Sally Simpson: ***
Hi Cibator,
So CHESS covered this as well (what issue - the game took place in 1967 but I'm reading it from a 1975 BCM ).
The report is from 'Quotes and Queries' (no.3564) page 114.
It mentions the controller was M.Yudovitch and clearly says:
'Barczay would only continue if the N on K5 went there. (losing a piece for White). Watzka resigned without continuing."
(BCM back then used descriptive notation.)
It then says see BCM March 1967 (page 71) which I do not have to hand at the moment.
I thought any ambiguous sealed move lost a game, maybe in this case Barczay was giving his opponent a sporting chance rather than see him defaulted.
As the game linked above suggests 41. Ne5-g4 is given and then 1-0.
Without more details at the moment it looks like the controller allowed the move 41.Ne5-g4 and Watzka declined to continue.
I've submitted the game for inclusion here. Hopefully we can sort out what happened on it's own game page.
Thanks again for heads up about CHESS.
***