He's ahead when you consider he doesn't have the same America, Media, or Congress.>

Way ahead of Reagan, when you consider Reagan sold us out on immigration.

Thoughts?>

Lols

We don't need to have an election in November.>

We can probably agree to that when we split the country in two.

Reagan was mediocre to poor. He is way overrated by conservatives.>

I can't give the people, politicians, or media, a 31 year pass.

<way overrated by conservatives.>

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3...

That's insane!

It's like a Beatle's concert. Total rockstar status. Biden got 10 people at one of his events the other day and Trump is getting this.

It's like 2016 but even more so.

It's clear that Trump is the people's champion and now, after four years of rather astonishing success, he's <really> the people's champion.

Trump could lay claim to the executive office indefinitely and the people would support him I think. He could lead a national clean up, shall we call it, and restore America back to its real self, which includes, most importantly, resurrecting the real American society as we all knew it growing up, and as our forefathers knew it.

This <NEW American Society> or culture is not American at all. This X-rated, Marxist culture is the product of a process known as Culture Creation. It's not organic. It's not grassroots. It's not genuine.

America is not an X-Rated society. American society is not:

Sodomy
Abortion
Divorce

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbs...

A little over 43 minutes in, the President, Donald Trump, said that the hardest part about running the country is dealing with crazy democrats!!!! LOL

Very good summary.

I can't give the people, politicians, or media, a 31 year pass.>

Neither can I.

<<<<way overrated by conservatives.>>>

I assume that's before you were one?>

Fair question, for sure.

First of all, I started out my adult life (meaning my "voting"life) as a so-called "conservative". My bad! Apologies. In the late 1990s, I swung Dem. OMG, what a mistake.

To my own defense, I was a naive 18 year-old when I got into politics. The two big swings from side to side? Topic for another time.

But remember, the "Conservative" Right has failed completely. They've never conserved one damn principle of US culture.

Prayer in school? Lost in 1963.
No Abortion allowed? Defeated in 1972
Freedom of Association? We can't even talk about it ever since the SCOTUS ordered forced bussing.
Gay Marriage? Surrendered during (before?!) the Obama Admin.
Couldn't even get a lyrics warning label, even with the Lib Tipper Gore on their side.

If we split, it needs to be done right.

Slavery is not wrong. On atheism, it may be your opinion that slavery is wrong, but since there are no moral facts, it is just your opinion. The man who says slavery is a just and fine thing is on equal moral footing with you.

Throwing homosexuals off of rooftops, as is the way in many Islamic countries, is a fine thing. You may think it is immoral, but you are not correct because "correct" isn't an option when dealing with opinions.

Therefore, the atheist can never condemn any alleged immoral action as being really wrong, objectively wrong, or wrong in some such factual way. All he can do is express his disagreement.

However, the theist does not live in that world. In the theist's world, some things really are right and wrong, moral facts exist because objective moral values do exist. The theist's worldview allows him to condemn what is wrong and <not> merely be giving his opinion on the matter.

The point is that theistic worldview has a way to account for moral facts while the atheistic worldview does not.

Next time you hear a godless lib condemning Trump for saying this or doing that and then pronounce a moral judgment upon him, you can rightly call that lib a hypocrite. For he, on his worldview, invents his own little morality and then has the arrogance to project that morality onto the world and hold it in judgment as if he himself is God.

The theist does not do that, because he can't. It's impossible. On the theist's worldview, noone invents his own morality because morality belongs exclusively to God.

That's a beginner's problem

'Objective moral values do not exist on the atheist worldview. What are the logical consequences of this?'

The logical consequence is as follows:

When (like you assume lenghly) this atheist wordview exists, there can't exist objective moral values in the first place .

That's what I said.

<Big Pawn: Objective moral values do not exist on the atheist worldview. >

Restating what I said is <not> a logical consequence of any kind.

You've not added anything to the narrative.

Since you have problems comprehending your own revolutionary contradiction, let me graciously fill the blanks for posterity:

'When (like you assume lenghly) this atheist wordview exists, there can't exist objective moral values [in your non atheistic worldview, that must by definition be in existance at the same time; an atheist worldview is inevitably in the definition of its opposite counterpart] in the first place.'

You just came up, it seems by your reaction by sheer luck with the final counter argument why OMV cannot exist anywhere wherever there are things in existance (~ your head). Do you grasp the extensive consequence made by your offhand remark better now?

Before we continue with your 'kindly' offered change of topic to the logically unrelated 'You seem hopelessly confused already. Are you an atheist?' we should take note, that after years of fundamentally interesting 'research' on OVM you of all ppl have been able to refute it without even being aware in the slightest.

With that late discovery my friend Big Pawn you did your name great justice.

Cheese for the picture, please.

You know what is funny? That all the time the answer was waiting right there between your hemispheres, the only place on earth your endless argumentations seem to never have touched.

You just came up, it seems by your reaction by sheer luck with the final counter argument why OMV cannot exist anywhere wherever there are things in existance (~ your head). Do you grasp the extensive consequence made by your offhand remark better now?>

This is almost like <Chris Owen> level word salad.

You are agreeing with me that on atheism, objective moral values do not exist.

I'm glad you agree.

It's not just amnesty, but the porous southern border too. There was even an article about it in Time Magazine when Reagan was in office (back when the MSM wasn't all in on the "Let's Hate America!" agenda).

<What else?>

Reagan delivered for corporate interests and the military industrial complex, but never got around to doing anything for social conservatives, other than nominating Bork.

Who got Borked, of course.

Worst of all, though, and my reason number 1, is that Reagan normalized deficit spending during good economic times as well as bad.

And basically, that's why we have The Swamp. The old adage in the Imperial Capitol is that it's always boom times in Washington, D.C.

Recession? We need stimulus! (translation: We Need Deficit Spending.)

Economy great? No reduction in government spending! Even under Trump. (translation: We Need Deficit Spending.)

No layoffs, no elimination of departments, not even culling of the Deep State Bureaucrats.

Government never has to get efficient. Never has to clean out the dead wood. Un-elected petty officials run rampant in DC, and they see Trump as their enemy, the one who might (just might, small possibility) drain the Swamp, which means the incompetent boobs manning all the Federal Gov't. positions might have to try to find real jobs, for which no business owner in his right mind would hire them.

Reagan's approach to deficit spending is the main reason why our ruling class is able to wage war not only against Trump's base voters, but able to wage war against America itself.

Here's an analogy: California wildfires.

Why do we have them? Despite Lib lies to the contrary, they weren't caused by Trump, nor by global warming.

They were caused by Leftist Environmentalists fighting the clearing out of dead wood and underbrush. The tinder and fuel has been allowed to build up because sane people were thwarted from good stewardship of the forests. (I read a great article about this, just today. Unfortunately, I cannot find the link at the moment.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zbl...

1. Dealt poorly with illegals
2. Reagan deficit spent
3. Lack of social conservative policies

Is that an example of false modesty?>

Yes