chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Max Euwe vs Rudolf Loman
"Low Man on the Totem Pole" (game of the day Sep-19-2017)
SSS Cup 7th Vierkamp (1923), Rotterdam NED, Jan-??
Reti Opening: Advance Variation (A09)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)better is 5.d3 = -0.01 (24 ply) ⩱ -0.57 (23 ply) after 5...Nh6 6.Nc2 e5 7.d3 O-O 8.g3 b6 9.Bg2 Bb7 10.O-O better is 6...Ne7 7.e3 O-O 8.d3 c5 9.Be2 Nd7 10.O-O b6 11.Nd2 ⩱ -0.70 (22 ply)= -0.09 (22 ply) after 7.d3 Ne7 8.g3 c5 9.Bg2 cxb4 10.Nxb4 O-O 11.O-O Nd7 better is 9.Be2 O-O 10.d3 a5 11.a3 c5 12.Rb1 Nec6 13.O-O axb4 = 0.00 (23 ply) ⩱ -0.60 (24 ply)better is 10...O-O 11.Bd3 Nbc6 12.O-O Ne5 13.Qe2 Re8 14.Rae1 Qd7 ⩱ -0.60 (24 ply)= 0.00 (21 ply) after 11.Bd3 O-O 12.O-O Nd7 13.Qf4 c5 14.Rae1 Nc6 15.Be4 Be5 better is 12...c5 13.hxg6 fxg6 14.Qh3 h6 15.Bd3 Nd7 16.O-O cxb4 = +0.05 (19 ply) ⩲ +0.62 (20 ply) 15...Kf8 16.b5 c5 17.Bd3 Nd7 18.f4 Nc8 19.Ne1 Qc7 20.Nf3 ⩲ +0.59 (22 ply) ± +2.36 (27 ply) after 16.Qh7+ Kf8 17.Nxd4 Qxd4 18.Bxd4 Bxd4 19.c5 Bg7 20.Bc4 16...Kf8 17.Qh7 Qxd4 18.Bxd4 Bxd4 19.c5 Bg7 20.Bc4 Nd7 ± +2.44 (23 ply)+- mate-in-21-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 79 times; par: 27 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Euwe/R Loman games
sac: 17.Qh8+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-18-10  jackpawn: Found immediately. I love x-rays.
Oct-18-10  kevins55555: 17. Qh8+!! Bxh8 18. Rxh8# mate! It's a sacrifice! 6 points losing in exchange but checkmate!
Oct-18-10  riverunner: boy it's windy in here.
Oct-18-10  turbo231: <gars: I love Mondays! I love only Mondays! I hate all the other days...>

I know what you're talking about. I used to try hard every day. Now I only look at mon, tues, and wed, sometimes thur's puzzles. The other days give me a headache. I'm thinking about only doing monday and tuesday's puzzles because the more puzzles I do the worse I get.

Oct-18-10  TheaN: ?!

For some odd reason I saw a pawn at h2 for 5 minutes I was looking at this game, before giving up seeing Qh8† leads to nothing then. Guess it's late, now almost 2AM here. Ofc, OTB Qh8† is an instant spot and was my first candidate here.

Oct-18-10  redorc19: Isn't this an X-RAY tactic????
Oct-18-10  EXIDE: 16. ..,Bxd4 was a mistake. Did black really think white had made an error on the knight capture of pawn the previous move? OK for Monday.
Oct-18-10  lionel15: I thought it was rather neat. But then I like chess I can understand
Jun-06-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Death of a Salesman (someone else submitted this pun before I did, alas).
Sep-14-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Miller's Crossing.

Renaud and Kahn classify this as Mate No. 9B.

I'm not convinced that classifying mates like this is a useful exercise - on one hand, the naming of basic types can help players to remember patterns and see opportunities, but on the other hand, there will always be exceptions. And an over-formal concept of mating patterns may lead to chances being overlooked.

Still. 16.Nxd4 is a pretty blow.

Sep-19-17  Arconax: <offramp: Time-waster on Friendly Shaft, THAT would be funny.>

What about "Death of a Low Man"? That would point to Black's surname who after all lost the game, hence "death to..", but more importantly, it would also point to Arthur Miller's play "Death of a Salesman" where the protagonist is a man named Loman (Willy Loman). Now, THAT would be both intelligent AND funny.

Sep-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Arconax>, I am sorry, but I deleted my comment for being politically incorrect.
Sep-19-17  Arconax: Even your avatar looks politically incorrect to me, <offramp>.
Sep-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ferrabraz: If 16... Ra2 17. Qh7 Kf8 18. Qg7! Kg7 19. Ne6 and Rh8#
Sep-19-17  Cheapo by the Dozen: The Reti Opening prior to 1924? Interesting!
Sep-19-17  Retireborn: <Cheapo> There's even an example with 3.b4 played in 1909 (by an FG Richter) in my database.

Perhaps the first Reti with a double fianchetto is this game:-

Reti vs G Fontein, 1923

Sep-19-17  waustad: Some day a pun with "noodles" will come up with black as the victim.
Sep-20-17  kevin86: Quaint mate in the corner!
Sep-20-17  kevin86: Yo Loman: NO SALE!
Sep-20-17  kevin86: Pun: Death of a salesman!
Jun-17-18  CheckMateEndsTheGame: I think this is in Yakov neishtadt book as well
Jun-06-19  sneaky pete: The duplicate Euwe vs Loman, 1924 has a wrong year but (probably) the right moves (resignation at move 17).

The tags Rotterdam (for event and site) is almost certainly wrong. Hans Kmoch, Euwe slaagt, 1937 (a game collection with biographical notes) states that thie game (17 moves) was played October 4 and refers to the event as <Bekerwedstrijd S.S.S.>. The first part means: Cup Tournament and the S.S.S. stands for Scheveningsche Sschaak-Sociëteit (Scheveningen Chess Socuiety). So I believe this game was not played in Rotterdam, but in Scheveningen (or Scheveningen NED, as the scientists say).

Euwe won a double round robin quadrangular in Scheveningen, 1923, with 6 points from 6 games. This database has 2 wins each (one as white, one as black) with Fontein and Rueb and one win as black with Loman. All these games are tagged SSS Cup and Scheveningen NED. I humbly propose that this is the missing sixth game, with 17 or 18 moves, I don't care.

Mar-04-20  OrangeTulip: Is b4 an invention by Euwe?
In which case it could be named the Reti Euwe variation
Jul-07-23  generror: Poor Loman really looks like a patzer here, but he seems to have been quite strong, even beating both E. Laskers:

Lasker vs R Loman, 1903

R Loman vs Ed. Lasker, 1912

Aug-07-24  generror: And man, that's why I don't like fianchettoing my bishop on the kingside. It's just so easy to attack with h4-h5, and as we see here, together with the enemy bishop fianchettoed on the queenside (which I do like), you can get into biiig trouble really quick. Of course Black could have defended better, but still, a nice quick and painless win that I think makes a good model game. Classic "sac, sac, mate", too.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC