chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Frank Marshall vs Amos Burn
"The Pipe Game" (game of the day Jun-09-2013)
Paris (1900), Paris FRA, rd 14, Jun-12
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation. Normal Line (D55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 101 times; par: 27 [what's this?]

Annotations by Frank Marshall.      [9 more games annotated by Marshall]

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Marshall/Burn games
sac: 14.Bxg6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-21-05  molle2006: Isn't there another pipe game, in which the smoker finally drops the pipe out of his mouth because of a striking queen or rook sac?
Aug-22-05  who: Someone claimed that that happened in reference to S Levitsky vs Marshall, 1912
Oct-06-05  schnarre: I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Jun-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Marshall was the youngest (22) participant of Paris 1900, Burn was the second oldest (51), after Mr. Mortimer. But despite of being skunked by the young upstart Marshall, who could have easily been his son, Burn did quite well in the tournament: 1. Lasker +13, 2. Pilsbury +9, 3-4. Maroczy-Marshall +8, 5. Burn +6, 6. Chigorin +5, 7-8. Schechter-Miesses-Marco, 9-10. Janowsky-Schowalter,...
Jun-15-06  RookFile: Sonas looked at gomes like this and concluded that Burn should be rated 2728 for 1900, better than Paul Morphy at 2651 in 1858.
Jun-15-06  Ziggurat: <Sonas looked at gomes like this and concluded that Burn should be rated 2728 for 1900, better than Paul Morphy at 2651 in 1858.>He did not "look at any games". He looked at results of games. OK?
Oct-11-06  Plato: Amos Burn is largely forgotten nowadays, and it is a pity that he seems best remembered for being the unfortunate loser of this game who didn't get to light his pipe.

In fact, Burn was one of the best players in the world for many years, with lifetime plus scores against top players like Steinitz (+1 =3 -0), Gunsberg (+4 -3 =5), Pillsbury (+2 -1 =2), Charousek (+1 =1 -0) Bernstein (+3 -1 =0), Alekhine (+1 -0 =0), etc., and equal records against the likes of Zukertort, Chigorin, Maroczy, Spielmann, Nimzowitsch, etc.

As to <Dirk Diggler>'s comment, <blackBURN would not have been beaten here>, I can't help but point out that Burn's record against Blackburne was also in his favor: +6 -4 =6.

May-26-07  Knight13: Funny.
Oct-04-07  mircea88: Aside from the later tactical blunders, Black has started with no less than 4 strategic errors in his "avant-la-lettre" Tartakover:

1] Missed the all-important ...h6, which goes a long way against White's K-side attack. With this move, Black removes the target-Pawn from h7 with tempo gained on the White Bishop which normally retreats to h4.

2] Missed gaining a tempo on White's other Bishop with 7.Bd3 dxc4 8.Bxc4.

3] Missed the opportunity to exchange pieces with Nxd5. Black normally tries to un-cramp his position through exchanges in QGD.

4] Placed his QB passively on b7, since the long diagonal is shut down by P/d5. Normally that Bishop comes out on e6 instead, where it has some activity.

Of course, these principles were only established two decades later, when Tartakover developed this defence.

Oct-04-07  mircea88: Even so, Teschner vs Spassky, 1959 (mentioned previously), proves that it's not too late for the liberating 10...c5, the classical equalizing move in QGD. With exact play, Spassky refutes Marshall's "Pillsbury attack" and then his central break ultimately wins the game. But I'd try it as White in club games anyway :)

BTW, I thought that Ne5; f4 is the Pillsbury attack - can someone clarify this?

Feb-06-08  hesyrett: I saw this game published in "Chess Review" long ago under the heading "Burn Fiddles While Marshall Roams."  I hereby pass this pun on to the next generation of chess buffs.
Jul-13-08  mty1637: Es muy buena la partida por parte de Marshall aunque pobre defensa hecha por Burn... En la partida Teschner vs Spassky, 1959 se muestra la defensa correcta
Oct-22-08  Mulyahnto: Move 8: "I 'speeded' up my moves" ... Hilarious
Dec-23-08  WhiteRook48: So I sacrificed myself on Rh8? In order to do Qh7#? I don't remember sacrificing myself in this game. (my username)
Jan-24-09  WhiteRook48: so Burn didn't get his pipe Burning
Feb-01-09  WhiteRook48: nice Bishop and Rook sac
Oct-11-09  hedgeh0g: <So I sacrificed myself on Rh8? In order to do Qh7#? I don't remember sacrificing myself in this game. (my username)>

Could you please explain the joke a little more? There was still a gasp of humour left in it after the parenthetic explanation.

Mar-03-10  60tat: nice game and memorably wry,droll commentary
Jul-15-10  Poulsen: Marshall would be invaluable as a chess promoting ambassador to day - not many top-players are THAT colorfull, both in-game and "out-game".
Sep-22-10  sevenseaman: 17. Rh8+; Que voulez vous, entrez mon parlor!
Dec-22-11  Birthday Boy: Enjoyed his annotations =) hehe
Dec-29-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Oh wow. Not much analysis in this game, more of what Burn was doing.
Jan-21-12  AnalyzeThis: This game is another example of my theory that how black handles his queens's bishop often determines his fate. It looks very pretty on b7, but does nothing, in this game. It would have been far better for Burn to have kept it on c8 as long as needed, then found a way to have exchanged it for one of white's pieces.
Apr-21-12  wordfunph: notes by Marshall from Sam Collins' Gambit Busters..

<after 2.c4>

"Britisher Amos Burn was a very conservative player and liked to settle down for a long session of close, defensive chess. He loved to smoke his pipe while he studied the board. As I made my second move, Burn began hunting through his pockets for his pipe and tobacco."

<after 4.Be7>

"Not much thought needed on these moves, but Burn had his pipe out and was looking for a pipe cleaner."

<after 8...exd5>

"He began filling up his pipe. I speeded up my moves."

<after 10.h4>

"Made him think on that one - and he still didn't have the pipe going."

<after 14...fxg6>

"He struck a match, appeared nervous. The match burned his fingers and went out."

<after 15...Nd7>

"Another match was by now on its way."

<after 16...Qf6>

"He was puffing away and lighting up at last. No time left."

<after 17.Rh8+>

"Poor Burn. I think I swindled him out of that one. If he could only have got that pipe going, it might have been a different story. He took it goodnaturedly and we shook hands. Then his pipe went out."

:-)

May-14-12  Llawdogg: Hilarious annotations by Frank Marshall.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC