chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Piet Peelen vs Jorden van Foreest
"Peelen Good" (game of the day Mar-19-2019)
15th Unive Open (2011), Hoogeveen NED, rd 3, Oct-16
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Rubinstein Attack (D64)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,736 more games of J van Foreest
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-11-19  bubuli55: Peelen Good
Mar-19-19  OrangeTulip: Jorden was 11 in 2011. Two years ago I saw on Dutch telly a documentary about the family. Almost all children are playing chess in a fanatic way, but by the the most fanatic was Jorden of course. The pun is to profound for me... American associations, I guess
Mar-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Just a takeoff on "Feelin' Good".
Mar-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <OhioChessFan: Just a takeoff on "Feelin' Good"> Perhaps Peelen Groovy might have been more evocative.
Mar-19-19  Ironmanth: Great fight down the stretch! Thanks, chessgames!
Mar-19-19  Gryz: <"the most fanatic was Jorden of course">.

Nope. Little Machteld is the most fanatic. She's gonna be World Champion one day. :) I'm sure of it.

Mar-19-19  thegoodanarchist: <offramp: <OhioChessFan: Just a takeoff on "Feelin' Good"> Perhaps Peelen Groovy might have been more evocative.> I am glad it isn't "Peelen Potatoes"
Mar-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sargon: <offramp: <OhioChessFan: Just a takeoff on "Feelin' Good"> Perhaps Peelen Groovy might have been more evocative.>

While the reference to the Chuck Mangione hit is nice, "Peelen Groovy" is also a quality pun. I'm not sure if it would qualify as an upgrade or not. All other things being equal, I tend to prefer the slightly more obscure offerings...

Mar-19-19  cormier:


click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4 d 22 dpa done

1. + / = (0.44): 12...Bb7 13.0-0 c5 14.Bxf6 Nxf6 15.dxc5 Bxc5 16.Rfd1 Qe7 17.Nxb5 Bxe3 18.fxe3 axb5 19.Bxb5 Rec8 20.Qe2 Be4 21.Nd4 Nd5 22.Bc6 Rab8 23.Bxd5 Bxd5 24.e4 Rxc1 25.Rxc1 Qg5 26.Re1 Ba8 27.b4 Rd8 28.Nf3

and d 21 dpa done 2. + / = (0.65): 12...h6 13.Bxf6 gxf6 14.0-0 Bb7 15.Ne4 f5 16.Nc5 Nxc5 17.dxc5 Qc7 18.Rfe1 Rad8 19.b4 Bc8 20.Rcd1 Bf6 21.e4 fxe4 22.Bxe4 Bg7 23.Bh7+ Kf8 24.h3 Rxd1 25.Rxd1 Bd7 26.Rd6 Rd8 27.Qd3 Bf6 28.Be4

Mar-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Peelen (is) Good seems accurate. Peelen (is) Groovy not so much.
Mar-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 12...Bb7 is obligatory before playing c6-c5 in this position. If white plays 13.0-0, then 13...h6 is too slow, as white can fix simply Pc6 by 14.Bxf6 Nxf6 15.b4! or 15.Ne4!?, which was played in Alatortsev vs I Rabinovich, 1932
Mar-19-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 35...f4? drops a Pawn for nothing while after 35...Rc1! 36.Bb3 Kg7 37.Ke2 Kf6 it is not clear to me how white is going to win it.

Of course, white should have played 30.Rb1 at first avoiding all that mess with advanced b-Pawn. Pe6 cannot escape his doom as 30.Rb1 Rc6 is followed by simple 31.Nd4 forking the Rook and the Pawn on e6.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC