chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Chigorin vs Wilhelm Steinitz
London (1899), London ENG, rd 16, Jun-20
Ponziani Opening: General (C44)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 58 more Chigorin/Steinitz games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-25-04  drukenknight: another well played Ponziani. IN his game vs Bird, Chigorin played 10 Re1+, interesting how he must have studied that move. I guess this is main line, blacks messed up q side pawns, he has to live with. At the end, I thought steinitz needed to push the pawn to g4 rather quickly.
Oct-06-07  RookFile: Chigorin kept this game complex, and then was able to show off his skills at calculation.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: This game is the last time these two immortals of the chessboard crossed swords. Sadly, it is not one of their better contests.

Steinitz once again burdened himself with a bad opening, this time a poor variation as Black against Tchigorin's Ponziani Opening. Given that Bird played the identical line against Tchigorin nine rounds later, this variation may represent contemporary wisdom as to how to combat this opening, though it is hard to see why anyone would think this line was best play for Black.

The Tournament Book's comments notwithstanding, Tchigorin's 10. Rd1 here is far inferior to the simple 10. Bxd3 Tchigorin played against Bird in the later game. It certainly seems as if Tchigorin had studied this opening between this game and the time of his game against Bird, and that Bird faced more enterprising play. As the opening went here, after Tchigorin's questionable 13. Bf4 (instead of the indicated 13. Nd2) Steinitz could have achieved near equality with 13...Bd7.

But Steinitz had unjustified ideas of an attack on the b-file and played 13...Rb8, allowing Tchigorin to work up all sorts of threats. Having made this questionable move, Steinitz should at least have followed through on his idea and after Tchigorin's 15. Nd2 have played 15...Rxb2. The Tournament Book states that this move by Steinitz would have lost the exchange after 16. Nb3, but after 16...Nd5 17. Qa3 Steinitz would have had a draw with 17...Rxf2!! 18. KxR Qe3+ 19. Kf1 Bxh3!! 20. gxB Qxh3+ with a perpetual check [if 21. Ke1 Qe3+ and now 22. Be2 leads to mate in 2 for Black].

The move Steinitz actually made, 15...Nd5 should have landed him in trouble after 16. Nc4, but Tchigorin let Steinitz off the hook with 16. Qh4. Steinitz was now fine until his careless 17...Nf6, which overlooked Tchigorin's Knight fork with 18. Nd4. This was clearly not the Steinitz of old.

Once Steinitz lost a pawn, he apparently decided to try a coffee-house attack against his fabled opponent. Not surprisingly, these wild tactics did not work against a master of combinations like Tchigorin.

By move 25, Steinitz was down a Knight, and could safely have resigned. As a final indignity, however, he walked into Tchigorin's neat 29. Qxe4. Since Steinitz couldn't take Tchigorin's Queen because this would have allowed 30. Rd8+, the game came to a sudden and horrible end for Steinitz.

As I have said before on this site, watching Steinitz in this his last tournament is sad. He was old, sick, financially ruined,and no longer able to play at anything approaching the level of his glory years (though he did manage to end the Tournament with a surprising win over Janowski).

We should remember the great Steinitz based on his championship play over three decades and not for this last tournament, the only one in which he failed to win even a minor prize.

Jan-29-17  morfishine: <KEG> Why do you droll on with such nonsense about "immortals"? Or are you in actuality just trying to attract attention to yourself?

Good lord, the violins are weeping themselves

*****

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <KEG>, that was probably the best posting in the history of chessgames.com, and some of us here, particularly me, would like to buy you a drink and shake your hand.

And <KEG> I just want you to know that when the going got tough, you got us all going.

Loneliness, that's the bottom line.

Steinitz was never happy as a child.

Christmas <KEG>, what does that mean to you? It was living hell for Steinitz. Do you know what it's like falling in the mud and getting kicked in the head with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. That never happens. Sorry <KEG>, that's a dumb question.

Municipal bonds <KEG>, I'm talking double A rating the best investment in America. Steinitz missed out!

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: <morfishine> Steinitz and Tchigorin are "immortal" because the memory of them will last as long as there are those who love chess and chess history.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: <offramp> So glad you enjoyed my post on this game.

In response to your question, I have never experienced the despair you suggest Steinitz lived through. On the other hand, I have never experienced the joy it must be to be able to play at the level Steinitz achieved or to have the profound insights he had concerning chess.

Jan-29-17  morfishine: <KEG> I stand corrected <offramp> put it best

*****

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Ponziani Opening: General (C44) 1-0 Extra piece
from f3 B & C taught Fredthebear how to ski by fredthebear
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
Ponziani Opening: General (C44) 1-0 Extra piece
from 1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear
Santasiere's "My Love Affair With Tchigorin"
by Resignation Trap
Game 54
from World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
the rivals 1
by ughaibu
chigorin 10
from great attack games by emilio martinez


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC