Fusilli Member since Aug-09-04 · Last seen Jan-12-26 Mariano Sana, Argentinian by birth, in the US since 1995. Naturalized US citizen. I hold a PhD in Demography from the University of Pennsylvania, and I am an associate professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University: https://as.vanderbilt.edu/sociology.... Previously, I was at Louisiana State University (2003-2009). My published academic work can be seen here: https://vanderbilt.academia.edu/Mar.... My review of Gary Alan Fine's "Players and Pawns" is here: https://www.academia.edu/69647923/P.... My avatar comes from a cartoon of mine drawn by a friend. My username, besides the pasta, is my late cat's name (he died in March 2021, age 19), inspired by this cartoon: https://condenaststore.com/featured.... My first tournament was at age 12 in 1979. I finished 8th in the Argentine junior championship in 1985. So, I was good enough, but not great. (That same evaluation might still be apt today, on a good day.) Unfortunately, no game scores survived from those years. I started to play again after grad school. I play between 0 and 4 tournaments per year. I won the Louisiana State Championship in 2007. I lost the first game and then won six in a row. This was my last round win, where I got lucky after playing the opening pretty terribly: J Rousselle vs M Sana, 2007. I also won the under 2200 section of the US Open in 2014. Again, Swiss gambit. Lost the first one, then won five in a row, lost game 7 (M Sana vs J Sheng, 2014, a rather atypical game), and won games 8 and 9. My last round win was featured as a Tuesday puzzle: K Gulamali vs M Sana, 2014. (Try it! Black to play at move 29. But you can also do black to play at move 22 as a principled-move puzzle.) I'd say that I am essentially a good but inconsistent player. My playing style is a mix of strategic and tactical. I'm usually very willing to sac a pawn or allow positional weaknesses in exchange for active piece play. For years I hovered around 2200, down to mid 2100s a few years ago after a disaster and a 50-point loss at the 2019 World Open. (Aging and MS fatigue had much to do with that.) On good days, I have had nice wins: T Bartell vs M Sana, 2009, R Burnett vs M Sana, 2012, M Sana vs C Blocker, 2014, M Sana vs R Burnett, 2015. But on a bad day, I can play horribly and lose against whoever is sitting in front of me. I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2011, but it didn't cause me trouble until 2018/9. I have a weak right leg (I often use a cane now) and I fatigue easily. Medication, well-timed naps, and exercise help. I play blitz games on chess.com under the username RealFusilli. My participation on this website goes through ebbs and flows, and the majority of my posts are about chess. I often post on my own forum just to keep records for myself. Everyone is welcome to visit and share! (But please don't post about politics here.)

Fusilli has kibitzed 6341 times to chessgames   [more...]

Jan-12-26 Fusilli chessforum   Fusilli: <arek> Good to see you around here, my friend, though those are distressing news I'm sorry to hear. I have now recovered, I am back in the classroom, life has returned to normal. I still have a minor lingering cough, which I hope gets tired of me and leaves me soon. Cheers.      Jan-10-26 Sax vs Karpov, 1989    Fusilli: <perfidious> Well, that merits some discussion. For a while, white has been preferring d3 in move 5 or 6, but if white chooses the traditional closed set up, and doesn't go for 8.a4, the Breyer continues to be black's top preference on move 9. (I play it frequently in blitz ...      Jan-09-26 Kasparov vs Nunn, 1989    Fusilli: <Check It Out: I also assumed Nunn would be saved by something but if the kibitzing here is to be believed, it's Kasparov who was fortunate to make a draw.> My reaction too, though without reading any kibitzing first. I played through the game and got the feeling that Kasparov      Jan-04-26 NN vs G Chandler, 1995   Fusilli: Or Ke7 instead of Nxc1, right? I'm happy to see Ke7 and not O-O, btw. Reminds me of the famous Ed Lasker vs G Thomas, 1912 , where many folks claim that O-O-O# would have been "cool" by comparison to the "boring" Kd2#, which Lasker played. Nonsense. The king doesn't need to rush to      Jan-03-26 chessgames.com chessforum    Fusilli: Suggestion: Can the Russian Championship Superfinal (2005) , which he won, be added to the list of Sergei Rublevsky notable tournaments?      Jan-02-26 Petrosian vs Unzicker, 1960   Fusilli: That king relocation is epic. No reason to rush g4!      Jan-02-26 Biographer Bistro    Fusilli: Can Russian Championship Superfinal (2005) , which he won, be added to the list of Sergei Rublevsky notable tournaments?      Jan-01-26 Portisch vs I Radulov, 1974    Fusilli: This is absolutely mind-boggling.      Jan-01-26 A Isanzhulov vs Ivanchuk, 2025   Fusilli: Poor Ivanchuk.      Dec-30-25 M Miazhynski vs J Durana, 2025    Fusilli: Wait, what? 6.O-O? Bc5? Surely someone messed up the score sheet!

indicates a reply to the comment.

My Facerook Wall

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 73 OF 114 ·  Later Kibitzing> Nov-28-22    areknames: <Well done, Brazil.> It was almost like watching that '82 side again, complete domination. Only difference is that they now care about defence ;) Nov-28-22    areknames: I would never have thought that I would be rooting for Iran at a WC but I did and I went "yes!" when they scored. What a magnificent effort against Wales, they really deserved the win. Great that Costa Rica's still alive also. Nov-28-22    saffuna: Absolutely brilliant goal from Brazil (the one that counted) against Switzerland. Great teamwork and great shot. I love watching that. Nov-28-22    Fusilli: I had to miss all games today so far. I have Portugal v Uruguay opened on a different window, but can't watch it. Too busy. I'll watch the 5-min FIFA videos later. It seems that it is a super-exciting World Cup day. <areknames> <Great that Costa Rica's still alive also.> That is great, although from what I could see of that game, it was sheer luck, wasn't it? (Both good luck for CR and bad luck for Japan.) Nov-29-22    technical draw: I got up early to watch the games only to find out that the games will be played simultaneously. Two games at 11am and two games at 3pm. They do this to avoid shenanigans like not playing to win because you have already secured a spot in the next round. Sounds like chess and the prearranged draws. And they will take the phones away from the participants so they can't find out who's winning. I think that's much ado about nothing and will just sour more people on the WC. Too many rules spoil the game. Nov-29-22    Fusilli: <TD> Actually, there is a good reason for the simultaneity of the last games in the group stage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgr.... It was discussed some posts ago. Nov-29-22    technical draw: <Fusilli> I remember that game. My point is that FIFA is using a hammer to remove a feather. They should remember that soccer is a spectator sport. Without spectators there is no point in playing. There are other ways to prevent cheating. Nov-29-22    Fusilli: Work break for a blitz game on chess.com. I am white and I am totally lost: click for larger view 64.Re1 click for larger view The idea is that if black moves the knight, Rf1+ trades rooks and the king captures the pawn, drawing. Black wins in many ways... except if he moves the knight 64...Ne3 click for larger view The knight controls the f1 square now... and yet... Pretty, isn't it? Nov-29-22    Fusilli: Nice job, US! Especially the first half! Nov-29-22    saffuna: <The knight controls the f1 square now... and yet...> Ouch! Nov-30-22    areknames: WORLD CUP TRIVIA Watching Denmark play, one realizes that their gk Kasper Schmeichel is of course the son of Peter Schmeichel, the legendary gk of Manchester Utd and Denmark. The only other father/son duo who both have played in the World Cup that I could think of are Italy's Cesare and Paolo Maldini. How many duos can you name? There are many more than I would have thought, there's even a duo where father and son played in the WC but for different countries! Dec-01-22    technical draw: Does anyone here really believe that Tunisia beat France? Something fishy is going on with this World Cup. I am losing interest. Dec-01-22    optimal play: <technical draw: Does anyone here really believe that Tunisia beat France?> No. Although it was apparently a second string French side, most of the French team are Tunisians themselves, aren't they? When Tunisia scored and went up 1-0 the message came through to the Australian coach that we had to beat Denmark to progress, so that at least seemed to spur us on. Anyway, Mariano won't have to worry too much. There's no chance we can beat Argentina. Dec-01-22    technical draw: <op> <Anyway, Mariano won't have to worry too much. There's no chance we can beat Argentina.> Well, that's what Saudi Arabia thought but they pulled the biggest surprise so far by beating Argentina. If France did not play their best players so as to give them a rest (since they had already secured advancement) it's still makes this a bad thing. It's like playing an pre-agreed draw in chess, it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. Dec-01-22    Fusilli: Yes, Argentina is expected to beat Australia but I think no Argentine takes anything for granted anymore. Argentina played very well and Poland was passive, nonambitious, and apparently even petty, happy with qualifying with a loss. France should send them packing. I concede the penalty was a bad call. Can't believe the ref would call it even after checking the screen. That it wasn't a goal was divine justice, but Argentina won deservedly. Dec-01-22    Fusilli: How about this one? White to play and win click for larger view I saw it on Instagram, with no attribution. Dec-01-22    areknames: <White to play and win> Took me a couple of minutes, but Ra4! should do it. No effective checks for Black, if Qxa4 then Rh3+ and Rh4+ winning the Q, if Qc8 covering the mate on h3 then Rh3+! all the same. Nice one. Dec-01-22    areknames: <There's no chance we can beat Argentina> I agree, this is Australia's 5th consecutive appearance at the WC and never before has there been a squad so devoid of real talent. Yet they've managed 2 wins so Arnold and his boys must be doing something right, but unfortunately for the Aussies there's no risk of underestimation after Argentina's debacle with the Saudis. And honestly, Mooy and Leckie rather than Kewell and Cahill? I don't think so. Dec-01-22    optimal play: <technical draw: <op> <Anyway, Mariano won't have to worry too much. There's no chance we can beat Argentina.> Well, that's what Saudi Arabia thought but they pulled the biggest surprise so far by beating Argentina.> Yes, it's funny how things sometimes work out. Despite beating Argentina, the Saudi's haven't made it out of the first round. Also, Saudi Arabia and Japan finished ahead of Australia in our regional qualifying group, which meant they automatically qualified while Australia had to play off against Peru. <areknames: <There's no chance we can beat Argentina> I agree, this is Australia's 5th consecutive appearance at the WC and never before has there been a squad so devoid of real talent. Yet they've managed 2 wins so Arnold and his boys must be doing something right, but unfortunately for the Aussies there's no risk of underestimation after Argentina's debacle with the Saudis. And honestly, Mooy and Leckie rather than Kewell and Cahill? I don't think so.> Totally agree. That 2006 side was our best ever and was unlucky not to beat Italy in the second round (who went on to win it). Quite honestly, we were very lucky to even make it to this World Cup and yet we've managed to get to the second round, but it will come to an end against Argentina. Dec-01-22    Fusilli: <areknames: <White to play and win> Took me a couple of minutes, but Ra4! should do it. No effective checks for Black, if Qxa4 then Rh3+ and Rh4+ winning the Q, if Qc8 covering the mate on h3 then Rh3+! all the same. Nice one.> Right on! Dec-01-22    Fusilli: I'm skipping the games today. This WC thing is bad for productivity! I'll watch the recaps later. Enjoy! Dec-01-22    OhioChessFan: I hope Vanderbilt has smarter students than UCLA. https://youtu.be/QsDVwYqs0ws Dec-01-22    technical draw: Spain/Japan game was very good. Also the fact that everyone was also waiting for the results of the Germany/Costa Rica game made it all the more exciting. Spain and Japan are in and Germany is out...goal difference. Dec-02-22    Fusilli: <OCF> OK, I quit after 3 minutes. It looked like the quiz was over and the subject was changing, but I couldn't stomach it anymore. I suspect in some cases it's stupidity rather than ignorance. Maybe someone knows the answer, but they get nervous, think it's a trick question ("there is no capital!"), panic before the camera... Still no excuse though. Didn't you love the one who didn't want to rush an answer because she didn't "want to look dumb"? Dec-02-22    Fusilli: <TD> Exciting day! Can't believe Germany is out. And Morocco and Japan ended up winning their groups! I watched the video summaries and it looked like Belgium was quite unlucky. Too many miraculous saves for Croatia. Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 114) search thread:    < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 73 OF 114 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.