Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Grigory Levenfish
"A Masterful Attack" (game of the day Oct-13-2018)
Moscow (1935), Moscow URS, rd 19, Mar-14
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran. Stahlberg Variation (D49)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 46 times; par: 17 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Capablanca/Levenfish games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "D49"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-26-10  randomsac: Once again the queen and knight team up for a lethal combination.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Capa can attack---as well as sharks can hunt.
Jun-26-10  SuperPatzer77: After 26. Qg6+, Black resigns in lieu of 26...Kf8, 27. Nxh8! (stronger than 27. Nxd8 and threatening 28. Qf7#) Qe8 (only move), 28. Qh6+ Kg8, 29. Qh7+ Kf8, 30. Ng6+ Qxg6, 31. Bxg6 (forcing the inevitable mate in next move) 1-0


Jun-26-10  DarthStapler: 28. Bh7+ Kxh8 29. Bg6+ Kg8 30. Qh7+ Kf8 31. Qh8# is faster
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: <randomsac: Once again the queen and knight team up for a lethal combination.>

Indeed. I read somewhere that some grandmasters have a saying "queen and knight, you'll be alright". Perhaps the queen and knight combine so well because they don't share each others powers, and this allows them to cover more squares for tactics like mating combinations.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: Great win by white, with excellent pressure applied to black's position.

Black had defensive resources, however, that he did not employ.

17... Bc7, as mentioned by <Mateo> in 2005, looks pretty good for black.

click for larger view

It protects against the knight fork on c6, and if 18 Ng4, then 18...g6 looks good.

click for larger view

White still has the bishop skewer on c6, with a small advantage to work with thereafter.

Black also had 19...h5, below, which protects against the devastating text move 20 Ng4.

click for larger view

Jun-26-10  SuperPatzer77: <DarthStapler: 28. Bh7+ Kxh8 29. Bg6+ Kg8 30. Qh7+ Kf8 31. Qh8# is faster>

You use the incorrect move number - 28. Bh7+ - the correct move number should be 29. Bh7+.

It is mate on the 32nd move below:

Your analysis is as follows:

29. Bh7+ Kxh8, 30. Bg6+ Kg8, 31. Qh7+ Kf8, <32. Qh8#>

Mine is as follows:

29. Qh7+ Kf8, 30. Ng6+ Qxg6, 31. Bxg6 any bishop move, <32. Qf7#>

It is not faster than mine. It's just the 32nd move of both analyses.

Well, it doesn't matter if your analysis is faster than mine. Just a win is a win (period).


Jun-26-10  screwdriver: great game
Mar-27-11  Whitehat1963: How can it both LOOK so simple and be so difficult for Guess the Move?
Nov-09-11  visayanbraindoctor: Going into an ultra-sharp opening like this Meran variation was never Capablanca's common practice. He prepped his opening here.

11. Nxb5

click for larger view

Such prepared opening sac variations do not occur in the normal Capablanca game. It might be unsurprising in an Alekhine game, or might occur more familiarly with modern GMs who have these prepared variations ready to spring on their opponents (who hopefully did not prepare as well and would get lost quickly in the complications). I would like to know if Capablanca has other similar games in which he sprung a sharp previously prepared opening variation.

Nov-09-11  visayanbraindoctor: Note aside, if Capablanca had been diligent enough to have prepped most of his openings in such razor sharp variations, especially during his earlier years when he could wade through any complications out-calculating every one, what games he could have produced!

Just imagine dozens of Capablanca games with razor sharp openings leading to whirlwind attacks just like those of Alekhine or Kasparov's.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <talchess2003: A sharp game would have arisen after: 11. exf6 dxc3 12. fxg7 Bxg7 (12... cxb2 13. gxh8=Q bxa1=Q 14. Qxf8+! Kxf8 15. Ba3+) 13. Qc2 cxb2 and now white will face two appealing prospects of recapture. I would not mind playing white in this position, even though he is a pawn down he has good chances> [from Dec-17-03]

The comment quoted above from eight years ago is remarkable for the large number of obvious flaws contained in a short paragraph. <Chessical> has already commented that <13. Nc5> (in lieu of <13. cxb2>?) is a big improvement for Black in <talchess2003>s proposed main line. In addition, in the variation with <12. cxb2>?, the suggested <14. Qxf8> (annotated with ! in the original post) probably deserves ?? because after <14. Nxf8>, White is completely lost. On the other hand, in this line the obvious <14. Qxa1> is totally winning.

As far as the whole idea of <11. exf6> is concerned, it is dismissed by theory. According to Opening Explorer, the only example currently in the database is: E Kursk vs Keres, 1935, 0-1 in 30 moves, even though (as pointed out at page 44 of this thread: Kramnik vs Anand, 2008) Keres did not play the clearly winning <14. Bxc3+> (with <15. Bxa1> to follow), presumably due to exaggerated fears of dark-square weaknesses in this line.

Jul-27-13  builttospill: Been thinking about converting to a d4 player, so I'm testing things out on Guess-the-Move. From the looks of it this game has been heavily analyzed. But just in case anyone missed it, I had a strong recollection of a chess puzzle I'd solved from CT-Art as I was playing through. Perhaps not the same exact game, but a very similar theme.

On move 22 I saw a very clear mate to follow, as after Nxf6 Bxf6, black does not have the luxury of pushing his f pawn (which would block the light squared bishop -- the reason for Capa's zig-zagging queen moves in the game variation).

Anyway, after Qxh6 Re8, Bh7+ wins. (With Bg6+, Qh7+ and Qxf7# to follow. ) More forcing than the game continuation.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: builttospill> After 22. Nxf6+!? Black can coolly reply Kg7. So Nxh6 is best.
Oct-04-13  builttospill: <Calli> Sorry I missed your comment. But you are absolutely right, of course. I've been in the habit of calculating forcing lines first, but forgot to look at your line.
Oct-04-13  RookFile: Hard to find a defense after 17. Qh3. White has possibilities of:

1) Nc6
2) a knight move followed by Bc7
3) Bg5 with mating ideas on h7
4) g4 and g5

The one thing black does have is the nominal advantage of an extra pawn. You almost want to play 17....Rxe5 and get it over with, but over course, that is death against Capablanca - you're going to lose any random endgame when he has that kind of advantage.

Premium Chessgames Member
  naresb: There appears to be some refinement needed because multiple probabilities could open up. After 20. Ng4, Black plays 20... Be7, but he could have opted for:-- 20... e5 With this Bc8 pins Ng4-Qh3. Also Ng4 is now under attack by Bc8, Nf6. There are various ways with which both players can react to.

(A) White decides to delay exchange of White Bishop and Black Knight.

21. Bh4; h5
22. BxNf6; gxBh6
23. Nh6+; Kh8
24. Nxf7+; RxNf7
25. Qxh6+; Kg8
26. Qh7+; Kf8
27. Qh8+; Ke7
28. Qh5; and white has to struggle to gain superiority.

(B) White decides for immediate exchange of Black Knight with White Bishop.

21. BxNf6; gxBf6
22. Nxh6+; Kg7
23. Qh5; Qe7
24. Qg3+; Kf8 and in the absence of dark squared White bishop, White has to struggle to gain command over the situation.

(C) White decides to immediately attack Black King with White Knight.

20... e5
21. Nxh6+; gxNh6
22. Qxh6; Re8
23. BxNf6; Bf8
24. Qh7+ # (1-0)

Oct-13-18  PJs Studio: At first I thought; 21...gxf6? Really? Then I saw the rejoinder 22. Nxh6+! Levinfish was way too good of a player to make that mistake, but by this point Im sure he was sweating.

Another Capablanca brilliancy!

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: If Capablanca worked as hard as Fischer worked at chess, then Alekhine might be just another Keres - a great player who could never win the title.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Hi thegoodanarchist,

Possibly...but Fischer had Capablanca's games to study and work hard with to help him become a great player.

Capablanca was a great gifted player and already a world champion. Whose games was he going to study to improve and where was his motivation. Very few players tipped Alekhine to beat him in 1927.


Oct-13-18  Daft1: If 21 BxF6 then 22 Nxh6 g7xh6 23 Qxh6 Re8 24 Bh7 Kh8 25 Bg6 and black is helpless against Qh7 followed by Qf7
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Sally Simpson: ***

Hi thegoodanarchist,

Possibly...but Fischer had Capablanca's games to study and work hard with to help him become a great player.

Capablanca was a great gifted player and already a world champion. Whose games was he going to study to improve and where was his motivation. Very few players tipped Alekhine to beat him in 1927.>

Well, if he were as good as he claimed to be ("I know it!"), there was the field of opening preparation. It was wide open to him.

How many variations <could have> been named "The Capablanca Variation"?

Oct-13-18  cormier: Opening Explorer
Oct-13-18  cormier: and then ... Opening Explorer
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: This last round win enabled Capablanca to finish Moscow (1935) only half a point behind Lasker, and a point behind the joint winners Botvinnik and Flohr.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98. "A murderous attack"
from Immortal Games of Capablanca, F. Reinfeld by Incremental
Game 71: Biography - Capablanca (Linder)
from Short games by masters by rbaglini
Ne5 to g5 when Nf6 pinned
from Delicatessen by Gottschalk
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt
Complex favorites
by Whitehat1963
Game 12
from Move by Move - Capablanca (Lakdawala) by Qindarka
Game 481
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by demirchess
Game 69
from World Champion - Capablanca (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
June 26: Slav to Love
from Game of the Day 2010 by Phony Benoni
from 500 Master Games of Chess III (part 2) by alachabre
Meran and Chigorin Variations
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamr by fredthebear
Capablanca demonstrating an almost perfect technique!
from sungura mjanja's favorite games by sungura mjanja
The Games of J. R. Capablanca
by mariofrisini
Game 407
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Jersey Joe
Semi-Slav Def: Meran. Stahlberg Var (D49) 1-0 Nxh6 Kside smash
from Noot Soo Loong Games in Fredthebear's Gallery by fredthebear
Reti63's Guess the Move Games
by Reti63
21. Bxf6 , 22.Nxh6+ exposes king to attack
from Mate/ combinations by avidfan
Moscow 1935
by JoseTigranTalFischer
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by Chessdreamer
Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games
by alip
plus 52 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC