chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Chessgames Bookie
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Mar-10-21
no bio

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Chessgames Bookie has kibitzed 2101 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-08-21 Chessgames Bookie chessforum (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Thanks for the tip, WinKing. Hope it works because, to tell you the truth, I'm feeling a bit frustrated. ciao, jingo
 
   Jan-08-21 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: It would be great if we could get the Bookie site set up to start the new leg with the TATA Steel tournament about to begin in a week. Thanks
 
   Dec-26-20 Sargon chessforum (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Sargon, Could we get an adminstrator to close out the Fall Leg of the Chessbookie? Prizes and reset all to $1000, or more if we're not going to get a mid-leg payday? Thanks, jingo Gens una sumus!
 
   Oct-07-20 Norway Chess (2020) (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Please join us at the ChessBookie room for some fun wagering, play money. Tough competition! Altibox Norway 2020, Rd 6: Aronian-Caruana Thanks
 
   Oct-01-20 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Rub your lucky charm! Time to bet on the Winner of the upcoming Altibox tournament. Altibox Norway 2020: Winner! Gens una sumus
 
   Sep-16-20 Petrosian vs G Stoltz, 1952 (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: I had no idea that Kotov won that tournament, and with what a score!!
 
   Sep-15-20 St. Louis Rapid & Blitz (2020) (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: And how will Alireza do tomorrow against the Champ? St. Louis Rapid & Blitz, Rd 7 Rapid: Firouzja-Carlsen Place your bet (after checking your crystal ball, of course).
 
   Sep-13-20 Champions Showdown Chess 9LX (2020) (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Speaking of draws, how many today in round 7? Starts in a few hours. Only one in Rd 6 yesterday. Place your bets! Click ChessBookie at the top of the page to play!
 
   Apr-19-20 moronovich chessforum (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Hi moronovich, I'm jingohanson, the new Bookie. The Pick two is for day four of the event, with the games I posted. Sorry about the confusion. I should have put (Day 4) in the description. Thanks for welcoming me. Your suggestions are welcome. Ciao, jingohanson
 
   Dec-23-19 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Chessgames Bookie: Just for the record. Annie and Twinlark were volunteers. I posted more on my profile page. 😊
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 97 OF 501 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-27-07  technical draw: <POD> Yes.
Sep-27-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <Mexico WCC: Rd 12: Pick Three : Draw/White/Black [cash in ticket] 30 YOU WIN! COLLECT 2436>

Looks like I'm back at the upper end again! :)

Sep-27-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: <pawnofdoom: Is there any way to discard all lost tickets at once? ... Is there any button around that says something like "discard all"?> Look at the area that says "YOUR TICKETS", on the right side there is a link that says "discard all losing tickets."
Sep-27-07  malthrope: <Annie K.: <Mexico WCC: Rd 12: Pick Three : Draw/White/Black [cash in ticket] 30 YOU WIN! COLLECT 2436> Looks like I'm back at the upper end again! :)>

Way to GO <Annie K.> - I caught it too at $56 c-bucks! Also, had Moro to win, Svid-Vishy = draw & Ruy Lopez (opening). Guessing that I just plum forgot to bet on 1 draw? ;-)

Heard a rumor through the CG.com bookie grapevine that <TD> actually bet on Gelfand to win in Rd. #12? ...Oops - guess he's finally losing his touch. ~lol~

<WannaBe: Okay, Gonna give you the stats for Saturday's games also... [...] Until next time! Handi-Capper's Corner is on vacation!!>

Thanks again <WannaBe> just one heck of a bang up job with the 'Handi-Capper's Corner!' You have a great vacation!! :-) - Mal

PS: All the early reports of my 'betting death' here have been greatly exaggerated! ~ROFL~

Sep-27-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <malthrope> Wow, you must be one rich guy. Congrats! :)

<TD>, oh well, you just can't lose'em all! ;)

Yeah, thanks <WannaBe>, although I'm actually of two minds on that - the Handi-Capper's Corner can be very convenient to be sure, but I mostly tend to do my own research, and it also frustrates me sometimes that WannaBe just hands the info on a platter to those who can't be bothered to look things up for themselves. Why reward laziness? :\

Sep-27-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Annie K.> To look up the stats, that's available to all members, not just the premiums.

But for me, being someone who likes to wager a few real bucks here and there, to do the 'Corner' is a kick... (No soccer pun intended there...)

And if you look at <YouRang>'s running list of standings, I'm at the bottom!! (Of all 3 categories! Go figure!! =)

Sep-28-07  malthrope: <Annie K.: <malthrope> Wow, you must be one rich guy. Congrats! :)>

Thanks <Annie K.> ! :-) Of course that's what the Loanshark keeps telling me, 'I'll make you rich my boy!' ...and mumbled under his breath, 'Except for the usual carrying charges...' You'd think this was 'Casablanca' but we weren't exactly at Rick's! ~lol~

<WannaBe: [...] But for me, being someone who likes to wager a few real bucks here and there, to do the 'Corner' is a kick... (No soccer pun intended there...) And if you look at <YouRang>'s running list of standings, I'm at the bottom!! (Of all 3 categories! Go figure!! =)>

Still though <WannaBe> predicting the results of a chess tournament game by game and round by round is entirely different than manipulating money in a mixed betting system. Which features a variety of odds based on the bets and visions of the bettors with all the 'vig's' being tightly controled and structured by the House! ... Like comparing 'apples' and 'oranges!' ;-) - Mal

Sep-28-07  malthrope: BTW 'ChessBookie.com' - aren't we following the same terrible pairing ~SNAFU~ that occurred in Round #6? If the mirror image is correct then the precise pairings for Round #13 should be:

Svidler-Grischuk
Anand-Leko
Morozevich-Gelfand
Kramnik-Aronian

...and Round #14:

Aronian-Svidler
Gelfand-Kramnik
Leko-Morozevich
Grischuk-Anand

Or has FIDE issued a quickie 'Press Release' finally apologizing for the horrendous pairing mistake previously which is now being corrected by now finally reversing the two? <this is total confusion at work>

Thanks for your time! ;-) Regards, - Mal

Sep-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Hi malthrope:

Maybe they have some reason to break the symmetry during the last two rounds, I don't know. All I can do is go by the officially published pairings. If indeed they switch everything around at the last minute like the did in round 6 then sadly I'll have to refund all the tickets for round 13.

If I go by the published schedule, and it's wrong, then nobody can blame me. But if I try to second-guess their system and we're wrong, I look like a total fool, and my boss will get very angry. (He hates it when we refund tickets--there's no juice!)

Sep-28-07  technical draw: This Johnny-come-lately Tartarsauce thinks he can just come in and take over the cellar without consecuences. Well he's got another think coming cause now I have a lot of chessbucks and I'm betting them on the worse losers in history and we'll see who winds up last! I'm antepenultimate and that's scary.
Sep-28-07  MarkThornton: <Chessgames Bookie: Hi malthrope:

Maybe they have some reason to break the symmetry during the last two rounds, I don't know. All I can do is go by the officially published pairings. If indeed they switch everything around at the last minute like the did in round 6 then sadly I'll have to refund all the tickets for round 13.

If I go by the published schedule, and it's wrong, then nobody can blame me. But if I try to second-guess their system and we're wrong, I look like a total fool, and my boss will get very angry. (He hates it when we refund tickets--there's no juice!)>

At the moment, (2pm GMT), the official website has the pairings as per your betting slips. We have to go with that....

...but please can I bet 500 chessbucks on FIDE having made another mistake? ;-)

Sep-28-07  malthrope: <Chessgames Bookie: Hi malthrope: [...] If I go by the published schedule, and it's wrong, then nobody can blame me. But if I try to second-guess their system and we're wrong, I look like a total fool, and my boss will get very angry. (He hates it when we refund tickets--there's no juice!)>

Understood! ~lol~ I say let the 'juice' flow! ;-)

____________________________________________

<technical draw: [...] ...cause now I have a lot of chessbucks and I'm betting them on the worse losers in history and we'll see who winds up last! I'm antepenultimate and that's scary.>

He's baaaaaaaaaaccccccccccck... Go <TD> GO! :-)

____________________________________________

<MarkThornton: Chessgames Bookie: Hi malthrope: [...] At the moment, (2pm GMT), the official website has the pairings as per your betting slips. We have to go with that.... ...but please can I bet 500 chessbucks on FIDE having made another mistake? ;-)>

Yep! (sad as it is...). My betting limit is a tad higher than yours <MarkThornton> atm, so you can decidedly count me in for my bet of $2,500 c-bucks that FIDE eats it! ~ROFL~ ;-) - Mal

PS: That's of course with no 'counter measures' necessary! ~lol~

Sep-29-07  technical draw: Well, I'm next to last now. I jumped one space. Only Tartarsauce is in my way. I still have one outstanding loser. (Moro to win the tournament).. So it's going to be close!
Sep-29-07  malthrope: Hehehe... Seems like a lot of us had trouble with our WCC last round #14 bets. I would have made more c-bucks by just kicking back and relaxing with my knitting (aka: 'Mr. Lucky' - classic movie reference). Perhaps betting *only* on a nice quiet Petroff Defense with a Ruy (Marshall) thrown in for good measure would have done the trick!? ~lol~

[Inserting short rant: 'Please excuse me just a sec while I strangle Gris for playing that specific opening line against Svid...']

~ROFL~ ;-) - Mal

PS: Peter probably knows that line better than anyone, atm, having analyzed it heavily after his loss in San Luis - Svidler vs Topalov, 2005

Sep-29-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: Well, I'm up 500 this round (betting on Kramnik and Svidler(!!) to win didn't hurt) - and I thought my place in the top 10 was a done deal, and I should just pull a Kramnik and sit tight on my winnings, avoiding any further risk for the rest of the leg... and then the leaderboard is updated and I find out that I've even slipped a place down! Hmmph. Competition is tough around here! :s
Sep-29-07  malthrope: <Annie K.: [...] and then the leaderboard is updated and I find out that I've even slipped a place down! Hmmph. Competition is tough around here! :s>

Fear not <Annie K.> - it's just another version of the infamous 'musical betting chairs' that CG.com likes to taunt us with! ~lol~ ;-)

Sep-29-07  technical draw: All right!! I'm back in first place again!! From the bottom , that is! I had Tartarsauce for lunch...What a fight!!
Sep-30-07  TIMER: Well, I am surprised- I saw buriag with 5000 more than me during my break period, that made me wish that I had made some bigger bets (like 500s rather 50s as results have been pretty predictable): first day I lost 500, then last 2 days I won 1000 per day (this is me still playing very safe too- not going all-out in the way I used to).

I expected some-one to be around 20,000 right now- but I am grateful that you are all just waiting for my proper return (probably in mid-October). (just kidding. I see that maybe my policy of hardly playing might have been the safest route to the top while others crash and rise!)

Sep-30-07  malthrope: <TIMER: Well, I am surprised- [...] ...I expected some-one to be around 20,000 right now- [...] I see that maybe my policy of hardly playing might have been the safest route to the top while others crash and rise!)>

HaHaHa! Yep that about sums it all up <TIMER> ! :-)

I sure had my share of <near misses> as mentioned previously where I could have been in the +20K range if all the chips fell just right... You know what they say, 'Close only counts in Horseshoes!' (where even there you can score points). The last bet at Mexico City in round #14 proved to be trickier than some of us expected. Had I just went conservative with a few key bets especially in the 'Openings' used could have easily picked up 7.5-10K. Kudos to <Annie K.> for just betting on Kramnik and Svidler to win! (I lost a lot of c-bucks betting on a non-decisive result in 'Svidler-Grischuk'). However, that would have been lacking tension & drama and absolutely no fun whatsoever! ~lol~

At least one thing proved to be true... After a few mishaps <TD> finally found his way back to the cellar! Now we just await to see what Chess Bookie can throw at us next... ;-) Regards, - Mal

Sep-30-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Chessgames recently announced the first ever Fischerandom (Chess960) team-game on the Fischerandom Chess Generator page.

On October 3rd the starting position will be announced. They will use the results of the Florida "Cash 3" Lottery to determine the starting position. The method is simple:

<On Wednesday, October 3rd, we will check the drawing for Florida's "Cash 3" lottery. This will be a 3-digit number generated by a specialized lottery machine which agitates and selects ping-pong balls randomly. We will then plug that 3-digit number into the Fischerandom Chess Generator above (being careful to keep the 'random' checkbox unchecked) and we will use whatever position is indicated by that number.

In the unlikely event that the October 3rd Florida Cash3 lottery is a number above 960, or if it equals 000, we will then use October 3rd's "Play 4" as a backup by using the first three digits and disregarding the final digit.>

Three wagers are now available so that you can speculate the nature of the position--specifically, which files will contain the queens, which files will contain the kings, and which files will contain the bishops?

Chessgames Challenge: Chess960 Starting Position: Kings

Chessgames Challenge: Chess960 Starting Position: Queens

Chessgames Challenge: Chess960 Starting Position: Bishops

This is purely random and mindless gambling at its finest. Good luck to all!

Sep-30-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <This is purely random and mindless gambling at its finest. Good luck to all!>

CG.com must have hired a new gal/guy. I'm seeing a sense of humour never seen before from all the admins.

It's kinda funny, based upon the writing style, and prose, you can 'tell' that it's a different person writing/posting, even though it's under one of the admin names...

Oct-01-07  malthrope: <WannaBe: <This is purely random and mindless gambling at its finest. Good luck to all!>

[...] I'm seeing a sense of humour never seen before from all the admins.>

Could very well be true <WannaBe> as I too have noticed a brevity in attitude in CG Bookie's mood of late. :-)

The Chessgames Challenge: Chess960 Starting Position: Bishops bet looks like a bloody nightmare with 16 possibilities to choose between and only one winner...

Slightly better odds are given on Chessgames Challenge: Chess960 Starting Position: Queens with only 8 possibilities to choose from with one winner...

Saving the best for last! The Chessgames Challenge: Chess960 Starting Position: Kings is the smartest move with only 6 six possibilities to place your bet on with one winner!

We can thank the official rules of setup before engagement that the King(s) must be placed between the two rooks for that one! ~lol~

However, I suppose the odds will win in the end and the greed of easy c-bucks will get us betting on literally everything (which is exactly what is happening right now).

So, I just might be tempted to gamble my luck on the Kings! ;-) - Mal

Oct-01-07  Tactic101: I'm broke, so betting a little more can't hurt...... :)

Oct-01-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <Mal <Kudos to <Annie K.> for just betting on Kramnik and Svidler to win!>>

Well, I placed lots of other bets, I just mentioned the two most spectacular successes. :) I also had bets on Anand-Leko to play Ruy and draw (missed on Moro-Gelfand's Petroff though, and the result) and invested 600 in the Pick Three only to get back 615... I could easily have gone around 1000 up or down in any given round of this tourney, which is a bit more conservative than I usually play. ;)

<I'm seeing a sense of humour never seen before from all the admins>

Hey, I have to defend the admins here! I have actually noted manifestations of a pretty good sense of humor on several occasions from the admins - agreed that not so much from the Bookie though. ;)

<Tactic101: <I'm broke, so betting a little more can't hurt...... :) >>

Get a little closer to TD and say that again... ;)

Oct-03-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Question ...

are all 6 ranks for the kings equally probable? It would seem to me that there would be less chance of the kings appearing on the b and g files, since in those cases the a-file (or h-file) is "fixed' -- it has to be a rook. However if the king is on the d or e files there is a multitude of possible configurations to the left and right of the king.

Or maybe I'm just dead wrong--the 7 squares to the right of the king on the b-file makes up for the lack of possibilities to the left of the king. And likewise, for the kings that start on the g-file.

Does anybody know?

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 501)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 97 OF 501 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC