chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Paul Keres vs Alexander Alekhine
"Keresene" (game of the day Sep-10-2013)
Margate (1937), Margate ENG, rd 7, Apr-07
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Modern Steinitz Defense (C71)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 101 times; par: 29 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Keres/Alekhine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-01-11  drnooo: also you will notice that in their first eight encounters Alekhine was only one game ahead, for all practical purposes they played even. After that, after the Heil Hitlers began was where the chasm comes. But I am sure that this is just a coincidence.
Aug-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: It seems as if Alekhine (Alekhine!) was already in serious trouble after 10.Bc5. Amazing what Keres could do against even the best.
Aug-01-11  ChitownChesster: Wow, what a pretty combination! I don't know much about chess history, but what drnooo is alluding to sounds pretty accurate in terms of the "spirit of the times." It was a very turbulent period in history and Keres was probably in an entirely different situation than Alekhine.
Aug-01-11  Gregor Samsa Mendel: Although Alekhine's game looks bad from early on, it seems that <mulde> is correct in saying that if Alekhine had found 20...Bh3, the game would have been equal, at least in my quick patzerish assessment.
Aug-01-11  sevenseaman: I want to acquire a book on my favorite area 'The Art of Sacrifice' - Spielmann or Shamkovich?

Which one or both?

Aug-01-11  sfm: I wonder what Keres had planned on 20.-,Bh3, the most obvious move in the position. Since Alekhine didn't play it, and Keres allowed it, there must be something, or at least something that looked like something. Anyone with a silicon brain?
Aug-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <sevenseaman: I want to acquire a book on my favorite area 'The Art of Sacrifice' - Spielmann or Shamkovich? Which one or both?>

Vladimir Vukovic's book would also be well worth your time.

<chancho: ....but then again we all have a tendency to lie on occassion.>

As a poker player, guess I know where I fit in!

<drnooo> Whilst Keres has never been one of my favourite players, he rates at the top with me when it comes to character.

One question I ask those who would judge Keres or Alekhine for all that might have gone when they were in the Occupied Territories: who knows what they themselves might have done, faced with such draconian conditions in everyday living?

There's plenty of evidence that Alekhine was far from the most moral person, quite apart from any question as to the degree to which he was complicit in the Pariser Zeitung pieces which appeared under his byline.

Keres? Never seen or heard a bad word about him as a man or grandmaster. The worst thing I ever saw appear under his name regarded his views on the young Fischer, stating that he believed the future champion lacked objectivity regarding his opponents, as well as his own play.

Aug-01-11  sfm: Maybe 20.-,Bh3 21.Nd4, e.g. -,Lxg2 22.Re1. Complicated. -,c5 is stupid, as White is clearly better after 23.Ne5, but how about -,Kb8
Aug-01-11  Artsemthon: 23.Qxd7+ and now 23...Rxd7 24.Re8+ Rd8 25.Rxd8# (either rook), or 23...Kb8 24.Qxd8+ Ka7 25.Qxf6 and White has won two rooks and a bishop.
Aug-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: He should have been world champion.
Aug-01-11  Once: It's our old friend - the weak back rank. How many times have we seen rapid mating combinations as a result of a king being trapped by his own pawns?
Aug-01-11  morfishine: <23.Qxd7+> Oops, No more drinks for you Doctor...
Aug-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: back rank defeat, no longer a stigma. I now feel honoured to be in such company
Aug-01-11  sevenseaman: I used to call it 'Maths from Moscow' on a/c of the calculation involved but now I call it 'The Polka Dance' because it demands a lot of toughness and stamina, else it can tire one out.

Misratdin Mehdi Oglu Iskandarov-Karen H, Grigoryan, Moscow, 2011.


click for larger view

w in 10, max against best defense.

Aug-01-11  sevenseaman: <scormus> <back rank defeat, no longer a stigma. I now feel honoured to be in such company>

Stigma it may not be. But what a patzer move is 22...Qb4? If a person like me happened to make it you'll hound me in my dreams too. Alekhine...he must have bee snoring in his chair.

Aug-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Blacks had little answer to queen takes bishop,

Steinitz might have had severe reprimand pure kedgeree it distinguising level defence for Mr Keres well played on Maestro

<sevenseasman> trace PK similar route obvious great nh6

Aug-01-11  agb2002: White has a knight and a pawn for a bishop.

Black would probably consider 23... Rd6.

The black castle is poorly defended, in particular, the back rank and the pinned bishop. This suggests 23.Qxd7+:

A) 23... Rxd7 24.Re8+ and mate next.

B) 23... Kb8 24.Qxd8+ Ka7 25.Qxf6, quite a massacre.

Aug-01-11  zb2cr: Amazing that Alekhine overlooked this. 23. Qxd7+ wins as many have pointed out.

And to <drnoo>: Check the date. War had not yet broken out in 1937. The stress you imagine either player to be under was not perhaps as great as you were thinking.

Aug-01-11  Patriot: 23.Qxd7+ Rxd7 24.Re8+ Rd8 25.Rxd8# was easy to calculate. Or 23.Qxd7+ Kb8 24.Qxd8+ Ka7 25.Qxf6 Qxc4+ 26.Kb1.

Even the best player's in the world blunder sometimes. Usually they make subtle mistakes but isn't this part of the excitement of watching human players compete? Does anyone get a thrill out of watching computers play against each other? Not me. Just wondering...

Aug-01-11  Ferro: Calculs terrorifics for Alekhine
Aug-01-11  Ferro: "Terrifying calculations for Alekhine"
Aug-01-11  bvwp: Have always respected Max Euwe's response to invasion by Nazis. He went on teaching; he would not play in their chess tournaments.
Aug-01-11  sevenseaman: <Have always respected Max Euwe's response to invasion by Nazis. He went on teaching; he would not play in their chess tournaments.>

Isn't it tragic that an intellectual pursuit like chess has had to deal with the politics of its time.

One could say, so have had the pure sciences like chemistry and physics; but then Chess is just a game, a matter of mere brownie points!

Aug-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: 23.QxB/d7+!
Aug-01-11  kevin86: The queen sac results in a quickmate. It was time for Alekhine to resign and for the bar to close.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC