|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 18 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Apr-07-16 | | TheFocus: <Jim> <But what are your comments about the Rogoff page if not insulting.> My comments reflect the truth. Look at the behaviour of the "liberals" there. I guess insults are their mode of conversation. Which speaks volumes about their intelligence. They may be "smart," but not intelligent. The <Rogoff> page itself is an insult to the site. <By the way, I have never had a ponytail or even long hair.> LOL! Okay, I won't call you Ponytail. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Jim Bartle: My behavior is fine. I am not going around insulting people, though I can be highly critical. What bothers me is you believe someone has "won" and someone has "lost" without any basis, either here or over there. Now there is one person on Rogoff who is little more than a string of insults with no substance whatsoever. He really isn't contributing anything positiv at all, and it's awkward to have him on "my" side. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | TheFocus: <Jim> <What bothers me is you believe someone has "won" and someone has "lost" without any basis, either here or over there.> Like you, I do know how to read what gets posted on the <Rogaine> page. It is clear who is winning and who is not. Denial is not just a river in Africa. <Who is not> would be you and your supporters. |
|
Apr-07-16
 | | OhioChessFan: <Now there is one person on Rogoff who is little more than a string of insults with no substance whatsoever. He really isn't contributing anything positiv at all, and it's awkward to have him on "my" side.> Yeah, but he's really a good chess player. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Jim Bartle: <focus> Well if you know who is winning perhaps you could explain it. By what argument am I losing? And by facts, logic, stuff like that. Not bullying and claims of victory. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Jim Bartle: <Yeah, but he's really a good chess player.> Not who I mean...but I guess you know that. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Big Pawn: <Jim: Now there is one person on Rogoff who is little more than a string of insults with no substance whatsoever. He really isn't contributing anything positiv at all, and it's awkward to have him on "my" side.> Jim, you can be a reasonable poster, but sometimes, like last night, you started to sound like him. Don't let him drag you down. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | TheFocus: <Jim Bartle> <focus> <Well if you know who is winning perhaps you could explain it. By what argument am I losing?> <Jim> Do you really think I will waste my time by posting all of that? How far back would you wish me to go? <Big Pawn> has kicked your butt so many times, it has become a sad joke. Now go away and play. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | TheFocus: Oh, and <Jim>. I think you missed a few specks of mud. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Big Pawn: <Jim Bartle: <Yeah, but he's really a good chess player.>
Not who I mean...but I guess you know that.> But <Ohio> makes a good point and he right, but I think you meant the other poster. There's a few. |
|
Apr-07-16
 | | WannaBe: <OCF: ...Yeah, but he's really a good chess player.> Are y'all talking about me or <AJ>!??! |
|
Apr-07-16
| | OhioChessFan: This may be the first time in cg.c history someone willingly compared themselves to AJ. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Jim Bartle: <<Jim> Do you really think I will waste my time by posting all of that? How far back would you wish me to go? <Big Pawn> has kicked your butt so many times, it has become a sad joke.> Show me one, then. Where he argued honestly and you believe he had the better arguments on the merits. One. |
|
| Apr-07-16 | | Big Pawn: Jim, I always debate honestly.
Always.
For you to try to weasel away by claiming I'm not being honest when I debate, is dishonest in itself. I quote you.
I number my points for reference.
I make sure we stay exactly on topic.
You sound like a sore loser when you make excuses like this. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Jim Bartle: When I post
<Yeah, the Alabama voter IDs were free...IF you could travel to where they were being given out.> and you quote it as
<Yeah, the Alabama voter IDs were free..> That is blatantly dishonest. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | diceman: <Jim Bartle:
<...IF you could travel to where they were being given out.>> The contempt, and condescension of the white, elitist, liberal. Makes you wonder how much less of a human Bartle thinks the black man is? |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | TheFocus: <dicaman> If <Jim> ever removes his foot from the Black man's neck, we could ask him. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Jim Bartle: Well, <focus>, maybe you could explain how I have my foot on the black man's neck. <diceman> and <ocf> have made that claim but have never explained how that is true in any vaguely coherent way. You are capable of writing coherently. Why not explain it to me? |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Big Pawn: <IDs were free...IF you could travel to where they were being given out.> and you quote it as
<Yeah, the Alabama voter IDs were free..> That is blatantly dishonest.>
This is what you have to show for my dishonesty?
I asked you if voter ID was FREE in Alabama.
You said it was and I quoted that.
Are you now saying that voter ID is *not* FREE?
Yes or no. Put up or shut up. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Jim Bartle: It's the most recent and most clearcut. Your quote is blatantly deceptive. If people quote that way all the time, nobody could write anything without it being twisted to appear to say what it doesn't. As far as being dishonest, two other examples:
You continue to claim Obama wants to bring in 200,000 Syrian refugees , while the number is clearly 10,000. Trump said "wages are too high" very clearly in a debate, yet you continue to deny it. It isn't that hard to admit a mistake and correct it. I did yesterday with the fathers and immediately corrected it and apologized. You apparently are incapable of doing that. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Jim Bartle: Remember this?
You were offered FREE tickets to a conference by Professor Craig. You admire his work and entrance was FREE.
So why didn't you go? |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Big Pawn: <I asked you if voter ID was FREE in Alabama. You said it was and I quoted that.
Are you now saying that voter ID is *not* FREE?
Yes or no. Put up or shut up.>
Answer the question. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | diceman: <Jim Bartle: Well, <focus>, maybe you could explain how I have my foot on the black man's neck. <diceman> and <ocf> have made that claim but have never explained how that is true in any vaguely coherent way.> Cowardly liar Bartle hides behind his ignorance and stupidity. Jim's last "safe" space. |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | Jim Bartle: I'll answer it if you answer about the Craig conference. Why didn't you go? The way you quoted me was dishonest. I might start doing the same with you... |
|
| Apr-08-16 | | diceman: <Jim Bartle: Remember this?
You were offered FREE tickets to a conference by Professor Craig. You admire his work and entrance was FREE.
So why didn't you go?>
Did he have to go to the Craig conference to be able to vote, dummy? Is he complaining he cant vote because he didn't go? |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 18 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
