chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vasily Smyslov vs Efim Geller
USSR Championship (1955), Moscow URS, rd 7, Apr-??
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch. Closed Variation Main Line (E89)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 18 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Smyslov/Geller games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-04-02  ughaibu: Smyslov was another victim.
Dec-05-02  PVS: Geller played two matches with Smyslov and won them both. This game is the lone decisive game from the first, which was necessitated by the two having shared first place in the USSR championship that year. The second was a Candidates match in 1965, Geller won big +3=5. It seems Smyslov went wrong after 24Nxe4.
Dec-05-02  ughaibu: I get the impression that Smyslov lost track in the opening. h3 and g3 look horrible.
Dec-05-02  PVS: 11. h3 makes no sense, and 12. g3 is not much better. He needed to do something on the c-file.
Dec-30-04  PivotalAnorak: If 35. ♔f2 ♗f6 !
Apr-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Geller's account of this deciding playoff game, which made him the Soviet Champion:

<Although this variation is not considered disadvantageous to White I knew very well that Smyslov had never previously played it in serious play, and the type of game arising from it hardly suited his style. And in fact, instead of castling long, he wasted valuable time in preparing to castle Kingside. Hence it was not difficult to gain control of valuable central squares.

White's King was in danger and Smyslov played for simplifications, exchanging queens and hoping for an ending. By a temporary knight sacrifice, I succeeded in destroying White's defensive set-up and my rooks and bishops penetrated into his king's position. The attack grew in strength and faced with the threat of heavy material loss, Smyslov resigned. Victory!...>

Apr-02-08  xrt999: Beautiful game! After 29...Be5 you can amlost feel Smyslov's blood pressure rising as he is slowly being constricted to death.

All of black's pieces are harmoniously leering into white's confused space; black has the active bishop pair and controls the open c-file. White makes one feeble attempt to extricate himself from black's clutches and is crushed with pinpoint precision and efficiency by Grandmaster Geller.

Apr-18-08  Jim Bartle: <And in fact, instead of castling long, he wasted valuable time in preparing to castle Kingside. Hence it was not difficult to gain control of valuable central squares.>

Curious, since I've always thought 5. f3 virtually commits white to castling long later. Not in all variations, but in most.

Mar-24-09  parisattack: <<Although this variation is not considered disadvantageous to White I knew very well that Smyslov had never previously played it in serious play, and the type of game arising from it hardly suited his style. And in fact, instead of castling long, he wasted valuable time in preparing to castle Kingside. Hence it was not difficult to gain control of valuable central squares.

White's King was in danger and Smyslov played for simplifications, exchanging queens and hoping for an ending. By a temporary knight sacrifice, I succeeded in destroying White's defensive set-up and my rooks and bishops penetrated into his king's position. The attack grew in strength and faced with the threat of heavy material loss, Smyslov resigned. Victory!...> >

'Until Geller we didn't understand the King's Indian' - Botvinnik.

Geller one of the great Power Players of all time - Pillsbury-Keres-Geller-Stein...

Oct-07-09  Everett: <parisattack:
<'Until Geller we didn't understand the King's Indian' - Botvinnik>>

Classic! I guess Botvinnik never did quite understand what was going on with his games against Bronstein.

Oct-07-09  ughaibu: In 1951? Game 21 was the only kings indian, I think, Bronstein won.
Oct-13-09  Everett: I don't know the date of the Botvinnik quote, but he and Bronstein played 3 KIDs. Moreover, Bronstein and Boleslavsky were playing it consistently, with good results and "understanding" before Geller. Bronstein's famous wins came three years before 1949. So, Botvinnik seems to either be ignorant or, probably, being intentionally disrespectful.

Game Collection: King's Indian pioneers

Oct-13-09  WhiteRook48: 36 Kg3 Rxe1 37 Kxg4 RE4+
Oct-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  stoy: According to Bronstein's wife, her dying husband named Geller, not himself, as the greatest player of the KID!
Oct-13-09  Everett: <stoy> Coming from Bronstein, I believe it!

It's interesting that Spassky completely avoided Geller's KID in '65 and '68.

I certainly take no credit away from Geller. The quote from Botvinnik is a clear exaggeration, however.

Dec-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <PVS>This game is the lone decisive game from the first, which was necessitated by the two having shared first place in the USSR championship that year.

<FVS>,
The first 6 games of the play-off match were drawn.

Dec-25-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jim Bartle> From vast experience of the Saemisch, I can tell you that White usually goes in for long castling.
Oct-30-14  tranquilsimplicity: <Everett> I believe you may be right with regards to Botvinnik's attempt to disrespect Bronstein with attributing the advent and great understanding of the King's Indian Defence to Geller.

I happen to be a King's Indian Defence practitioner and have learned this opening from Bronstein and Geller, in that order. Bronstein's understanding and employment of the King's Indian is well known. Geller, Tal, Fischer etc all played it later; albeit with almost the same depth of understanding as Bronstein (if perhaps not more, I don't know). But it is my sincere belief that the famous statement by Botvinnik was an insult to Bronstein.#

Oct-30-14  tranquilsimplicity: But then again I have to be truly honest and add that I adopted Geller's set ups that continue with ..Nd7 as opposed to Bronstein's ..Nc6. I play this defence la Geller.#
Nov-05-14  tranquilsimplicity: I have come across new information that has compelled me to revise my position stated in my penultimate post. Botvinnik once claimed that in his opinion, Geller was the strongest player in the world in the late 1960s. With that in mind, it is very possible that Botvinnik's assertion regarding the understanding of the King's Indian Defence pertaining to Geller's contribution may have been genuine. And therefore not an insult to Bronstein.#
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 8
by 0ZeR0
Power Chess - Geller
by Anatoly21
Efim Geller's Best Games
by alip
Game 95
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by demirchess
Grandmaster Geller: The First Quarter Century
by Resignation Trap
Efim Geller's Best Games
by KingG
Game 95
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 95
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Game #29
from King's Indian pioneers by keywiz84
Geller 1955 (probably the strongest USSR championship)
from Behind the Iron curtain by Open Defence
Game 95
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (2) by nakul1964
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game #90
from The most beautiful games in chess 3 by keywiz84
All decided by tactics
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964
Assorted good games II
by rbaglini
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Game 95
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by isfsam
KID: Saemisch. Closed Variation. Main Line
from MKD's KID by MKD
Game 70
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Qindarka
24... Ne4
from The Best Chess Games (part 3) by Dr Esenville
plus 11 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC