chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Gata Kamsky vs Boris Gelfand
"Gelfand the Flames" (game of the day Jun-12-2007)
World Championship Candidates (2007), Elista, Kalmykia Russia, Jun-11
Sicilian Defense: Canal Attack. Main Line (B52)  ·  0-1

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)better is 16.Nb5 dxc4 17.Nd6 Rd8 18.Nxb7 Qxd1 19.Raxd1 Rxd1 = 0.00 (30 ply) ⩱ -0.54 (25 ply)better is 17...Rxc5 18.b4 Rc4 19.Ne3 Rh4 20.Nxd5 Qd6 21.g3 Rc4 ⩱ -0.58 (25 ply)= 0.00 (29 ply) 20.Qxd5 Qxd5 21.Nxd5 Rc2 22.Rad1 Rd8 23.Rf2 Rc6 24.Rfd2 = 0.00 (30 ply)better is 20...Rf8 21.Rad1 d4 22.f4 Rad8 23.f5 g5 24.fxe6 Qxe6 ⩱ -0.92 (23 ply)better is 21.Ng4 Rf8 22.Qh6+ Kg8 23.Rfe1 Rc6 24.Rad1 Qd6 25.Qe3 d4 = -0.29 (21 ply) ⩱ -0.87 (22 ply) 23.Qh6+ Kg8 24.Rfe1 Rc6 25.Qh4 Kh8 26.Re4 h5 27.Nf2 Kg7 = -0.41 (20 ply) 23...h5 24.Nf2 Re8 25.Ne4 Rf5 26.b4 b6 27.Qf2 Re5 28.h4 ⩱ -1.29 (22 ply)better is 24.Qf2 Rf7 25.Qd2 Re7 26.h3 Re8 27.Re4 Qd6 28.Ree1 Rg5 = -0.49 (22 ply) ⩱ -1.02 (24 ply)better is 26.Qxd6 Rxd6 27.Rc2 Kf7 28.Nf2 Rd7 29.Nd3 Re8 30.Rec1 ⩱ -0.92 (26 ply) ⩱ -1.50 (23 ply)better is 28.Qg3 Nf4 29.Nd3 Nxd3 30.Qxd6 Rxd6 31.Rxd3 Kg6 32.a4 ⩱ -1.01 (21 ply) ∓ -1.64 (22 ply)better is 30...Rc8 31.Nd3 h4 32.Qe4 Qc6 33.Qf5 Nf4 34.g3 Qe6 ⩱ -1.50 (22 ply)better is 31.Re2 Re8 32.Nd3 Qc6 33.h4 gxh4 34.Qxh4 Qb5 35.Qe1 Qxd3 ⩱ -1.00 (22 ply) 31...Qc6 32.Qd1 Qd5 33.Nd3 Kf7 34.Rc2 Re8 35.Nb4 Qa5 ∓ -1.61 (22 ply) ⩱ -0.85 (23 ply) after 32.Re2 Rd7 33.b4 Na4 34.Re6 Qd5 35.Nd3 Nc3 36.Re8 Qxf3 33.Ne4 Nxe4 34.Qxe4 Rd7 35.Qd3 Qd5 36.Kf2 g4 37.Qe4 Qg5 ⩱ -0.79 (26 ply) ∓ -1.66 (24 ply) 34.Kf1 Rd7 35.Rd1 h4 36.a3 Re7 37.b4 Nd7 38.Ne4 Qe6 ⩱ -1.16 (21 ply) ∓ -2.25 (25 ply) 35.Re2 Qxb3 36.Re7+ Kf8 37.Qxb3 Nxb3 38.Re6 Kf7 39.Rxb6 ∓ -1.96 (24 ply)-+ -3.69 (24 ply) 39...Nxf3 40.b5 Ne1+ 41.Kg1 d2 42.Qb3 Qf5 43.Rxd2 Rxd2 -+ -7.83 (23 ply)-+ -3.53 (25 ply) 43.Qc7+ Rd7 44.Qf4 f5 45.h3 gxh3+ 46.Nxh3 Qd5+ 47.Kg1 -+ -2.84 (23 ply)-+ -5.08 (27 ply) after 43...Qe1+ 44.Kg2 Rd2 45.Qf5 Qe2 46.Kg1 Rd4 47.b5 Qe5 54.Qxf2 Qe4# -+ mate-in-10-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 47 more Kamsky/Gelfand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-12-07  percyblakeney: People had been posting for 30 moves that Kamsky was lost, so it began to feel as if Gelfand would blunder just to prove everyone wrong. But on the whole a very comfortable win for Gelfand. Marin points out that they followed the game below (not in this database) up until the 17th move.

[Event "North Urals Cup"]
[Site "Krasnoturinsk RUS"]
[Date "2005.07.12"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Kovalevskaya,E"]
[Black "Kosintseva,N"]
[WhiteElo "2471"]
[BlackElo "2490"]
[ECO "B52"]
[Result "0-1"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ Bd7 4. Bxd7+ Qxd7 5. c4 Nf6 6. Nc3 g6 7. O-O Bg7 8. d4 cxd4 9. Nxd4 O-O 10. f3 Rc8 11. b3 d5 12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Nxd5 e6 14. Bh6 exd5 15. Bxg7 Kxg7 16. c5 Na6 17. Qd2 Nxc5 18. Rad1 Kg8 19. Rf2 Re8 20. Nc2 Rad8 21. Ne3 d4 22. Ng4 Qe7 23. Rff1 f5 24. Nf2 Qf6 25. Qb4 b6 26. Rd2 Re3 27. Qc4+ Kg7 28. b4 Ne6 29. Nd1 Re5 30. Nb2 b5 31. Qc1 Nf4 32. Qc7+ Qe7 33. Qxe7+ Rxe7 34. Rfd1 Ne2+ 35. Kf1 Nc3 36. Rxd4 Nxd1 0-1

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

Jun-12-07  euripides: As <acirce> noted during the game, 11...d5 was played in 1999 by Har-Zvi and White's results have been poor against it:

Games Like Kamsky vs Gelfand, 2007

Jun-12-07  euripides: Kamsky's 'swallow-tail' pawn structure in the opening is like some of the things he has been doing with Black, more successfully: Bacrot vs Kamsky, 2007
Jun-12-07  Ezzy: <percyblakeney:>I don't understand why the game you posted (or any other important game in this line) doesn't appear in chessbase database or chessgames.com database. It was a big event, and the players were strong. Seems like bad database management to me.
Jun-12-07  Ezzy: <euripides: Kamsky's 'swallow-tail' pawn structure in the opening> Very interesting observation!

I usually call it the 'arrow head' formation, but I like 'swallow tail'

Jun-12-07  acirce: <tamar> Actually, it appears that 11..d5 was played by Har-Zvi against Rublevsky in 1993 - a game which is hard to find in any database. He (http://www.chessclub.com/finger/Ind...) told us during Kamsky-Gelfand that Ivanchuk had written to him on ICC, after his game against Delchev, to say that he had got the idea from Har-Zvi's 1993 game.

..d5 is of course extremely thematic, so if you are a player on this level you should either know about it or be able to see it yourself, preferably both. Kamsky did neither. It's easy equality here and almost a forced draw unless White goes crazy. White has to postpone castling: 7.d4 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bg7 9.f3 0-0 10.Be3 Rc8 11.b3 is the better version. Of course it's instructive to see what exactly it is that otherwise makes 11..d5 possible.

<euripides> I didn't say anything about a 1999 game. If you look closer you see that game ended after 11.b3 :-)

Jun-12-07  euripides: <acirce> thanks for the correction. There are a lot of short draws in this line - which of course bears out your observation that White's chances are limited.
Jun-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Great game by Gelfand! Will he be the next world champion?
Jun-12-07  Ashram64: <Richard Taylor: Great game by Gelfand! Will he be the next world champion?>

Gelfand's style is too solid. He will be a top player, but probably has a very slim chance to be a world champ.

Jun-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <acirce> Very interesting observations. I missed the game live, and tried to reconstruct using the Opening Explorer.

One of the attributes of the top guys is that they know everything, which is getting to be a burden these days.

I've been going over the Reshevsky-Fischer match, and see the same dynamic going on there. Reshevsky plays more at an even keel throughout the game, while Fischer is superior in the openings almost to an embarassing degree.

Jun-12-07  Ziggurat: <I usually call it the 'arrow head' formation, but I like 'swallow tail'>

I guess the "arrow head" seen in this game is more well known as a Maroczy bind.

Jun-12-07  Ziggurat: A Maroczy bind that failed since it did not prevent ...d5, I might add
Jun-12-07  dabearsrock1010: What's truly disappointing about Kamsky's performance is that he kept getting smashed out of the opening, which sort of implies he did not prepare properly for this event...its very disappointing our american hopeful couldnt at least play a few decent opening lines in these games vs. gelfand
Jun-12-07  kevin86: White's game sure went down fast. In the final position-despite even pawns-his position is hopeless.

Just kidding-mate comes next move.

BTW:note the pieces on f2,f3,f5,e3,and g3-doesn't it look like a cross (from black's point of view)? How symbolic! Especially with a "king" on the cross. The mate that follows is a diagonal form of the epaulette mate!

Jun-12-07  krish.adam: This is the price Kamsky has to pay for relinquishing chess when he was World# 3 and going for an academic exercise. While higher education is important, there is something called timing. He could have pursued it later after retirement. A talent such as this is God-given and doesn't happen for everybody. He should have respected that skill and continued to play professional chess. Why are the chess champions from the US (Bobby and Gata) are so screwed up?
Jun-12-07  Mendrys: I really don't think his taking a sabattical from chess to pursue a law degree makes him "screwed up". While there have been "issues" in the past, his temperment and personality do not compare with Bobby Fischer's ogreish behavior. As far as other US champions like:

Lev Alburt
Joel Benjamin
Arthur Bisguier
Nick De Firmian
Alexander Shabolov
Sammy Reshevsky
Larry Evans
Robert Byrne

I don't see where these guys can be considered screwed up either. Please don't generalize Fischer's personality problems to the rest of the US Champions, who for the most part are pretty level headed and reasonable people.

Jun-12-07  cotdt: <krish.adam: This is the price Kamsky has to pay for relinquishing chess when he was World# 3 and going for an academic exercise. While higher education is important, there is something called timing. He could have pursued it later after retirement. A talent such as this is God-given and doesn't happen for everybody. He should have respected that skill and continued to play professional chess. Why are the chess champions from the US (Bobby and Gata) are so screwed up?> it was his father's decision for gata to quit chess, because he lost to karpov
Jun-12-07  Monoceros: <krish.adam: This is the price Kamsky has to pay for relinquishing chess when he was World# 3 and going for an academic exercise.>

What!! This is a bunch of crap. You try going for a law degree and see how far you get at that "academic exercise".

I respect Kamsky tremendously for going off to do something else with his life and still doing well after his return. Is he among the best of the best any more? Probably not. But he's still competitive. I hope he tries again.

Jun-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: It is good Kamsky does other things - it doesn't matter if he is not World Champion - his life will be enriched and he will be remembered as a great player also.

Fischer concentrated on Chess - became WC - but so what? The guy is a mess - who would want be him or know the conceited and racist pig he is?

Jun-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Kamsky still has it. He just needs to catch up with the latest openings theory and be more active chessic wise. He'll be back.
Jun-21-07  Cactus: Don't forget Yasser Seirewan. He was a good, level headed American.
Jun-21-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: <Don't forget Yasser Seirewan. He was a good, level headed American.>

Which is why he almost punched Kasparov in the face?

Jun-21-07  strifeknot: Wanting to punch Kasparov in the face is an urge any sane and reasonable person would have.
Jun-22-07  dehanne: I thought I had seen Kasparov in the subway yesterday evening.. but it was just Eros Ramazotti.
Dec-09-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: 11...d5!! is considered a drawing line, but Kamsky proved that White can avoid a draw if he's determined enough . . . .
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC