chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer
"Fischer King" (game of the day Nov-01-2008)
Spassky - Fischer World Championship Match (1972), Reykjavik ISL, rd 13, Aug-10
Alekhine Defense: Modern. Alburt Variation (B04)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 40 times; par: 119 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Spassky/Fischer games
sac: 49...Kxd7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 20 OF 20 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Give Robert Fischer a STOCKFISH .. a Robert Fischer circa 1967 ... and HE WOULD LITERALLY BLOW YOU AWAY.
Jun-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Regrettably, the possibility cannot be excluded; we have seen instances of computer assistance going back to 1993, the Stone Age, if not earlier, involving even some very strong players--stronger than your humble correspondent ever was.

Details of the 1993 contretemps may be found here: Von Neumann. I was present for part of the event but only heard of it on my next visit to Philadelphia, some weeks later.

Jun-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < James51358: Beatgiant, perfidious, so today's GM's would use computers to analyze adjourned positions? That's sad indeed. Have we lost the ability to think for ourselves?>

Of course not. But since the computers are now stronger than human grandmasters, present and past, rules of competition have to be changed to deal with that ineluctable fact.

Jun-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: The truly unfortunate part is that some players, in chess and worse still, in life, cannot or will not think for themselves. As <keypusher> notes, no getting away from it.
Jun-26-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <James51358>
<Beatgiant, perfidious, so today's GM's would use computers to analyze adjourned positions?>

How could we implement a rule against using computers for adjournment analysis? During the rest period, would we place the players in some kind of isolation ward under constant surveillance until the game resumption?

And without an effective rule against it, any player would be crazy not to use computers. It would be conceding a huge advantage to the other player.

Jun-27-19  James51358: beatgiant, it's not about rule and regulations. This simple man believes in our own ability to think for ourselves. We humans don't need a computer's aide. I, personally, am just an average player. I choose to play to my own abilities, with no outside help. The real excitement in this game is our abilities to think for ourselves. We don't need computer assistance. your thoughts!
Jun-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <James51358>
It's easy for us as amateurs to forswear computers, but the cold, hard fact is that computers are a game-changer for professional play. No top player today can afford to do without them.
Jul-01-19  James51358: beatgiant, that is plain sad. I play on chess.com. Win or lose, I love this brain game. My record 147 wins, 185 losses, and 10 draws. I've never nor will I ever use a computer to assist me in any of my games. Again, its saddens me that the pros need to do so.
Jul-01-19  James51358: Anyways, back to this great game between 2 awesome players that didn't have nor needed a computer. Will someone, please, explain how 69 Rd1+ and 69 Rc3+ are really any different. Doesn't Fischer win either way?
Jul-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <James51358>
On 69. Rc3+, if Black tries to advance the king with 69...Ke2, White can liquidate the pawns with 70. Rxc4 f3 71. Re4+ Kf1 72. Ra4 f2 73. Bc5. How do you think Fischer could win?
Jul-31-19  James51358: 69. Rd1+. i wonder how many such blunders that I've made in my own games? lol. And, what about other world champions? The blunders they made.
Jul-31-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Boris is God.

Bobby is more than a God.

Discuss. ( WITHOUT STOCK FISH pleeeeze )

Aug-01-19  James51358: Could Spassky's 14 Bxa4 be a mistake? Due to being down on material and losing his white squared bishop that was aiming at Fischer's king? I offer that 14 Bc4 may be a better choice. your thoughts?
Aug-01-19  utssb: 14.Bc4 shouldn't work because of
14...Ne4 15.Qe4 Nc5 16.Qd5 Ne6 with ...c6 and b5 coming ex. 17.Ra5 c6 18.Ra8 cd5 19.Bd5 Nc7 14...Ne4 15.Qe4 Nc5 16.Qe3 Ne6 safe with the pawn up for Black 14...Ne4 15.Bb5 Bd7 16.Ba4 Ba4 17.Qe4 Bc6 pawn, bishop pair and tempo for Black 16.Qe4 Bb5 17.Qb7 c6 (or anything really)
14...Ne4 15.Bb5 Bd7 16.Bd7 Qd7 17.Qe4 Nc5 or b5
Aug-01-19  utssb: or 14...Ne4 15.Bb5 Nac3 rather
Aug-03-19  James51358: This awesome game between 2 great players is so much fun to analyze!!! It's like, how did this game happen? No computers, just 2 intelligence human brains at work!! INCREDIBLE!!! This game took over 9 Hours to play.Not to mention the over night analyzing!! WOW!!!
Sep-08-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: 'I found ways that Spassky could get a winning position in the opening of the Alekhine Defence. Fischer played the Alekhine Defence and Spassky missed a very big advantage.'

https://www.stabroeknews.com/2015/f...

Sep-13-19  James51358: N.O.F.. I'm sure post game analyze prove that both players missed some good moves. I believe 1....Nf6 hit Spassky like a cold shower. He was not prepared for it at all and lost this beautiful, yet brutal, game to Fischer. Giving Fischer a strong 3 point lead with just 11 games left. Any thoughts?
Oct-23-19  The Boomerang: harrylime: <perfidious: That formidable analytical team which assisted Botvinnik in his efforts to hold the draw against Fischer would have had nothing on today's Stockfish et al.> Give Fischer Stockfish . The Fischer of 1970. Just like Magnus the draw King has .. That would be interesting. 😎😚"

Carlsen scored better against Anand in 2013, than Fischer did against Spassky in 1972.

With regards to engines it's all relative, if Fischer had an engine his opponents would too, actually for the first time his opponents would have a reference point stronger than Fischer, so that should narrow the gap between Fischer and his opponents, would it not?

Oct-23-19  Carrots and Pizza: Is this not one of the most hard fought, uncompromising WCC games of all time? I guess there are some mistakes in this game and some people think that takes away from its glory, but I don't care. This is real chess!
Oct-23-19  ewan14: Fischer playing the Alekhine Defence should not have been a surprise
Nov-08-19  James51358: This game took over 9 hours(over 2 days) to play. Not to mention many hours of overnight analysis after adjournment. We can't even imagine that in today's speed chess world. Kinda sad!!
Nov-08-19  RookFile: It's a pity that neither Spassky nor Fischer wrote a book about this match. There must be a lot of unrevealed secrets.
Nov-08-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: < RookFile: It's a pity that neither Spassky nor Fischer wrote a book about this match. There must be a lot of unrevealed secrets.>

Spassky is still alive, so there's still a chance.

Spassky might not be inclined to write a book though. Perhaps he can get a co-author.

Nov-14-19  James51358: Rookfile, this very game has it's unrevealed secrets. 2 great players in this one incredible game. Fought tooth and nail til the end. how amazing!!!!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 20)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 20 OF 20 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
55. ...Kb5
from Endgames for Pure Pleasure by Patca63
marassek's favorite games
by marassek
Lengthy and Complex
by Whitehat1963
9.a4
from Famous and infamous a-pawn moves by Milo
26th World Championship Match, Game 13
from Highlights from World Championship Matches by Bubo bubo
Alekhine Defense: Modern. Alburt Variation (B04) 0-1 Ballsy
from EG Rookie Plus Endgames Rock Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 98: Bobby Fischer Rediscovered by Andy Soltis
from yPublished Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source by fredthebear
November 1: Fischer King
from Game of the Day 2008 by Phony Benoni
Ravelin's favorite games
by Ravelin
Fisher King
from Openings by tivrfoa
French, Caro, Pirc, Alekhine, et al.
by mmzkr
THE GAME THAT NEED TONS OF ANALYSIS !!!
by indoknight
13th Match Game
from Fischer 101 by rea
Mil y Una Partidas 1960-1974
by K9Empress
Game 34
from How to Reassess Your Chess 4th ed by Silman by skybluesky
dvilet's favorite games
by dvilet
Bobby Fischer's Path To World Champion
by LionHeart40
#13 Spassky has great recovery,then blunders
from fischer-spassky by kevin86
Game 487
from number 5 by Frodo7


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC