .
May-19-12  Atking: Yes it was great! Thanks and congratulations to Naka for his fighting spirit and his wonderful result. (No lost! And I keep the impression the one with Lenderman was to Nakamura's advantage. In brief not a 11/0 but still a Fischer like performance).
May-19-12  solskytz: <Suenteus> Agreed!!

Although he would have to overcome his nemesis Carlsen before he can actually reach that height.

Interesting times!

<Jim Bartle>

well yes - but that's already a point of style. A little bit like sleeping with a teddy bear at 25... but still cute


only did 11:0 in ONE US championship - now in each one of the eight he played and won.

May-19-12  ooda: Congrats to Naka, this was a thoroughly enjoyable tournament.

Nakamura has had a great run for the past 18 months or so and I think he is showing more and more that he has the potential to become a WC challenger and perhaps even champ.

Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: Congratulations, Hikaru. This victory certainly reinforces your position as #1 in the U.S. and also a world class contender. Chess fans certainly appreciate your fighting style.
May-19-12  parmetd: Congrats to Hikaru.

My final score was 28/66

May-20-12  LIFE Master AJ: "Nak" played fighting chess all the way. He has all my kudo's and I have nothing negative to say ... CONGRATS!!!!!

Let us hope - in a year or two - that he will be on the stage in Moscow (or where-ever that it is to be held) ... playing for the World Championships.

May-20-12  LIFE Master AJ: Six wins ... versus only five draws ... that's just whacked.
May-20-12  PinnedPiece: In a 3-0-1 scoring system, the final results are somewhat changed:

Nakamura _ _ _ 23
Kamsky _ _ _ _ 21
Onischuk _ _ _ 16
Akobian _ _ _ _16
Lenderman _ _ 14
Robson _ _ _ _ 14
Shulman _ _ _ _13
Lee _ _ _ _ _ _ 13
Ramirez-Alvarez 10
Kaidanov _ _ _ _10
Stripunsky _ _ _ 9
Seirawan _ _ _ _ 9

May-20-12  parmetd: No one cares about 3-1-0. Yury tied for 4th. Live with it.
May-20-12  dx9293: Amen, <parmetd>!

I have long said that 3-1-0 is an abomination and a crime against chess.

May-20-12  parmetd: so what was everyone's favorite games?
Mine was 1. Lenderman-Robson 2. Kamsky-Seirawan
May-20-12  dx9293: <parmetd> Seirawan simply was caught, so I'll go with my man Alex L!
May-21-12  Riverbeast: <I have long said that 3-1-0 is an abomination and a crime against chess>

Beg to disagree

I think it may be the greatest antidote to 'draw death' in chess, to come around in the last 100 years

Since Capablanca was complaining about it...

But throughout history, revolutionary ideas have always met resistance from the 'purists'

May-21-12  dx9293: <Riverbeast> I am most definitely a purist when it comes to the scoring system in chess!

3-1-0 is just for people who hate draws.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Riverbeast> <I think it may be the greatest antidote to 'draw death' in chess, to come around in the last 100 years>

Is there statistically significant evidence that the +3 =1 -0 system does really lead to fewer draws than the classical +1 =0.5 -0 system?

I mean, some systematic comparison between tournaments with the new system and tournaments of equal strength played at around the same time using the old system...

By now, enough tournaments have been played with the alternative system for a comparable statistical record to exist, right?

May-21-12  MORPHYEUS: No, the greatest antidote will be my "punt" system.

It also uses the 3 1 0. That is 3 points for classical win, 1 point for the armageddon blitz "punt" win, and 0 for the loss. This is incorporated in the London Rule, that is no agreed draw till move 40.

May-21-12  Illogic: <RiverBeast> What has been revolutionary about it? Plenty of tournaments have used it now.
May-22-12  LIFE Master AJ:
May-22-12  apple scruffs: <parmetd> my favorites were Nakamura-Robson and Lenderman-Kamsky.
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: When do they announce “Best Game” prizes?
May-22-12  paavoh: <But throughout history, revolutionary ideas have always met resistance from the 'purists'>

Ditto for stupid ideas ;-)

May-22-12  Riverbeast: <By now, enough tournaments have been played with the alternative system for a comparable statistical record to exist, right?>

I think the 3-1 scoring system is still relatively new

I first saw it used in the London Chess Classic several years ago

But it does seem to lead to a lot of decisive games

More importantly, it makes players play out positions as long as there's any play left...I think it works better than Sofia rules, because the entire risk/reward calculation is drastically altered

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC