chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Geir Ivar Henriksen vs Hans Arild Runde
NOR Team Champ , Open (2005), Moss, Oslo, rd 4, May-07
Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation (E12)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 24 more games of G Henriksen
sac: 40...b5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: This is "Medium/Easy/"? Maybe if you're Rybka! It took me 15 minutes or so to come up with 45...Nc5+! and now:

46.Kb2 bxc3+! and wins the queen with a knight fork;

46.Kc4 Qe4+! 47.Qd4 Bf7+! 48.Kb5 Qc6+ 49.Kxa5 Qa4#.

Apr-18-12  PinnedPiece: Wow great finish!

I have so wanted to ask this question and now seems like an excellent opportunity.

<frogbert> you have looked at these puzzles over the years and have a sense of their increasing difficulty M-S, right?

When you were ACTUALLY PLAYING this game, at move 45....if you can recall your thoughts and feelings from the actual game....when you played the knight move....

Did it seem to be a "medium-easy" decision at that time? (compared to NOW: OUR knowledge that THIS IS A PUZZLE and WE CAN SOLVE IT BECAUSE it is medium easy).

Hope my question makes sense. No time to elaborate if not.

Thx for any reply.

.

Apr-18-12  cyclon: 45. -Nc5+ 46. Kc4 ( Kb2 bxc3+ 47. Kxc3 Ne4+/Qxc3 Na4+ both winning Queen ) -Qe4+ 47. Qd4 Bf7+ 48. Kb5 ( you're welcome! ) -Qc6+ 49. Kxa5 Qb6X.
Apr-18-12  Blunderdome: frog, do you remember what the time control was here?
Apr-18-12  BadKnight: this puzzle is too difficult for a wednesday. usually i can guess right ideas/lines for monday-tuesday-wednesday puzzles in a minute or two, followed by 5-10 minute of calculations and verifications, but this one took me a long time to find Nc5+, because all other alternatives looked tempting but did not seem to work..i will not bore you all with lines but i thought Nc5+ had to be the move becuause others were not working. but then i missed the proper follow up coz i did not have spend enough time to solve it, as soon as i thought Nc5+ seemed to be the move, i went to the gamescore to see the exact solution.
Apr-18-12  whiteshark: Patzer sees check, patzer gives check. With wide open eyes he realizes it's winning.
Apr-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Dink coble 45.nc5 king stuck in knight fork fish around in e4 rightly picks up queen long boat drift in black king rub off boot a circle in much ado grit natural successor bet ring old scoop i giddy on c5 in kb2

then bxc3+ 47.kxc3 ne4 haul back it just a fraction of friction 46.kc4 qe4 and mate rinse it her d4 patch i now open in shut bring b7 feeling

the weight soon animals pour in 49.kxa5 qb6 on high waver minutae fold over clinks in chain bend age fan behind in try it cab off dence

thicket damn clams it hope in muscle the king bet 45.cxb4 decked out axb4 level crown then kingb3 a bin once bid for knight desist forages i

gauges in keel bad king retreat allowing: c5 esconce in black smoke pawn c3 ping having ne4 eg guess it was faith in kingb3 less crowned off.

Apr-18-12  ChessStalker: <LTJ> ¿why not plainly admitting you missed the complete winning line today? I think you can survive a 0 point score on a Wednesday.

CS

Apr-18-12  M.Hassan: <sevenseaman:But I call it only a 'chess typo'>

Your personal descency and impressive online manners calls it "chess typo", but it is infact recklessness and a kind of inaccuracy that should not have been displayed by a chess player. Anyways, the start of ones progress is to recognize ones faults! One more thank to you for mentioning and bringing this up.

Apr-18-12  LoveThatJoker: <ChessStalker> I already admitted to not having typed in what occurs after 45...Nc5+ 46. Kc4 in my original post. Your comment of giving myself a zero for not having typed that in - after having clearly typed the main idea of 45...Nc5+ and the other main half of the puzzle - is both ludicrous and unfair to the hard work I put into the puzzle COUPLED with the clear correctness of my answer. Therefore, whether you like it or not, my original score of 0.6 out of 1 for today stands.

You have kibitzed twice here on CG and both of them have been directed at me...keep it coming! :D

LTJ

Apr-18-12  frogbert: <Patzer sees check, patzer gives check. With wide open eyes he realizes it's winning.>

thanks, that's gracious of you. :o)

Apr-18-12  frogbert: <frog, do you remember what the time control was here?>

no i didn't remember, blunderdome, but due to my habit of jotting down time spent for each move, i found that it was played at 2h/40 moves followed by 1h to complete the game. that is, after i managed to dig up the score sheet from nearly 7 years ago.

and while i played the first 11 moves in 7 minutes, i managed to spend an *insane* 48 minutes on my 15th move, leaving only 40 minutes for the remaining 25. by move 30 i only had 4 minutes left, and when i blundered the game with 33. Qh1 i had less than one (1) minute left. i somehow managed to notice that i had 20 seconds left after move 36 - which probably explains why i blundered the exchange, but not why my opponent played Bd5-f3-d1-c2 to capture on g6 when Bd5-f3-h5 was slightly more efficient. but after move 33 he was in almost equally ridiculous time trouble as i was... :o)

Apr-18-12  BOSTER: <James D Flynn> <does black have a forced mate? 45...Qe6+ c4 (not Kc2 Qxh2#)>.

After 45...Qe6+ Kc2 Qxh2 Kxe3 and white win.

Apr-18-12  Jambow: Nice game <frog> I was looking at a4+ for a good while.
Apr-18-12  frogbert: <you have looked at these puzzles over the years and have a sense of their increasing difficulty M-S, right?

When you were ACTUALLY PLAYING this game, at move 45....if you can recall your thoughts and feelings from the actual game....when you played the knight move....

Did it seem to be a "medium-easy" decision at that time? >

good question, pinned piece!

first, it's always easy to think a combination is easier and more straight-forward than what it actually is once you know the solution. while it's chessgames.com that decides on the difficulty level of the puzzles, my initial thought was that this was possibly of tuesday/wednesday difficulty. in hindsight maybe wednesday/thursday would be more correct and possibly "medium" more descriptive than "medium/easy".

back to the game and when it was played: my opponent was a solid master-level player who has even played in the championship group of the norwegian championships once - in fact the first year magnus carlsen participated, in 2002 - after finishing top-2 in the master/"candidate" group in 2001. he spent an entire 20 minutes on 44. Rd1 after which i found nothing better than 44... b4+ to continue to pose problems for his slightly lose king. my notes say that i spent 5 minutes on that move, but i know i hadn't figured out the precise difference between white's two possible responses at that time (Kb3 or cxb4 first).

now, he didn't play the losing move 45. Kb3? very quickly. in fact, he spent a full 8 minutes on this move. for some reason i must have sensed that the position held some possibilities, and i assume that i simply started looking at forcing moves, which often is a good approach in tactical positions. i know that i considered 45... a4+ first, it being the most forcing alternative. i saw that i could win back the exchange after 46. Kc2 Nf2+ but the resulting position is far from convincing for black. "luckily" i didn't see 46... Nxf4! followed by 47... Qxg5 in the a4-line, because if i'd noticed that option, i might not have studied the position long enough to hit upon the right idea.

however, in the 45... a4+ line, i must have seen that 46. Kc4 leads to immediate mate, so i guess that made me consider 45... Nc5+ next. when i suddenly noticed that Kb2? loses to bxc3+! i got very excited, and i don't remember considering anything but 46... Qe4+ as follow up to 46. Qc4. however, i didn't see the *forced* mate - the line i calculated before playing 45... Nc5+ was 46. Kc4 (or i win the queen for a knight) Qe4+ 47. Qd4 (forced) Qe2+ 48. Rd3 (Qd3 wins the queen again, so...) 48... Qxa2+ mate. i remember thinking that "i can't move my bishop e8" because it would open b5 for the white king, which i guess is the reason why i didn't even consider the line leading to forced mate after 47... Bf7+.

once i'd seen the winning line with Qe4+ followed by Qe2+ i only double-checked my calculations a couple of times, not even trying to find something "better", as the line i was looking at was already clearly winning. it was my team mate im øystein hole who pointed out the forced mate the first time, when i set up the position for my team mates after the round (it was a team competition), asking them to solve the "puzzle". when i was shown 47... Bf7+ etc. my comment was "oh, i didn't see that at all - my plan was 47... Qe2+, winning the queen or mating!"

i spent a total of <11 minutes on my 45th move>, and i probably had a couple of confused thoughts that i can't recall now, but i was lucky to hit upon the right idea after maybe 3-5 minutes, after which i spent maybe another 5 minutes to see the 46. Kb2 cxb3+ "trick" and calculate a win (not the most forcing one) after 46. Kc4. my opponent only took two minutes to turn down the queen loss line and played Kc4, after which i simply went over my lines one more time and played Qe4+ after two more minutes of checking.

then i got up, knew i had won, looked at the position a couple of times, went a little back and forth, all while my opponent sat there nodding and shaking his head slightly. i returned to the board, sat down, and after a little more than 5 minutes my opponent simply wrote "0-1" on his score sheet, stopped the clock and offered his hand. which i remember to have found slightly disappointing, as i was eager to play out the combo.

so, to sum up: of course i was very lucky to win this game, and i was probably also a bit lucky to see the opportunity that suddenly was handed to me. another day i might have "found" another line first (like winning the g5-bishop) and become too tempted to play it to keep looking for alternatives. to my credit i'll say that i did calculate 45... Nc5+ to a win before i played the first move of the combo (Nc5+, Qe4+, Qe2+, Qxa2 mate), and i spent as much as 11 minutes (or "enough time") in the critical position. my rating at the time would be comparable to around 2050-2100 uscf i guess.

Apr-18-12  bischopper: hi. every one how are you today? with this how much time you need?
Apr-18-12  morfishine: I haven't seen this line: <45...a4+ 46.Kc2 Nxf4+ 47.Kb2 Qxg5> and Black has won a piece for an exchange; Now <48.Rf1?> is a mistake due to <48...Nd3+ 49.Kc2 b3+ 50.axb3 axb3+ 51.Kd1 Bh5+>


click for larger view

Nice Game <Frogbert>! I didn't know who you were

Apr-18-12  frogbert: <I haven't seen this line: <45...a4+ 46.Kc2 Nxf4+ 47.Kb2 Qxg5>>

morfishine, i posted that line earlier today - i (luckily) didn't see it during the game, though. and as i wrote, it "only" leads to an equal game for black with correct play.

<I didn't know who you were>

oh, i was someone else in 2005. ;o)

Apr-18-12  JG27Pyth: Wednesday? WEDNESDAY? *grumble* don't get me wrong it's a wonderful combination... but cg has turned up the heat a bit if this is a wednesday -- so many tantalizing forcing lines to consider... and I examined Nc5+ rather a lot without coming close to seeing that Kc4 was forced. the Kb2 Na4+ continuation was for some reason irresistible.
Apr-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I am usually on the other side of this, but I thought this was a really easy Wednesday.
Apr-18-12  TheBish: G Henriksen vs H Runde, 2005

Black to play (45...?) "Medium/Easy", Black is down an exchange and a pawn.

This position looks familiar, but it took me a few minutes to solve it, so I didn't remember it very well, if I should have! Maybe because I was stuck on 45...Ba4+, which was probably the key in a similar puzzle. But that move doesn't work here: 45...Ba4+ 46. Kxa4 (46. Kc4?? Qe4#) Nc5+ 47. Kb5 Qe8+ 48. Kc4 and Black's attack runs out of gas.

45...Nc5+ 46. Kc4

Or 46. Kb2 bxc3+! and a knight fork wins the queen after either 47. Qxc3 Na4+ or 47. Kxc3 Ne4+.

46...Qe4+ 47. Qd4 Bf7+ 48. Kb5 Qc6#.

Very instructive position.

Apr-18-12  dark.horse: For me, the problem with today's problem was the large number of candidates at every move; it took me a long time to filter through all of them. <gofer> shows a reduced position showing the essential tactical pattern (N + P vs K + Q and the forking motifs).
Apr-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  numbersguy70: <BadKnight: this puzzle is .........i will not bore you all with lines>

Others on this board would do well to take a lesson from you. Cheers.

Apr-19-12  morfishine: <frogbert> Thanks for the followup: I checked the posts to avoid duplicating...must be getting old
Apr-20-12  SuperPatzer77: <TheBish 46...Qe4+ 47. Qd4 Bf7+! 48. Kb5 Qc6#>

<TheBish> 48...Qc6+ is not a mate - 48...Qc6+, 49. Kxa5 (you overlook) Qb6# or Qa4#

Don't worry about your mistake, <TheBish> - we can figure it out that easy.

SuperPatzer77

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC