chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Adolf Anderssen vs Howard Staunton
London (1851), London ENG, rd 3, Jun-??
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen-Basman Defense (B40)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 88 times; par: 56 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Anderssen/Staunton games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-01-08  HOTDOG: 6...Ba7 is a strange move,then 9...d6 seems better to avoid e5,and Black is perhaps already lost at this point. 11.Rae1! is a very deep move;16.g4 instead seems losing the advantage,better was the immediate 16.Kh1!;18...Qa5! is a very strong move and almost forced,but White is still better and he can strike with 22.g5!;23...Qd5+?! is not the decisive mistake,but better was 23...Rd8 although White still has a won position,although after 23...Qd5+ the simple 24.Kg1 seems better for White.24...Ne7? is the decisive mistake,Black had to move the rook to give space for the King or play 24...Qxd3.after 24...Ne7? Black has no defense
Feb-01-08  Knight13: 6...a7 is not the strange move, the strange move is 4...Bc5, which is not a good one.
Feb-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: 4...Bc5 is common enough, and has been played several times by cg.com's own Gerard Welling.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

<gejewe> if you see this, it would be interesting to have your comments on this opening and where Black goes wrong. I would guess that Black's position is hopeless by move 16.

Feb-03-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: I am copying this from Mr. Welling's page.

<Gejewe: <keypusher> After the initial moves I prefer the active 5.Nc3 Qb6!? for example 1) 6.Na4 Qa5+ 7.c3 Bxd4 8.Qxd4 Nf6 ( two bishops but Na4 is clumsy ) 2) 6.Be3 Nc6 and the pawn sacrifice 7.Ndb5 Bxe3 leads to an unclear position but control of e5 should help black. I remember a matchgame Harstston-Basman, England 1974 as a good example how black should play. Staunton was a bit passive, 6..Qc7 was suggested in contemporary sources and Staunton was very critical on his play in this particular game in general.>

I think this is the Hartston-Basman game he refers to:

Hartston vs M Basman, 1973

Apr-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  takchess: http://blunderprone.blogspot.com/20...

This game is annotated here.

Jun-20-09  heuristic: mo' better moves :

11...d5 12.Nf3 Nc6 13.Bxa7 Rxa7 14.a3

12.Nf3 Nc6 13.Bx7 Rxa7 14.Ne4 Qd8

16.Kh1 b4 17.a3 bxa3 18.bxa3 Rab8

16...Bxe3+ 17.Rxe6 Qb6 18.Qh3 Rad8 19.Bd3

19...Qb4 20.Bb7 Qc4 21.Rg1 Rd7 22.Bc6

22...Qd5+ 23.Rff3 Ne7 24.gxh6 g6 25.Qg5

Sep-11-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <heuristic> <11...d5 12.Nf3 Nc6 13.Bxa7 Rxa7 14.a3>

How about 11...d5 12. exd6 Qxd6 13. Qf3? Or, after 12. Nf3 Nc6 13. Bxa7 Rxa7, instead of 14. a3, 14. Ng5 h6 15. Nxf7 Nxf4 16. Rxf4 Rxf7 17. Ref1 Nxe5 18. Rxf7 Nxf7 19. Qg6?

Aug-31-10  dzhafner: why not 8... d6?

if 9 Qg4 ... 0-0
and if 10 Bh6?? ... Ng6 (the hanging bishop, knight, and threat of e5 seem difficult to meet) 11 Bg5 ... Qb6 (11 Be3 .. e5)

Black should be able to get in 9 ...Nf6 and possibly continue with ...e5, ...Nd4 la Adams vs Hydra, 2005 as jaymthetactician pointed out.

May-04-12  LoveThatJoker: Guess-the-Move Final Score:

Anderssen vs Staunton, 1851.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF ANDERSSEN.
Your score: 63 (par = 56)

LTJ

Nov-27-14  Knight13: The way Black developed his pieces... There's a lesson to be learned.
Dec-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ziryab: 13...Nc6 leads to an interesting training position. What is White's best reply?
Dec-18-14  Knight13: <Ziryab: 13...Nc6 leads to an interesting training position. What is White's best reply?> 14. Ng5: ... h6 15. Nxf7, etc.
Dec-18-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: If I were to travel to the 19th century (pre-Steinitz) and face a strong player (ex. Anderseen), in response to 1.e4, I'd probably play 1...c5 or something to try to get them offtrack. Unfortunately, this game proves otherwise...

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Dec-18-14  Knight13: <Penguincw> Keep in mind that they didn't know how to "properly" play Black's side of Sicilian in pre-Steinitz times, either....
Dec-18-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Penguincw> The Sicilian was probably more in vogue in 1851 (to Morphy's disgust) than it would be for 90 years after. Anderssen was particularly good with it, I think.

Steinitz vs Anderssen, 1866

Apr-10-15  rwbean: 15. c3 is +1.00 (Stockfish 6, 36 ply).

18. f5 is +2.67 (Stockfish 6, 37 ply). PV is like 18. f5 ♕xe5 19. ♗g2 ♕xb2 20. Bg5 ♖d7 21. fxg6 hxg6 22. ♕h4. This means 17... c5 was a serious error - better 17 ... ♗xe3.

Then it seems the final error is 19... ♕a4 instead of 19... ♕b4.

28. ♕f6+ is mate in 10.

Aug-15-15  saturn2: <Knight13 the strange move is 4...Bc5, which is not a good one.> Bc5 is more common after black has already played a6 and white has already played Nc3. The reason seems as follows: White could play 5.Nb3 and develope the other knight via d2 to c4 later on and whites e4-e5 is looming. Black can prevent this by d6 but then the d file gets opened and after Qd1xQd8 the castling is spoiled.

Actually e5 happened also in the game but white could have exploited the move ..4 Bc4 even better

Sep-22-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: In the tournament book at the end of this game Staunton states:

"Let the reader compare this game, which would be discreditable to two third-rate players of a coffee-house, with any of the match game in which Black has taken part heretofore, and say how far the result of this mere mockery of Chess is a proof of the absolute powers of two men who are called proficients."

I've copied it word for word. I think he is saying in his own sweet way that Black [Staunton] played an awful game of chess.

(adding to the confusion this note actually appears in the middle of the next game but it's marker '*' refers the reader back to the last move of the previous game. - this game.)

page 111 here:

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id...

Jun-08-16  zanzibar: <Sally> yes, I was just about to add the same passage that you have done.

But, I think Staunton is also putting a knock on Anderssen as well as himself, when he uses phraseology like:

<discreditable to two third-rate players of a coffee-house ... mockery ... of two men who are called proficients.>

in reference to the game, and not just Black's play.

Of course parsing his writing is laborious in this matter. Still, I've read in more than one place the opinion that Staunton was rather unfair and unkind to Anderssen in the London (1851) TB.

Jun-08-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <But, I think Staunton is also putting a knock on Anderssen as well as himself, when he uses phraseology like: <discreditable to two third-rate players of a coffee-house ... mockery ... of two men who are called proficients.>

in reference to the game, and not just Black's play.>

<zanzibar> Of course that is what Staunton is doing.

I've had the London 1851 tournament book for a long time. Staunton's evaluation heuristic is simple: If he wins, it's a good, probably even great game. If he loses, it's a terrible game.

If you beat Staunton (Anderssen, Elijah Williams) you're a bad player and a bad person. If you lose to Staunton (Horwitz, Jaenisch) you're a fine master and a prince among men.

Jun-09-16  zanzibar: <keypusher> Some more comments by Staunton:

Biographer Bistro (kibitz #14371)

Feb-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: The <TB> score ends with <32.Rf2>. Does any source give the extra moves?
Feb-25-19  sneaky pete: <MS> Schachzeitung February 1852, page 44. I noticed before that Staunton clipped a lot of games, not only some played by Williams. Anderssen was one of the editors of Schachzeitung.
Feb-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Games 4 and 5 of this match carry definite dates: June 23rd and 25th, respectively, but I'm a little distrustful without specific sources. Does the <SZ>'s coverage provide any useful information regarding the tournament schedule in general (excluding the first round, that is)?
Feb-26-19  sneaky pete: Schachzeitung has no dates or anything useful about the schedule at all. The tournament reports in the May/June and the July issues are a translation of (most of) what Staunton wrote as Introduction in the tournament book.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
game 2
from GM RAM Game Selection by redlance
+4 -1 =0 vs. Staunton (London, semifinal)
from Match Anderssen! by chessgain
B40 1-0 33
from Anderssen - Blackburne - Charousek - Fredthebear by fredthebear
19th century
by pim
gibz's favorite games
by gibz
game 2
from GM RAM Game Selection by artifex maximus
dogged focus on the Kside
from attack_1900 by heuristic
World Championship
by IsmaelElzara
e6 defenses of Fredthebear that delay or omit d5
by fredthebear
White - Sicilian: Anderssen
by gaborn
Sicilian Attack Plan
from chess strategems vi - under construction by gauer
game 2
from GM RAM Game Selection by RookHook
+4 -1 =0 vs. Staunton (London, semifinal)
from vaskolon's PAUL MORPHY'S GAMES by vaskolon
Game 2
from Chess Secrets - Romantics (Pritchett) by Qindarka
game 2
from GM RAM Game Selection by takking
gm ram games
by chessloser68
joniefidelino's favorite games
by joniefidelino
game 2
from GM RAM Game Selection by takchess
game 2
from GM RAM Game Selection by Jersey Joe
Ziyatdinov's game score goes to 33.Rg3 1-0
from GM-RAM by Pragmatist
plus 11 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC