Fusilli Member since Aug-09-04 · Last seen Apr-01-26 Mariano Sana, Argentinian by birth, in the US since 1995. Naturalized US citizen. I hold a PhD in Demography from the University of Pennsylvania, and I am an associate professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University: https://as.vanderbilt.edu/sociology.... Previously, I was at Louisiana State University (2003-2009). My published academic work can be seen here: https://vanderbilt.academia.edu/Mar.... My review of Gary Alan Fine's "Players and Pawns" is here: https://www.academia.edu/69647923/P.... My avatar comes from a cartoon of mine drawn by a friend. My username, besides the pasta, is my late cat's name (he died in March 2021, age 19), inspired by this cartoon: https://condenaststore.com/featured.... My first tournament was at age 12 in 1979. I finished 8th in the Argentine junior championship in 1985. So, I was good enough, but not great. (That same evaluation might still be apt today, on a good day.) Unfortunately, no game scores survived from those years. I started to play again after grad school. I play between 0 and 4 tournaments per year. I won the Louisiana State Championship in 2007. I lost the first game and then won six in a row. This was my last round win, where I got lucky after playing the opening pretty terribly: J Rousselle vs M Sana, 2007. I also won the under 2200 section of the US Open in 2014. Again, Swiss gambit. Lost the first one, then won five in a row, lost game 7 (M Sana vs J Sheng, 2014, a rather atypical game), and won games 8 and 9. My last round win was featured as a Tuesday puzzle: K Gulamali vs M Sana, 2014. (Try it! Black to play at move 29. But you can also do black to play at move 22 as a principled-move puzzle.) I'd say that I am essentially a good but inconsistent player. My playing style is a mix of strategic and tactical. I'm usually very willing to sac a pawn or allow positional weaknesses in exchange for active piece play. For years I hovered around 2200, down to mid 2100s a few years ago after a disaster and a 50-point loss at the 2019 World Open. (Aging and MS fatigue had much to do with that.) On good days, I have had nice wins: T Bartell vs M Sana, 2009, R Burnett vs M Sana, 2012, M Sana vs C Blocker, 2014, M Sana vs R Burnett, 2015. But on a bad day, I can play horribly and lose against whoever is sitting in front of me. I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2011, but it didn't cause me trouble until 2018/9. I have a weak right leg (I often use a cane now) and I fatigue easily. Medication, well-timed naps, and exercise help. I play blitz games on chess.com under the username RealFusilli. My participation on this website goes through ebbs and flows, and the majority of my posts are about chess. I often post on my own forum just to keep records for myself. Everyone is welcome to visit and share! (But please don't post about politics here.)

Fusilli has kibitzed 6475 times to chessgames   [more...]

Apr-01-26 Fusilli chessforum    Fusilli: < OhioChessFan: <sfod: video of Feynman: > Per his claim not to be afraid of not knowing and not having a purpose, I choose not to believe him.> Good wording, <OCF>... the <choose> part. I do believe him (or choose to), mostly because fright has nothing to do      Mar-29-26 Chessgames - Literature   Fusilli: <That film's name was "Bram Stoker's Dracula" and was a rather faithful adaption of the book, I think.> Great film, and packed with top acting talent.      Mar-25-26 Van der Wiel vs Kasparov, 1982   Fusilli: <Whitehat1963: What happens after 23. Nh6+ Kf8 (or Kh8) 24. Nf4?> <mertangili: <whitehat1963> i think after your line; 24...Qg5 25. Nxd3 cxd3 and the knight on h6 is lost> After 23.Nh6+ Kf8 24.Nf4 Nxf4 25.Kxf4 Qh4 and it looks like mate is coming, isn't it? (Or ...      Mar-25-26 Jacob Murey    Fusilli: He made GM at 46. Rather late in life, but maybe not so much at the time?      Mar-25-26 J Murey vs V Malakhov, 2000    Fusilli: Wow, this guys knows how to attack. Relentless.      Mar-25-26 Botvinnik vs N Sorokin, 1931    Fusilli: <perf> <So far as I know, in FIDE-rated events one is no longer allowed to write a move on their scoresheet before making it; is this the one exception?> That's an excellent question. And probably not a question we can solely answer based on rules, since the rules are ...      Mar-23-26 F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981    Fusilli: <Mednis may have put in a good word for me with Informant, I don't know. But Informant did publish the game! In the next issue, I was shocked to learn that Informant's panel of judges had also voted it one of the 10 most theoretically important games in Volume 32.> No doubt a ...      Mar-23-26 Kenneth Rogoff    Fusilli: Great to know, <FSR>. I think starting your message the way you did is not just good strategy, but it is kind. You are showing him you care and appreciate his accomplishments. I'm not even 1/100th as famous as Rogoff, but as a university professor at a renowned place, I do get      Mar-22-26 Navara vs Wojtaszek, 2016   Fusilli: <I meant to include that perhaps Black overlooked that after 28...Bxf2+ 29. Kg2, 29...Rd7 would enable 30. Rf1 to be met by 30...Qc5!> That's my guess too. Maybe black played a tad too quickly there. In the old days, one could be really low on time by move 30 and mess up ...      Mar-16-26 Panno vs W Hug, 1973    Fusilli: Fun game.

indicates a reply to the comment.

My Facerook Wall

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 74 OF 122 ·  Later Kibitzing> Dec-02-22    Fusilli: Blitz game, just played on chess.com. I am black. click for larger view White just played 19.Bg5. I played 19...Re3. (You want the exchange? Have the exchange!) 20.Bxe3 Rxe3 21.Rg1 Qe7 22.Rb2 Bh6 23.Qd1? (Necessary was 23.Re1, but you don't want to risk a discovery threat on your queen in blitz.) click for larger view Black to play and win with flair. Dec-02-22    areknames: <Exciting day!> Indeed it was. When CR went 2-1, for a few minutes Japan and Costa Rica were both through which would have constituted the biggest group stage upset in history. Eventually Germany ended up helping Spain but got no help from them in return as the Iberians safely conceded defeat to Japan, and were probably quite happy to face Morocco and avoid Croatia in the next round. <Belgium was quite unlucky> I don't believe luck has a lot to do with the outcome. When you get those kind of chances, REPETEADLY, you just have to score otherwise you don't deserve to win. Dec-02-22    areknames: <Black to play and win with flair> I'm having some trouble visualizing it all but it should be 23...Rxf3+ 24.Ke1 (only move, White can capture on f3 in 3 different ways to no avail) Qe3! with a deadly invasion. Dec-02-22    Fusilli: <areknames: I'm having some trouble visualizing it all but it should be 23...Rxf3+ 24.Ke1 (only move, White can capture on f3 in 3 different ways to no avail) Qe3! with a deadly invasion.> Yup! <I don't believe luck has a lot to do with the outcome. When you get those kind of chances, REPETEADLY, you just have to score otherwise you don't deserve to win.> I concede the point. In fact, barring a biased referee or other decisive external factors, every result is fair. Dec-02-22    Fusilli: <areknames: WORLD CUP TRIVIA> I googled this and found this page: https://colgadosporelfutbol.com/pad... It's in Spanish, but scroll down to the table. There are actually three father-son duos that played for different countries! Dec-02-22    Fusilli: <TD> <technical draw: Does anyone here really believe that Tunisia beat France?> Actually, after seeing the highlights and reading about it, I don't see anything suspicious about it. I think that Deschamps' decision to try Team B was a smart one and a good use of the luxury of having qualified early. It gave some backup players a little bit of exposure, and let him see problems he wouldn't have seen otherwise. To me, France is as much a favorite to win the tournament as it was before that game. Dec-02-22    Fusilli: With both Serbia and Cameroon forced to go for a win, the games today promise to be exciting! Dec-02-22    technical draw: Another VAR intervention. This has got to stop. The WC is becoming unwatchable. Lucky the penalty shot was missed, divine justice. Dec-02-22    technical draw: <I think that Deschamps' decision to try Team B > Then the score should be Tunisia 1 France* 0 Dec-02-22    Fusilli: Of course, Uruguay-Ghana and Korea-Portugal are super exciting too. Dec-02-22    Fusilli: <technical draw: Another VAR intervention. This has got to stop. The WC is becoming unwatchable.> I agree. It's excessive now. I think decisions should not be made on the basis of razor-thin margins anyway. Dec-02-22    technical draw: Again does anyone really believe that South Korea beat Portugal? Dec-02-22    chancho: Well, 2-1. You think the fix was in? Dec-02-22    technical draw: <chancho> <Well, 2-1. You think the fix was in?>. Well, lets just say there are a lot of gamblers happy today. Dec-02-22    technical draw: Caesars Palace odds had South Korea at +330 which means you win $330 for every $100 bet. And Portugal was at -123 which means you had to bet $123 to win $100. So it was a tempting bet to bet on SK. Tutti La Polgaretta knows how to handle bets. Dec-02-22    technical draw: OK, if Cameroon beats Brazil then we will know that the black hand is in the WC. Dec-02-22    technical draw: I'm a psychic. I could have made a fortune. In a meaningless game for one team bet on the other. Dec-03-22    optimal play: <technical draw: OK, if Cameroon beats Brazil then we will know that the black hand is in the WC.> Not too sure about that. The most likely explanation is that Brazil, France & Portugal decided to rest their first string side since they were already guaranteed to progress to the round of 16. It does show however that they don't have a lot of depth. The second string guys obviously didn't impress when given an opportunity. Dec-03-22    technical draw: <op> <The most likely explanation is that Brazil, France & Portugal decided to rest their first string side>. True but that means they were not giving there full effort which can be considered a foul play. Like agreeing to a draw before the game in chess. I think a team should always go out to win no matter the position in the standings. Dec-03-22    Fusilli: <TD> <Like agreeing to a draw before the game in chess.> I'd say that saving energy, and testing different configurations of players, is more like trying an inferior gambit to test the waters instead of playing your stronger home study, which you'd rather save for when you play the champ. I honestly don't see anything wrong with that. The coaches' (and the teams') goal is to move on to the next stage and try to win the tournament. Delivering a good show for the public is secondary to that. Besides, from my experience as a college professor I can tell you that you can *never* make *everyone* happy. Dec-03-22    optimal play: <technical draw: <op> <The most likely explanation is that Brazil, France & Portugal decided to rest their first string side>. True but that means they were not giving there full effort which can be considered a foul play. Like agreeing to a draw before the game in chess. I think a team should always go out to win no matter the position in the standings.> As long as the players who took the field genuinely tried their best to win, then there's no foul play. <Fusilli: <TD> <Like agreeing to a draw before the game in chess.> I'd say that saving energy, and testing different configurations of players, is more like trying an inferior gambit to test the waters instead of playing your stronger home study, which you'd rather save for when you play the champ. I honestly don't see anything wrong with that. The coaches' (and the teams') goal is to move on to the next stage and try to win the tournament. Delivering a good show for the public is secondary to that. Besides, from my experience as a college professor I can tell you that you can *never* make *everyone* happy.> Yes, there's nothing wrong with giving the second string players an opportunity to show their mettle. The coach may need to rely on some of them in the case of injury or poor form with the first string players. With progress to the next stage secured, it's a good idea to give them some game time. The important thing is that they try to win. In these cases however, they flopped, which might be a bit worrying for the coaches. Dec-03-22    moronovich: <optimal play> Good luck tonight! Quite some mountain to climb. But as they say "Impossible is nothing". Dec-03-22    optimal play: Thanks Moro. We're a long shot with nothing to lose. Argentina are expected to win so all the pressure is on them. Dec-03-22    technical draw: Well, I guess I'm in the minority here. But that's academic now since the group stage is over and we now have sudden death and maybe penalty shots to determine the winner. So the "A" teams should show up. Dec-03-22    areknames: LOL, so who does Aussie gk Ryan think he is? Maybe Rene' Higuita, the flamboyant Colombian (remember him?) who was always trying to dribble himself out of trouble at Italia '90 until he was punished by Roger Milla? What a game, it felt like Argentina was safe and in control the whole game but then all of a sudden Australia scores by accident and eventually get their ONLY chance of the game at the last second which Kuol should have converted and sent the game to extra time. Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 122) search thread:    < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 74 OF 122 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.