26...Rf8? lost a piece. Spassky vs Fischer, 1960  (C39) King's Gambit Accepted, 29 moves, 1-0 27... Bxh2? loses a piece for two pawns. Spassky vs Fischer, 1972  (E56) Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line with 7...Nc6, 56 moves, 1-0 27. Qc2? allows an annihilating deflection stroke. Spassky vs Fischer, 1972  (E41) Nimzo-Indian, 27 moves, 0-1 19...Nd7? blunders away pawn, pawn position, and game Fischer vs Spassky, 1972  (A39) English, Symmetrical, Main line with d4, 37 moves, 1-0 69. Rd1+? (Rc3+!) drives the Black king to support f-pawn. Spassky vs Fischer, 1972  (B04) Alekhine's Defense, Modern, 74 moves, 0-1 21. Bb5? and 27...f6? lose pawns for each player -> draw Fischer vs Spassky, 1972  (D37) Queen's Gambit Declined, 40 moves, 1/2-1/2 17...Kc6? loses a pawn or two Fischer vs Spassky, 1992  (C69) Ruy Lopez, Exchange, Gligoric Variation, 21 moves, 1-0 26...Qf6? leaves the knight file defenseless Fischer vs Spassky, 1992  (B45) Sicilian, Taimanov, 35 moves, 1-0 19. Nf5? sacrifices a knight for no compensation Spassky vs Fischer, 1992  (E83) King's Indian, Samisch, 27 moves, 0-1 9 games