< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 9 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
May-21-06 | | Malawi Nick: Now I see that, a coupla years ago, <Patzer2> posted a better answer to your question. |
|
Jun-16-06 | | GeauxCool: Steinitz stubbornly persisted with this variation, even after losing the championship to Lasker with the same 7 opening moves (lasker played 7...Nxe4). Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 Game 1 Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 Game 2 Annotate...
Black is all tied up after 13...Nxe7. (13...Kxe7 Re1+ 14.Kf8 was preferred) 16...c6?? allows the combination. 22.Rxe7+! every White piece is en prise. 24.Rxg7+, the rook cannot be taken.(Fine has the ending as 24...Kh8 25.Rxh7+) At the resignation, Steinitz demonstrated to onlookers the conclusive mate in 10. - Fine |
|
Sep-29-06 | | jamesmaskell: Impressive play by Steinitz. |
|
Mar-05-07 | | sanyas: 17.d5 is the most beautiful pawn sacrifice I have ever seen. |
|
Sep-27-07
 | | chancho: Who says Steinitz was weak in open games? This is one awesome game. |
|
Dec-08-07 | | addiction to chess: Why didn't black eat the rook on move 22.
Wasn't it free? |
|
Dec-08-07 | | nescio: <addiction to chess: Why didn't black eat the rook on move 22.
Wasn't it free?>
<Aug-06-04
patzer2: White's 21. Ng5+! is a strong discovered check, followed by an amazing 22. Rxe7+! deflection move.If 22...Qxe7, then 23. Rxc8+ Rxc8 24. Qxc8+ Qd8 25. Qxd8+ Kxd8 26. Nxh7 Ke7 27. f4 Kf7 28. Kf2 Kg7 29. Nxf6 Kxf6 30. g4 is a won endgame for White. If 22...Kxe7, then 23. Re1+ Kd6 24. Qb4+ Rc5 (24...Kc7 25. Ne6+ Kb8 26. Qf4+ Rc7 27. Nxc7 b6 28. Nxa8 Kxa8 29. Qxf6 ; 24...Kc6 25. Rc1#) 25. Qf4+ Kc6 26. Re6+ Kb5 27. a4+ Ka5 28. b4+ Kxa4 29. bxc5+ Kb5 30. Qxf6 is winning for White.> |
|
Feb-23-08 | | D.Observer: <addiction to chess: Why didn't black <eat the rook> on move 22.> The word 'capture' is enough. |
|
May-19-08 | | MichAdams: In OMGP I, Kasparov/Plisetsky point out that in 1983 Geller (improving on analysis by I. Zaitsev) found a win for White after 15.Qa4+ Kf7 16.Ne5+!! (his mainline running 16...fxe5 17.Rxe5 Qd6 18.Qc4+ Kf8 19.Rae1 Ng8 20.Rd5 Qc6 21.Qb4 Kf7 22.Rc5 Qd6 23.Qc4+ Kf8 24.Rxc7 ). According to Estrin in 64 no.23 for 1986, Geller made this discovery in the sleeping car of a train travelling between Moscow and Murmansk. All of which means that Steinitz's 15.Qe2 properly merits a ?, and Black's decisive error must be located prior to 16...c6?. |
|
Jul-07-08 | | Marmot PFL: <MichAdams> After 16.Qa4+ Qd7 it's not immediately clear how white's attack is any stronger than in the game. 17.Qb4 Kf7 18.Qxb7 Rab8 19.Qxa7 Rxb2 20.a4 and Steinitz most likely would win, but as Fischer said they don't give brilliancy prizes for endgame technique. |
|
Jul-20-08 | | derek.mourad: why is this game so special? steinitz game steinitz vs tchigorin, 1892 spanish game is alot better |
|
Aug-05-08 | | myschkin: . . .
"Liegt deine Partie aber ganz darnieder / Dann geh mal raus und komm nicht wieder!" Der Berliner Meister war ein hochsensibler, auf seine Umgebung allerdings oft skurril wirkender Mensch. Als er beim Schachkongress nach vorzüglichem Start und wohlberechtigten Hoffnungen auf ein gutes Abschneiden gegen <Steinitz> in einen Mattangriff geriet, gab er die Partie nicht etwa auf, sondern verschwand einfach aus dem Turniersaal und ließ sich nicht mehr blicken! Diese Form der Kapitulation praktizierte er später häufig, sodass man ein damals geflügeltes Wort mit seinem Namen verknüpfte! (source Oma ... )
|
|
Aug-10-08 | | eisenherz: Tja, das praktizieren die Leute heute auch, vor allem in Yahoo Chess. lol |
|
Nov-15-08
 | | BishopBerkeley: There is a little-known commentary on this game by Charles Sanders Peirce, the great American philosopher and polymath who founded Pragmatism (and created the word "pragmatic" that we use so freely today). For more on this, please see Sarah Beth's <SBC>'s post here (to which I have contributed, as well), "The Pride and Sorrow of American Philosophy": http://blog.chess.com/batgirl/the-p... The particular article in which the modest commentary occurs is Professor Richard S. Robin's "Metaphysical Reflections on Peirce on Chess" presented here: http://www.100bestwebsites.org/alt/... (Professor Robin had conferred with former U.S. Chess Champion Patrick Wolff in writing this paper.) Relative to America in the 19th century (though perhaps not in the 18th century), I am inclined to agree with Professor Max H. Fisch's estimate of C. S. Peirce's intellectual achievements: "Who is the most original and the most versatile intellect that the Americas have so far produced? The answer 'Charles S. Peirce' is uncontested, because any second would be so far behind as not to be worth nominating. [He was] mathematician, astronomer, chemist, geodesist, surveyor, cartographer, metrologist, spectroscopist, engineer, inventor; psychologist, philologist, lexicographer, historian of science, mathematical economist, lifelong student of medicine; book reviewer, dramatist, actor, short story writer; phenomenologist, semiotician, logician, rhetorician and metaphysician." -Max H. Fisch in Sebeok, The Play of Musement http://www.peirce.org/
Best wishes to all!
(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)
|
|
Nov-15-08 | | Shams: <BishopBerkeley> C.S. Peirce was indeed an outstanding philosopher, but I had no idea whatsoever he was also a chess aficionado. Thanks for the update. Have you read Louis Menand's "The Metaphysical Club"? Superb book on Peirce, Holmes, William James and others. |
|
Nov-15-08
 | | BishopBerkeley: An excellent recommendation, <Shams>! I have indeed read "The Metaphysical Club." It is wonderfully engaging: a magnificent piece of historical biography. I might also recommend "William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism," by Robert D. Richardson. Another excellent book. Indeed, very few people know about the connection between C.S. Peirce and Chess! I only discovered the connection when the book that contains Professor Robin's article was lent to me by his (Professor Robin's) son. I think the connection is almost wholly unknown to the world of Chess history. By the way, here are a few links on the philosophy of C.S. Peirce, for those who might be interested: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/p...
http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/PeirceBi.htm
http://www.nyu.edu/pages/linguistic... http://www.cspeirce.com/
And here's the general Wikipedia article, for those who might like to learn a little more about this remarkable thinker: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charle...
Incidentally, Peirce's father, Harvard Professor Benjamin Peirce, was present at the famous New York Chess Club Testimonial Banquet for Paul Morphy given upon his triumphal return from Europe on May 25, 1859. Sarah Beth <SBC> has an excellent account of this event: http://sbchess.sinfree.net/note13a....
Thanks again! I second your recommendation of "The Metaphysical Club" with enthusiasm! (: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)
|
|
Nov-16-08 | | brankat: <Bishop Berkely> Thank You very much for the info and links relating to Mr.C.S.Pierce. A most fascinating person. I suppose I now have my list of "books to read" cut out for me for quite some time :-) On another matter. About a month ago You posted on P.Morphy's page in regards to the Presidential elections and provided links to "ElectoralMaps". Great work, and a most useful site. Thank You again. Today a CG member <ckr> left a most fascinating anecdote at Mprphy's for You. At least it was fascinating for me since I had not heard it before. It has to do with both, a US Pres.elections and Paul Morphy. Since You may not visit Morphy's site soon, and in case You are not familiar with the story in question, I'd hate to see You miss that post. So I'll take the liberty of re-postng it here: <ckr: <BB>A most excellent presentation but I would like to also add that after the 1852 election the Whig party failed and was never again a viable political party. The truth is that the Whig's once again were about to trounce the Democratic nominee. But those shady Dem's had leaked to the press that the Whig's war hero had been kicked in the back side not once but TWICE!! by a 9 year old in knickers (propped up by a stack of books) back in December of 1846. This highly public embarrassment effectively shattered their campaign which resulted in Pierce winning by a landslide.So while it is not often mentioned it was that 9 year old, Paul Morphy, that gave rise to the Republican party and modern politics.> |
|
Nov-16-08
 | | BishopBerkeley: <brankat> Thanks for the good words! I'm glad you enjoyed the information about C.S. Peirce as well as the www.ElectoralMaps.org webpage! I'll stop over at the Paul Morphy page and have a look.... Hope you are in good spirits....
(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)
|
|
Dec-12-08 | | Karpova: Edward Winter's feature article "Steinitz v von Bardeleben": http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... |
|
Dec-21-08 | | WhiteRook48: good game. Unusual Steinitz. |
|
Dec-24-08 | | WhiteRook48: surprising thing is the exchanges from move 11 to move 13. After 25. Rg7+, all white's pieces are attacked and will remain so for several moves. None, however, can be taken. |
|
Jan-01-09 | | WhiteRook48: it's listed as a 35 move game in game collections ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haha hahah ahah ahah aha haha ok this humor is not getting anywhere |
|
Jan-11-09 | | WhiteRook48: Steinitz had to play these checks- he was about to be mated himself! |
|
Jan-24-09 | | WhiteRook48: he'd just lost to Lasker |
|
Jan-24-09 | | Marmot PFL: <‘Bardeleben here retired and lost the game on the time limit. Subsequently he explained to his opponent that his action was meant as a protest against applauding a victor. ’> That's nothing. You should have heard Walter Browne's outburst to the crowd in Montreal after they applauded Leonid Shamkovich (for beating Browne). It had to be censored for the local papers. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 9 ·
Later Kibitzing> |