|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 216 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jan-10-21 | | OhioLiberalFan: <George> if you're here, can you be careful about that bet? I'd hate for this site to lose a true liberal brother in arms. Maybe you could bet not posting for a month instead of forever. |
|
| Jan-10-21 | | George Wallace: <OhioLiberalFan: <George> if you're here, can you be careful about that bet? I'd hate for this site to lose a true liberal brother in arms. Maybe you could bet not posting for a month instead of forever.> Good point. It’s just that I marvel at his stupidity, arrogance and lack of self-awareness. I hope big pawn doesn’t delete this message! |
|
Jan-11-21
 | | OhioChessFan: <Mort's> current beatdown of of all our liberal friends is astounding, but ultimately pointless. They are all brazen, unrepentant liars, and simply don't care about the truth. They. Don't. Care. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | thegoodanarchist: <OhioChessFan: <tga> want to begin your issue 2?... OhioChessFan: <tga> I refer to this post: <<<2. Since <OCF> rejects <historical>, recorded eyewitness testimony, and this is the only possible evidence available to us if we want to <examine> and understand history, why does he repeatedly ask me to "prove" the historical record? After all, he automatically (and in advance!) rejects any and all possible historical evidence, other than scripture.>>>> Well, 3 thoughts come to mind.
1. That doesn't really strike me as a debate topic. It is merely my understanding of your position on history, and my question related to it. 2. We already moved past that post, in the discussion. Revisiting it would be tantamount to going backwards, IMO. 3. In my mind, sola scriptura [ss] was the central topic of the debate from day one, and I already wrapped up my closing argument about ss on Jan. 4th. Here it is: Big Pawn chessforum (kibitz #5501) I have moved on from ss, since I don't think there is anything else to say on it. So why don't you propose a topic? |
|
Jan-11-21
| | OhioChessFan: Continuing: 21-30, we've lost every one of them. Lost bad. Probably irrevocably. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | diceman: <OhioChessFan:
we've lost all those.>
"Surrendered" may be a better term.
"Lost" sounds like you were in the game and fighting. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | OhioLiberalFan: <George: I hope big pawn doesn’t delete this message!> Silly boy. It's us true liberals who are trying to quash free speech. <BP> is naive enough to think people should say what they want. As if THAT will help conservatives win the next election! ROTFLOL. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | diceman: Lt. General Thomas McInerney:
Special Forces Took Nancy Pelosi Laptop Wednesday, Says She's Frantic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2A...
TRUMP SIGNS INSURRECTION ACT GENERAL FLYNN TO BE APPOINTED VICE PRESIDENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrD... |
|
Jan-11-21
| | OhioChessFan: <tga: You obviously don't understand what Protestantism is. <There are only 3 options in Christianity.> Either you are in the Latin Church (RCC), the Orthodox Church, or you are a Protestant.> I challenge <tga> to defend his highlighted affirmation. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | diceman: Lt Gen Tom McInerney Must watch Everything explained! <Very important stuff our country is at stake. This is not some random figure this is a high ranking ex general from the vietnam day's.> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKw... |
|
Jan-11-21
 | | gezafan: <OhioLiberalFan: <George: I hope big pawn doesn’t delete this message!>
Silly boy. It's us true liberals who are trying to quash free speech. <BP> is naive enough to think people should say what they want. As if THAT will help conservatives win the next election! ROTFLOL.> Are you saying here that you don't support free speech? That it's "naive" to think that people should have freedom of speech? |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | thegoodanarchist: < OhioChessFan:
<<<tga: You obviously don't understand what Protestantism is. <There are only 3 options in Christianity.> Either you are in the Latin Church (RCC), the Orthodox Church, or you are a Protestant.>>> I challenge <tga> to defend his highlighted affirmation.> Heh.
Since you reject the historical record in advance, this challenge is tantamount to declaring yourself the victor in advance. If you want to have a discussion about the historic record, then you must <accept> the historic record to have the discussion. If you don't accept the historic record, then the discussion might as well be a recording of 2 children discussing their Unicorn herds, and the majick medallions all the Unicorns wear. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | thegoodanarchist: < gezafan:
<<OhioLiberalFan: <George: I hope big pawn doesn’t delete this message!> Silly boy. It's us true liberals who are trying to quash free speech. <BP> is naive enough to think people should say what they want. As if THAT will help conservatives win the next election! ROTFLOL.>> Are you saying here that you don't support free speech? That it's "naive" to think that people should have freedom of speech?> Not trying to answer for anyone else, only me.
What is naive is to think this is a free country anymore. That ship sailed. And you cannot swim fast enough to catch up to it. |
|
Jan-11-21
| | OhioChessFan: 2. I am willing to defend my affirmation that we can't know the oral teachings of the apostles that weren't recorded during the lifetime of the apostles. |
|
| Jan-11-21 | | thegoodanarchist: <OhioChessFan: 2. I am willing to defend my affirmation that we can't know the oral teachings of the apostles that weren't recorded during the lifetime of the apostles.> I applaud your courage.
Sorry, just teasing. I could not resist the jest. This is not the first time that you have asserted your willingness to defend some position or other. IIRC, the last time you did so, I requested that you go ahead and defend it, and not just <assert> that you would defend it. So... I DO INDEED look forward to your defense. Who knows? We might not even disagree! (Wouldn't we BOTH be dissapointed in that case?) |
|
Jan-13-21
| | gezafan: <thegoodanarchist: < gezafan:
Regardless of one's opinion of the Catholic Church, throughout history there have been Catholic priests who were good men who tried to help people. > Are you Catholic? Just curious.
BTW, I agree with you. The body of Christ is composed of fallible humans with corrupt flesh. Not only that, the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, looking for whom he may devour. Thus, Christ's church will always have bad apples, unto Judgement Day, due to these two influences. Father Ripperger is one of the good ones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETJ... I'd rather not give out any personal information. I did watch a good portion of the video you posted and will watch the rest later. It's good stuff. I see he has other videos too. I forwarded the video to someone I know who I know will be interested.. |
|
| Jan-13-21 | | Big Pawn: <Gezafan>, did you see my three posts (back one page) on the 45 goals of the Communist Party in America? |
|
| Jan-13-21 | | Big Pawn: Attention All Elite Posters! This is an important post and I'm asking you all to kindly read this long post and not just skim through it. Is the Free Speech Zone a symposium for the Elite Posters or not? Is this a place for genuine <thinkers> or is it not? ***
Is the Left really calling for concentration camps for Christians and conservatives? I will answer this directly but first, let me set this up. Why should Americans keep their guns? To shoot and kill tyrants and protect their liberty should the need arise. When libs ask, "Why do you NEED semi-automatic military-style weapons", the answer should be "to keep tyranny at bay." Americans will understand this, but Euro and Aussie libs won't. They're the product of much woke brainwashing. The libs have been trying to grab our guns for a long time, and if they had them already, we'd be on trains, naked, separated from our families, being hauled off to our doom with no hope and only despair. I've said this before, but my words were met with scorn, scoffing, and ridicule. But now that the libs are intoxicated with the prospect of power, now that Trump appears to be out, both houses under lib control, big tech brazenly and nakedly killing free speech, goons of brown shirts (BLM, Antifa) ready to burn down American at a moment's notice, and a thoroughly corrupt justice system dedicated to the cause of furthering their Satanic, politically correct, Marxist-globalist agenda, they are taking their masks off and letting us see their true intentions. They feel they no longer need to hide who they really are. Anti-gun Euro and Aussie Cucks, as well as typical American lib cucks, think that I've been using alarmist language and hyperbole to defend my unjustifiable pro-gun-nut stance. However, look at what the libs are saying.
<Former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo recently tweeted that “me-first capitalists” who disagree with injecting political activism into their workplaces will be “the first people lined up against the wall and shot in the revolution.” The company has not commented if the tweet by Costolo, who has an estimated net worth of $300 million, violates its policies against glorifying violence.> https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020... That's on the top of the pile, but what about the libs on the bottom of the pile? Say, just your average, nobody, everyday lib? <al wazir: What we need now is help from the Chinese.
Currently, they have detained over a million Uighurs in so-called "vocational training centers" in Xinjiang. These are actually concentration camps in which the prisoners, who are members of Muslim minorities, are infused with communist doctrines and nationalist sentiment, enforced by physical coercion. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...This is pretty severe, but it's the sort of thing the commies are good at. Here in the U.S., we have 75 million people who are similarly in need of having their thinking realigned. But straightening out ignorant, deluded, bigoted, paranoid citizens is *not* the sort of thing we Americans are good at. Do you see where I'm going with this?
It's time to make a deal.>
You'll notice that none of the libs on the Other Page pushed back on <Al-Wazir's> call for concentration camps where Christians and conservatives are tortured for being non-pc. They didn't push back on his fantasy of China <helping> us do it. <Perfidious>, <Saffuna>, <Larry "I spit in the gorge">, <Nok>, <Bureaucrat>, <Wilbur G>, <HMM>, <Everett>, <Chancho>, <Zanzibar> - none of them pushed back on this, argued against this. Their silence means they condone it.
This is why the libs aren't alarmed at the prospect of Joe Biden being a puppet of China, nor are they worried about the threat of China, communism and the takeover of America as we know it. Keep your guns, Elite Posters, keep your guns.
Now you know what the libs say among themselves, when not online, in private, in their little groups when they know that no one is listening. You know the heart of the libs now. |
|
| Jan-13-21 | | Big Pawn: Attention Elite Posters!
In line with my previous post:
<Sanders Campaign Organizer: Free Education, Gulags Needed To "Re-Educate" You To Not Be A "@#$%ing Nazi"> https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...! Keep your guns. Don't listen to the Eurolibs. Don't listen to the Aussie-Libs. You gotta keep your guns, or you'll be on the train. <Author Paul Rosenberg examines the arguments in writings by John Feffer and other anti-Trump pundits who believe there is a lot of work to be done to force the “de-trumpification” of America. They compare Trump supporters to Nazis or the Baathists of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and describe America under Trump as a “pathocracy.”> <He even brings up the Nuremberg trials as instructive, trials that resulted in death sentences for 37 Nazis. It’s important to go after “low-level participants” to root out Trumpism. It recommends enforcing this changing of “hearts and minds” so that there is “an attitudinal shift that could lead to lasting transformation.” This is not a far cry from re-education camps and coercive thought reform.> https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/2... Robert Reich calls for sending Trump supporters to the Ministry of Truth. <
When this nightmare is over, we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It would erase Trump’s lies, comfort those who have been harmed by his hatefulness, and name every official, politician, executive, and media mogul whose greed and cowardice enabled this catastrophe. — Robert Reich (@RBReich) October 17, 2020> Removed from society? Sounds like <Al Wazir's> concentration camps. Read what Keith Olberman had to say. <former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann recently ranted that everyone associated with Trump, including his enablers and supporters, must be “prosecuted and convicted and removed from our society.”> Concentration camps, "eradication" from society and etc...The libs have this train of thought going on. <CNN contributor Reza Aslan announced on Twitter — a tweet still up as of Oct. 22 — that all Trump supporters “must be eradicated from society” along with Trump, and that there is “no longer any room for nuance.”> https://twitter.com/rezaaslan/statu... Keep your guns. You need them. |
|
Jan-13-21
| | gezafan: In the late 1960s and early 1970s the radical leftists were discussing how many people they would kill after they took power. I remember one estimate was 25 million. These are the people now in power in the USA. |
|
Jan-13-21
| | gezafan: <Big Pawn: <Gezafan>, did you see my three posts (back one page) on the 45 goals of the Communist Party in America?> Yes, I've long been aware of this list. What's disheartening is that you can, if you can get them to listen, show liberals this list, go over it point by point and show how its happening and it doesn't affect them at all! It doesn't faze them! I've done this. They won't try to refute what you say, or even try to discuss it. They simply ignore you and attack you on a personal basis. They're impervious to reason. I don't think liberals can be reached on a rational basis. All I can think of to do is give them the arguments and facts when I can and hope it will affect them in the future. |
|
Jan-13-21
| | OhioChessFan: #31, Russia is a bit of a toxic word these days, but the rest of it we've lost. 32, we've lost in a rout. Total disaster. 33 and 34 aren't that big a deal any more. 35, the libs have been the ones to see the FBI discredited, so that's a bit of a win. 36, unions have always and will always be Socialist cesspools. They don't need any help/encouragement, so that's pretty much moot. 37, we've lost. 38, THAT one is a bit frightening. Right out of the Communist playbook, the defund police movement is calling for social workers to show up. Wow, that one is a massive eye opener for me, the biggest of the entire list. 39 doesn't seem too important. 40, we've lost. Families aren't respected. I think that is moral a moral failure, a loss to Satan, than to the communists. But they're both on the same side. |
|
Jan-13-21
| | gezafan: Our world is being overrun by evil people. Today we have a fight of good versus evil. It's not just Democrats versus Republican it's come to the point that it's good versus evil. And the Democrat Party is run by evil people. |
|
Jan-13-21
| | gezafan: A friend sent me a Tucker Carlsen video about Donald Trump. I couldn't watch it. It was already removed. |
|
Jan-13-21
| | OhioChessFan: Finishing up. 41 has proven harder to win than they thought. 42, Antifa is currently the standard bearer. We'll see how that plays out. I don't picture a bunch of snowflakes winning a physical battle though, so I think overall that's been a win.43 and 44 are mostly irrelevant. 45 remains a goal, but they're far from winning. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 216 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
Kibitzing
