|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 167 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Sep-08-20 | | Big Pawn: <Troller: In modern society, the existence of homosexuals does not impede anyone's life (at least no more than other groups), so there are no objective reasons for the aversion - correct me if I'm wrong.> Homosexuality kills more people than Muslim terrorists. It spreads disease throughout society. All previous cultures that went homo soon fell due to moral degeneracy. Homosexuals know what they are doing isn't right, so they have massive guilt complexes and they kill themselves at alarming rates comparatively speaking. To say it does no harm is, therefore, denial. But let's put all of that aside and pretend I didn't write the above paragraph. Is the requirement of "impeding" someone really what it's all about? Let's consider this case: Do you object to a father sodomizing his willing adult age son? Would you march in a PRIDE parade dedicated exclusively to that? Would you be against the normalization of father on son sex? Or would you say, "Well, they aren't "impeding" me so I don't care." ? If you are against that, then it shows that your criteria (are they impeding someone) is insufficient and erroneous. |
|
| Sep-08-20 | | Big Pawn: <Troller: If one lives in an environment where homosexuality is considered a sign of weakness, then one will naturally be afraid to turn out to be one.> You used the word afraid again, but you haven't justified the use of that word yet. |
|
| Sep-08-20 | | Big Pawn: <tga: In fact, the evidence available indicates the indoctrination really only goes the other way. People are taught <not> to have an aversion, and it is a rather recent phenomenon. > Correct.
<It is normal in nature for homosexuality to be viewed negatively. It is only in advanced Western countries where the propaganda campaigns have made enough inroads into brainwashing people, where homosexuality is actually tolerated under the law. And yet it is still reviled by many in those countries.> Well said once again. This is obvious.
<A few years ago there was a TV show about two White men (from England, IIRC) going to a jungle in South America to live with a primitive tribe of hunter-gatherers.Once the chief was persuaded to let them live with the tribe, he tried to give them women (for sex), because (as one of the natives remarked) men need sex everyday. One of the English dudes was married, and they both declined the offer of women. The chief became suspicious that they might be homosexuals, and informed them it was prohibited, and they would be expelled from the tribe if they engaged in homosexuality.> I saw that! The chief told them that if he found out they were having sex together in their tent, he would shove a hot pepper up their asses. That was back about 2007. |
|
Sep-08-20
 | | OhioChessFan: <Antifa rioter sets his own feet on fire: > Hilarious. Why'd the cop help put it out? |
|
| Sep-08-20 | | Everett: <TGA> thanks for considering reading of the Reason article. It’s an old one, but figured the topics were appropriate to mention. |
|
| Sep-08-20 | | Everett: <TGA> and btw, I basically agree with you. When one realizes that there is a rational, human reason to own a gun, especially when further away from a police station, then it makes perfect sense for every one to carry if the police stand down while criminals walk the streets. I’m a father, in a city that “prevents” me from having a gun. I’ve made some preparations for the coming election (no matter who “wins”) and beyond. And <BP>, you’re exactly right, re: civilians taking it upon themselves to defend their families and property. We and they have every right to. |
|
| Sep-08-20 | | Everett: < Big Pawn: <Troller: If one lives in an environment where homosexuality is considered a sign of weakness, then one will naturally be afraid to turn out to be one.>
You used the word afraid again, but you haven't justified the use of that word yet.> Actually, this is implied by one or two logical steps. The weak are naturally more vulnerable than the strong. To be considered weak will likely mean that you and others will view you as more vulnerable, and easier target for some sort of malevolence. Thus fearing vulnerability and weakness itself seems quite natural. Here’s another way to look at it re: guns. A house defended by a trained and armed family is not weak, and thus has no more than the natural concern one would have if someone threatened the the family’s house and property. An unarmed family in such circumstances would likely, naturally, feel a bit more fear, being in a weaker position to defend the family members and the property itself. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | optimal play: <It would be 'an insult' if Harris became the first US woman president: Trump> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTN...
It's funny when Trump pronounces "Kamala"" |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | optimal play: <Pregnant Australian Mom Arrested for Facebook Post> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7L...
This has now reached PragerU!
Good video.
Except in Australia she's not a "mom", she's a "mum". Otherwise a pertinent example introducing a timely warning. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | Big Pawn: This is the best thing I've seen in a very long time. I watched the whole series in two nights. https://youtu.be/Vyv1W-hsmx8?list=P... |
|
Sep-09-20
 | | Troller: <It is normal in nature for homosexuality to be viewed negatively. It is only in advanced Western countries where the propaganda campaigns have made enough inroads into brainwashing people, where homosexuality is actually tolerated under the law. And yet it is still reviled by many in those countries> Ancient Greece? Renaissance North Italy? Mesopotamia? Have you ever studied the subject at all? <An unarmed family in such circumstances would likely, naturally, feel a bit more fear, being in a weaker position to defend the family members and the property itself.> Or, if you are afraid, you will acquire guns, whereas if you are not afraid, you do not need to? |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <I saw that! The chief told them that if he found out they were having sex together in their tent, he would shove a hot pepper up their asses. > LOL, I forgot that part. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < OhioChessFan: <Antifa rioter sets his own feet on fire: > Hilarious. Why'd the cop help put it out?> Maybe to avoid getting fired :) |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <Everett: ...I’ve made some preparations for the coming election (no matter who “wins”) and beyond.> Very wise. Were I live I think we've got time. We may even not have any problems, but I'm still armed. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <Troller: <<<It is normal in nature for homosexuality to be viewed negatively. It is only in advanced Western countries where the propaganda campaigns have made enough inroads into brainwashing people, where homosexuality is actually tolerated under the law. And yet it is still reviled by many in those countries>>> Ancient Greece? Renaissance North Italy?> Sounds like advanced Western countries to me. They were advanced for their time. <Have you ever studied the subject at all?> No, of course not. That's disgusting. Why would I study perversion? I am a decent human being. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < Troller:
Or, if you are afraid, you will acquire guns, whereas if you are not afraid, you do not need to?> There is a vast difference between fear and preparation. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | Big Pawn: <Actually, this is implied by one or two logical steps. The weak are naturally more vulnerable than the strong. To be considered weak will likely mean that you and others will view you as more vulnerable, and easier target for some sort of malevolence. Thus fearing vulnerability and weakness itself seems quite natural. > Doesn't follow logically.
One may be weak but unafraid. If you can prove that to be incorrect, then I will concede the point. But <Troller> said, initially, that one <must> be fearful of homosexuals to find them disgusting. Now he's backed off from that. I don't want to lift my toilet seat up and lick what's underneath it, even if it were a fact that I would not get sick from doing that, because I think it's disgusting. I do not fear the toilet seat, but I do find the idea of licking it to be disgusting. Same thing with homosexuality. I do not fear them or it, but rightly find it disgusting. Some things really are detestable. |
|
| Sep-09-20 | | Big Pawn: If you don't want to pick up a fresh hot turd with your bare hands, it is because you find it <disgusting>, not because you are afraid of the turd. <Straight men’s physiological stress response to seeing two men kissing is the same as seeing maggots> https://www.psypost.org/2017/06/str... It's gross, not <scary>. |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | Jambow: Yeah thanks <Big Pawn> the term homophobic has been nonsensical since first added to the ever muddled always confused liberal lexicon. Disgust and fear are NOT synonymous terms if you look up either disgust or fear they do NOT show up on the list of synonyms for the other. You would think for any rational person that would pretty much settle it but not so with the left which constantly redefines everything to suit what ever their outrage of the moment is. I work with I communicate with and treat with respect homosexuals every day. I do not wan't to hear about their perverted exploits as they nauseate me. I don't hide, shake or run away in fear??? I guess it is like ANTIFA being blatant fascist like everything they do what they accuse others of they are always the most guilty of themselves. It is if they seek to be in hypocritical contradiction in all points at all times... Welcome to 2020. |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < I do not wan't to hear about their perverted exploits as they nauseate me> I agree and have quit restaurants because they have fag bartenders/ waitresses. But since when is "want" a contraction? |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | Everett: <Troller>
<Or if you are afraid, you will acquire guns, whereas if you are not afraid, you do not need to?> People die from drowning all the time because they lack respect and appropriate fear of the ocean. So one can need protection (or flotation devices, or stay on land) without attaining it. I’m sure many people have died before realizing they were about to, and after they failed to protect themselves because they felt no, or not enough, fear to act proactively. |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | Everett: <Jambow> Disgust and fear are not synonymous. Yet they seem quite related, as they both are strongly negative, and usually make us move away from, push away from, or flee from whatever is causing it. Avoidance of negative feelings is a general human trait. Fear and disgust fall in to that category. |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <Everett: <Jambow> Disgust and fear are not synonymous. Yet they seem quite related, as they both are strongly negative, and usually make us move away from, push away from, or flee from whatever is causing it. Avoidance of negative feelings is a general human trait. Fear and disgust fall in to that category.> This doesn't explain why the Left changes the wording, from disgust to homophobia. |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | diceman: <Everett:
Avoidance of negative feelings is a general human trait. Fear and disgust fall in to that category.> Fear is about danger. |
|
| Sep-10-20 | | diceman: Damani Felder Explains Democratic Party Racial Politics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq0... |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 167 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
