chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wesley So vs Michael Adams
London Chess Classic (2016), London ENG, rd 2, Dec-10
Catalan Opening: Closed Variation (E06)  ·  1-0

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
Notes by Stockfish 9 v010218 (minimum 6s/ply)better is 15.Rfd1 Bxc3 16.bxc3 Be4 17.Qa2 Nc6 18.Be1 Re8 19.c4 Nb4 ⩲ +0.63 (21 ply)better is 15...Bxc3 16.bxc3 Be4 17.Qc1 Nc6 18.Rd1 Qe7 19.Be3 Nd5 = +0.01 (24 ply) ⩲ +0.70 (24 ply)better is 18...Bxc3 19.Bxc3 exd4 20.Rad1 Rxc6 21.Rxd4 Qe7 22.e4 b6 = +0.32 (22 ply)better is 19.Bg2 dxc3 20.bxc3 Bc5 21.Red1 Qe7 22.c4 Ng4 23.h3 Nxf2 ⩲ +0.93 (22 ply)= +0.32 (23 ply)better is 21.Red1 Nd7 22.c4 Qf6 23.Bxa5 Rb2 24.Qe4 Ne5 25.Kg2 Nxf3 ⩲ +0.75 (24 ply)= +0.05 (30 ply) after 21...Rxb1 22.Rxb1 b6 23.c4 Qd6 24.Bc3 Qe6 25.Bb2 Re8 better is 36...h5 37.h3 Qh6 38.h4 Qe6 39.Qxe6+ Kxe6 40.g4 hxg4 = +0.41 (25 ply) ⩲ +0.95 (28 ply) 37...h5 38.f5 Qh6 39.e5 f6 40.Qe2 fxe5 41.Bxe5 Qe3 42.Bd3 ⩲ +0.79 (27 ply)+- +2.76 (28 ply) 38...Qd6 39.Qxd6+ Kxd6 40.Bxg7 h5 41.Bd1 Ke7 42.Bb2 b5 ± +2.35 (25 ply)+- +4.53 (28 ply)40...fxe6 41.Bc7 Qe3 42.Qd8+ Kf7 43.Qd7+ Kf8 44.Kh3 Qf3 +- +4.12 (26 ply)1-0

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 52 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more So/Adams games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-10-16  JASAHA: So beats Adams as the latter blunders a piece. Looks like Adams was trying to activate his pieces while trying to avoid having his Queen trapped. Over the space of 3 moves the evaluation for So went from less than +1 to +3 with a won game. So's pieces seemed to dominate the board and personally I think Adams should have been looking to reduce firepower by swapping Queens.
Dec-10-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Morning: And the interesting move is the move unplayed--28...Qxc4. 29.Qd8+,Kh7; 30.Bxf6,gxf6; 31.Qxf6 might follow. Is this significantly worse than the game? Or have I missed another simple tactical shot?
Dec-10-16  Eyal: <And the interesting move is the move unplayed--28...Qxc4. 29.Qd8+,Kh7; 30.Bxf6,gxf6; 31.Qxf6 might follow. Is this significantly worse than the game? Or have I missed another simple tactical shot?>

Best for White seems to be 29. Bxf6 gxf6 30. Bd5 Qb4 (anything else just loses to White's next move) 31. Qh5 Qb1+ 32. Kg2 Qh7 33. Qg4+ followed by 34. Qc8+ & Qxc7 with a clear advantage.

In the game itself, 37...Nc7? appears to be the decisive mistake - 38. f5! Qg5 (38... Qd6 39. Qxd6+ followed by 40. Bxg7) 39. Be5! attacking the knight and also threatening to trap the queen (e.g., 39... Ne8 40. Bf4 Qh5 41. Bd1, or 40... Qf6 41. e5).

Dec-10-16  Sokrates: This was not about blundering a piece but setting up an awkward and flawed defense against So's sound and powerful gameplay.
Dec-10-16  WorstPlayerEver: 39... Ne6 was almost forced. White threatens to win the Black Queen with Bf4> Qg4 Bd1 or Qf6 e5
Dec-10-16  JASAHA: There is no doubt that move Ne6 blunders a piece (and that the black Q was ridiculously on the verge of being trapped). Adams should have kept his Q on the d file and used one of his many chances to swap Qs. The game went downhill quickly after 37... Nc7, 38 f5, Qg5. Ne6 was the culmination of a series of miscalculations. Until Nc7 Adams may still have had a chance to make a game of it.
Dec-10-16  Eyal: Btw, Adams lost on time before making his 40th move, but 40... Qxe5 ("regaining" the piece) obviously leads to a quick mate: 41. Qd7+ Kf6 42. Qxf7+ Kg5 43. h4+ Kg4 44. Bd1#.
Dec-10-16  iking: 2nd time that Adams lost in the endgame phase .. he seems can't handle time trouble ...
Dec-10-16  Everett: Endgame where? With a queen and two minors on the board?
Dec-10-16  rhinox12: Welcome Wesley for breaking 2800 barrier
Dec-10-16  allan.dinglasan: Congratulations Grandmaster Wesley so for breaching the 2800 mark! Parang kailan lang n we we're rooting that he will make it the 2700 club.
Dec-11-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: If black just plays 34...QxQ is his endgame so hopeless? When your position is being invaded like that it's a good time to get rid of the queens, so you can activate your king and fix your defensive structure.

Perhaps Adams saw a win for white in the queenless endgame?

Dec-11-16  evlozare: gmwesley only highlighted the power of the bishop pair.
Dec-12-16  jerseybob: <HeMateMe: If black just plays 34...QxQ is his endgame so hopeless?...Perhaps Adams saw a win for white in the queenless endgame?> I don't see a forced win, but after 35.cxd5 white has to have an edge.
Dec-13-16  iking: <Everett: Endgame where? With a queen and two minors on the board?> ..oh, i did not know that ..40th move and still in the middle game where time trouble usually culminated... good observation.
Dec-13-16  Kamagong42: blunder!!!
Dec-23-16  Toribio3: GM Adams was a strong player before. Maybe his prowess in chess attack is no longer there to confront with brutal force!
Dec-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Time was when Adams was the youngster, thirsting with ambition to reach the pinnacle, and players such as Timman, Andersson and Karpov had to be overcome; now the wheel has come full circle and Adams is himself amongst the hunted.

I'm here to tell you, Father Time is one tough ole bugger.

Dec-29-16  knightF5: <GM Adams was a strong player before.>

Adams has not actually weakened much. His peak was 2761 in 2013 and he is now 2751. Just 10 elos off his all time high.

Oppositions have grown stronger, especially Wesley.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC