Exact, 10 points: []
Under, 7 points: [['OhioChessFan', '1-0', '45']]

2nd Under, 6 points: []
3rd Under, 5 points: []
Over, 3 points: []
2nd Over, 2 points: []
3rd Over, 1 point1: []

Exact, 10 points: []
Under, 7 points: [['moulicules', '1-0', '39']]
2nd Under, 6 points: [['OhioChessFan', '1-0', '38']]

3rd Under, 5 points: [['Golden Executive', '1-0', '36']]

Over, 3 points: []
2nd Over, 2 points: [['Robin01', '1-0', '42']]
3rd Over, 1 point1: [['wordfunph', '1-0', '43']]

Perfect # moves predictions for this round goes to:

<none>

Highest scores in the Bonus Ranker: 14 points <OhioChessFan>

Results:

Moves Ranker - Through <Round 8>

Score, UserID, Over, Under, Exact

59, twinlark, 1, 8, 0
52, SwitchingQuylthulg, 1, 7, 0
48, WinKing, 0, 4, 2
45, moulicules, 1, 6, 0
41, NakoSonorense, 0, 3, 2
37, Penguincw, 1, 2, 2
27, Golden Executive, 1, 2, 1
21, OhioChessFan, 0, 3, 0
21, SloVice, 0, 3, 0
20, lostemperor, 1, 1, 1
17, wordfunph, 0, 1, 1
13, Robin01, 1, 0, 1
10, bubuli55, 0, 0, 1
10, chessmoron, 0, 0, 1

===

Bonus Ranker - Through <Round 8>

Score, UserID, 3-Over, 2-Over, 3-Under, 2-Under

69, moulicules, 1, 5, 2, 8
65, OhioChessFan, 0, 5, 5, 5
57, chessmoron, 2, 5, 9, 0
50, SloVice, 1, 2, 3, 5
49, NakoSonorense, 6, 4, 1, 5
48, WinKing, 2, 3, 2, 5
46, Penguincw, 1, 1, 5, 3
46, Golden Executive, 2, 0, 4, 4
45, lostemperor, 1, 2, 2, 5
39, wordfunph, 5, 1, 4, 2
38, Robin01, 3, 5, 5, 0
35, SwitchingQuylthulg, 1, 0, 2, 4
27, twinlark, 1, 5, 2, 1
21, bubuli55, 0, 1, 0, 3

===

Moves+Bonus Ranker - Through <Round 8>

Score, UserID

114, moulicules
96, WinKing
90, NakoSonorense
87, SwitchingQuylthulg
86, OhioChessFan
86, twinlark
83, Penguincw
73, Golden Executive
71, SloVice
67, chessmoron
65, lostemperor
56, wordfunph
51, Robin01
30, bubuli55

===

Moves Ranker (# of 1st place UNDER/OVER/EXACT) - Through <Round 8>

Score,UserID

I have been working for some time on a way to get more members to play your games(all of them). In my forum is an experimental idea that may encourage members to try all of your games. All of you have a list of HOF'ers & I think all members that play your games like it (I know I do). My idea tries to tie all three of your contests together by offering titles just as there are in the game of chess. The only way to get these titles (GM, IM & M) is to participate in all of the contests. Like I said this idea is experimental & could be changed around or scrapped entirely. I would like feedback from all of you to see what you think. I would do all the bookkeeping & keep it up to date.

Sure thing <OCF>. I figure these are what you mean.

<*GM - at least 3 golds in *each of the 3* game contests. (9 Golds minimum)>

I chose three because you need three norms in higher level chess for the GM title - seemed right.

<*IM - at least 2 golds in *each of the 3* game contests. (6 Golds minimum) (Since we have players from all over the world this seems appropriate)>

This one I wasn't sure of <OCF> if it should be 2-2-2 or maybe 3-2-2, 2-3-2, 2-2-3. I figured if you can win 2 games in each of the three contests there's more than luck involved. Definitely negotiable.

<*M - at least 2 golds in 2 of the 3 game contests / or at least 2 golds in one of the 3 game contests & at least 1 gold in the other 2 (4 Golds minimum) --- 6 Golds total (any combo) also = M)>

Thanks < Slo Vice >. I have a feeling this game will be the shortest game of the tourney. I just can't decide whether to put 15 or 19. So I just have it at 1. It has the same look :)