chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Raymond Keene vs Francisco Sanz Alonso
"Long Live the Keene!" (game of the day Sep-09-2022)
Alicante (1975), Alicante ESP, rd 11, Dec-??
King's Indian Defense: Normal. King's Knight Variation (E60)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Raymond Keene.      [405 more games annotated by Keene]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Keene/F Sanz Alonso games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: I understand that old theory was that the defender should head for a "fortress" with ♘g7, yet computers showed that this could be broken. From what IMlday says, it was still by far the strongest resistance.

Quite an elegant demonstration of the long-range power of the criss-crossing ♗s, I suppose with 101... ♘e7+ 102. ♔h7 ♘ any 103. ♗a3+ ♘e7 104. ♔h6 forcing ... ♔g8 losing the ♘.

Mar-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: Bent Larsen explained this ending to me in 1968 as a draw because of the 50-move rule and the N/g7, K/f6 extra obstinate as the light-squared ♗ is cramped off the e8-h5 diagonal. If d9 or i4 were available squares then progress would be faster.
Mar-28-09  AnalyzeThis: It would have been a draw because I don't think that there were extensions to the 50 move rule then, were there? If he couldn't see how you could win in 50 moves he was right. I guess there are ways to win a longer time period. Me, I'll go to my grave not having taking the time to figure this one out.
Mar-29-09  Benzol: This ending has cropped up more often than I realized.

Endgame Explorer: N vs BB

Oct-22-09  Manic: While the ending was well played by white, 63...Bd5?? seems to indicate black's endgame knowledge is quite poor. Almost anyone would straight away trade off for the wrong-colour bishop ending. If white's king blocks black's king from the corner the knight can always stop the advance of the pawn.
Dec-04-10  kevin86: From what I understand,BB vs n is a draw because any winning procedure would exceed the 50 move limit. It is however,the best possible winning chances in the two pieces vs one scanario. Funny,two knights cannot even force a win against a bear king-two against a piece and a king,an absolute suicide is necessary for the one piece player to lose. Here is a joke position :


click for larger view

Feb-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Two bishops versus a knight was thought to be a theoretical draw until computers proved otherwise c. 1990. It is often possible (at least in theory) to win the ending within 50 moves. Even in practice, the superior side has often succeeded in winning - 10 wins out of 19 games in CG.com's database. Endgame Explorer: BB vs N As IM Day indicated, the correct defense is to plant your knight on one of the fianchetto squares (b2, g2, b7, g7) and hover around the outside of it with your king - for example, N on b7, king moving between b6 and c7. If your opponent breaks down that semi-fortress, pack your bags and head down the board to another fianchetto square. P Popovic vs Korchnoi, 1984 is a good example of successful defense. Play it out from move 70 on.
Feb-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  mistermac: This is an ending which I have played around with for years. I never knew the improbable situation had cropped up until <perfidious> pointed it out today on my forum.

To study it is of academic interest rather than practical, but perhaps it would yield an insight ito how the pieces co-operate when there is sparse extra material, especially a pawn or two.

Any ideas, apart from comment here, as to how to go about completing the task in hand, whether assurance of a draw for N side, or win for BB side of argument?

A little more complicated than mate with BN vs zilch.

Jun-08-13  tbentley: 93...Nd6 is theoretically mate in 51, while 93...Kg7 is mate in 28.
Sep-09-22  areknames: I was expecting this pun (or variation), the unkown was of course what game would be picked. At first glance, not a bad choice.
Sep-09-22  Brenin: I would have preferred a game won with an active Q, rather than one where the Qs disappear in the opening..
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: It's after all a King's Indian, King's Knight Variation.
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Seems to be a royals reference...
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: A most timely pun. <Brenin> Indeed, if it was intended as a metaphor that the Qs disappear, they should have stayed much longer on the board.

I had to look why Black resigned, here it is for other patzers:
101...Ke7 102.Kg7 wins the N.
101...Ke8 102.Kg7+ and 103.Kxg8.
101...Ne7+ 102.Kh7 Nmoves 103.Ba3+ Ne7 (forced) 104.Kh6 Kg8 105.Bxe7. Or 102.Kh6 Nmoves 103.Ba3+ Ne7 104.B on a3 moves on the diagonal (not Kh7?? stalemate).

Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Long to Rayne over us.
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: Who died and made this an appropriate pun?
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajk68: At move 36 white has a dominant position! Space, bishop pair, pawn structure.

If black calculated move 33, he did so quite poorly. The subsequent exchanges leave black much worse off.

And by move 41, white is even more dominant. Black's pawn structure is shattered.

63...Bd5?? , Bxa4 is clearly the right move. This removes the bishop which will control the queening square.

Sep-09-22  goodevans: <FSR: [...] As IM Day indicated, the correct defense is to plant your knight on one of the fianchetto squares...>

Ray Keene clearly knew this, hence his comment to Black's 86th move (which I didn't understand until I read <FSR>'s post).

Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: Thanks / such long games don’t often get published.
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: Personally I love playing over such games, and the longer the better!

Ray, this is a bit of a long shot, but do you by any chance remember what round this game was played in?

Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: Yes it was memorably the last round and everyone ( apart from Pomar who had clearly won first prize) had to wait till way past midnight for their prizes since this game affected all positions from second downwards.
Sep-09-22  Cheapo by the Dozen: Given how long Black's king survived, I find the pun to be very good, all timeliness concerns even aside.
Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: Thanks Ray, good to hear from the horse's mouth, as it were.

A crosstable can be seen here, for those interested:-

https://www.belgianchesshistory.be/...

Sep-09-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Teyss: Hi Ray, thanks for posting here and for your insight on the game. Impressive endgame technique; with this and <FSR>'s helpful comment I learned something about N vs 2Bs.

Sincere condolences for the loss affecting your country. The Queen was respected worldwide and rightfully even more so in Britain. May she rest in peace.

Sep-28-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <FSR> <As IM Day indicated, the correct defense is to plant your knight on one of the fianchetto squares (b2, g2, b7, g7) and hover around the outside of it with your king - for example, N on b7, king moving between b6 and c7. If your opponent breaks down that semi-fortress, pack your bags and head down the board to another fianchetto square. P Popovic vs Korchnoi, 1984 is a good example of successful defense. Play it out from move 70 on.>

Great to know this, <FSR>. I just played over the game you suggested. Great defense lesson from Korchnoi.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC