Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Frank James Marshall vs Emanuel Lasker
St. Petersburg (1914), St. Petersburg RUE, rd 5, May-15
Old Indian Defense: General (A53)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 23 times; par: 44 [what's this?]

Annotations by Siegbert Tarrasch.      [16 more games annotated by Tarrasch]

explore this opening
find similar games 24 more Marshall/Lasker games
sac: 26...Bc2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
May-15-06  ChessDude33: Lol, Lasker had a little Tal in him this game.
May-15-06  TylerD: Lasker often did, actually... He introduced the Tal-element to chess one might say... So, maybe, it should be called the Lasker-element instead...
Premium Chessgames Member
  laskereshevsky: Not for nothing Lasker was the TAL's favourite player.....
Jan-31-11  TheOutsider: Tarrasch is wrong here

21..Nxd3 is better

Jul-08-12  ughaibu: Keypusher: Does Soltis agree with Tarrasch?
Jul-11-13  kappertjes: <15. h3? Very feebly played and almost inexplicable except for Lasker's queer knack of 'willing' his opponents to make weak moves. Against any other opponent Marshall almost certainly would have played 15 Bg5, gaining the advantage in every variation. It looks almost like witchcraft.>

Sounds remarkably like the things said about Magnus Carlsen by Korchnoi (amongst others). Speaking from my own lowly experience; against stronger opponents you always 'somehow' make a mistake. Similarly, playing against an engine will show you you always make a mistake

Premium Chessgames Member

click for larger view

White to move

1) -1.15 (24 ply) 26.Rxd1 Kh7 27.Qh4+ Bh6 28.Rxd4 Kg7 29.b4 Nd7 30.Rc4 Be3+ 31.Kh2 Bb6 32.a4 Nf6 33.a5 Bd8 34.Qd4 Re5 35.Qd3 Rb8 36.Qd4 b6 37.Rc6 Rxd5 38.Qe3 Rb7 39.Rc8 Re5 40.Qc3 Rd7 41.axb6 axb6 42.Kg1 b5 43.Qd4 Kh7 44.Qd3 Bb6+ 45.Kh2

2) -3.31 (24 ply) 26.Qxg6 Bc2 27.Qxc2 d3 28.Qd1 Bxb2 29.Qh5 Bd4+ 30.Kh1 Rf8 31.Re1 Rf7 32.Qg6+ Bg7 33.Qg5 Raf8 34.Kh2 Rf5 35.Qg6 d2 36.Rd1 R5f6 37.Qg4 Rf2 38.a4 Re8 39.a5 Ree2 40.Kg1 Rxg2+ 41.Qxg2 Rxg2+ 42.Kxg2

3) -7.90 (23 ply) 26.b4 Be2 27.Rc1 Nd3 28.Rc7 Bh5 29.Re7 Be5 30.g3 Rxe7 31.Qxe7 Bxg3 32.Qe6+ Kg7 33.Qe7+ Kh6 34.Kg2 Be5 35.h4 Nf4+ 36.Kg1 Bf3 37.Qg5+ Kh7 38.Qe7+ Kg8 39.h5 gxh5 40.Qxb7 Bxd5 41.Qa6 Ne6 42.Kf2 Rf8+ 43.Ke2

1.0 minute analysis by Stockfish 9 v010218

= = =

Just wondered why not <26.Rxd1>. I seems I wasn't mistaken.

Jun-27-18  ughaibu: Keypusher!
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <ughaibu> Soltis gives 21....Ba4 an exclamation point and writes: <After 21....Nxd3 22.Rxd3 Bb5 White again has 23.Rb3. But 23....Qc5 24.Rc1 Qxd5 25.Rc7 comes up short (23....Rac8 24.Rxg7+ Kxg7 25.Bf6+ Kg8).

Black's choice is simpler and contains less chance of oversight. The point of 21....Ba4 is to provoke 22.b3 so he can play 22....Nxd3 23.Rxd3 Bb5 and there is no Rb3. Equally bad is 22.Rd2 because of 22....Nxd3 23.Rxd3 Bc2! Rd2 d3+.>

Stockfish prefers 21....Nxd3 22.Rxd3 Bb5 23.Rb3 d3+ 24.Kh2 Qc5 (-0.90 at 40/62).

SF finds an amazing refutation to Lasker's 21....Ba4 idea: 22.b3 Nxd3 23.Bh6!! Bxh6 (after 23....Nc5 24.Bxg7 Kxg7 25.Ng5 h5 26.Rf7+ Kg8 27.Qf4 Black has no defense) 24.Qxh6 Bb5 25.Ng5 Re7 26.Nxh7 leading to a perpetual check. It follows that Tarrasch and Soltis are both wrong about 22.Bxg6 (Soltis writes: <White might as well roll the dice.>).

As always, the moral is: even if you're a grandmaster, annotating without an engine is malpractice.

Jul-13-18  ughaibu: Great! Thanks.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Old Indian Def. (A53) 0-1Notes by Dr. Tarrasch; like witchcraft
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by trh6upsz
Old Indian Def. (A53) 0-1Notes by Dr. Tarrasch; like witchcraft
from Fs, f4s, f5s & f7s for Old Timey Fredthebear Fun by fredthebear
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
Old Indian Def. (A53) 0-1Notes by Dr. Tarrasch; like witchcraft
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
Old Indian Def. (A53) 0-1Notes by Dr. Tarrasch; like witchcraft
from Deep Six Defenses to the Bottom of the Sea by fredthebear
Final Round 5 May 15th
from St Petersburg 1914 by Benzol
"...almost like witchcraft..."
from Having Fun with the Old Indian (and The Rat) by yiotta
Game #20
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
Lasker's "Witchcraft" Game
from Nimzophile's favorite games: OID-A53 by Nimzophile
venderbest's black
by venderbest
Old Indian Defense - A53-55
by johnarleyburns
Game 67
from Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
Game #20
from JNCC Games by pqmatagi

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC