chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Nov-19-25
______________ Moves Prediction Contest

<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.

Chessgames.com tournament page:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Official site: http://

Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/

Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...

***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum

<Format>:

[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]

==4 Different Scoring Methods==

Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])

Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]

Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]

1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]

For example:

<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>

Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45

Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46

Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever

Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #

Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves

Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.

Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.

Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.

<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.

Things To Look At:
1. Game Collection: 1975 World Junior chess championship
2. Ongoing edits Vladimir Ostrogsky
3. Bio Adolf Zytogorski
4. Complete the Olympiad
5. Bio Lorenz Maximilian Drabke

7. Baden-Baden (1870)

11. Karl Mayet
12. Smbat Lputian

Pi Day
rreusser/computing-with-the-bailey-borwein-plouffe-formula">https://observablehq.com/(at)rreusser/...

Pun Index Game Collection: Game of the Day & Puzzle of the Day Collections

>> Click here to see OhioChessFan's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 792 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 49366 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-19-25 W Hug vs Korchnoi, 1978 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: 18. Ne4 opened up the middle to Black's Queen and LSB. 18. Nb1 was fine.
 
   Nov-18-25 Chessgames - Music
 
OhioChessFan: Wow, that is awesome. Here's Alvin Lee in his early days: 10 Years After-Love Like a Man https://youtu.be/K2nsJIjF5E4?si=Iwx...
 
   Nov-18-25 S P Sethuraman vs C Anto, 2025
 
OhioChessFan: <redundant> I never noticed that. I had 5 semesters of college German so I have a basic knowledge of the language. I guess the different languages of "time" in the same sentence render it acceptable. Monty Python just doesn't work for me. I like maybe 10% of their stuff.
 
   Nov-16-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: While I disagree with <al wazir> on much, I acknowledge he's by far the best of the bunch in argumentation.
 
   Nov-14-25 McShane vs I Samunenkov, 2025
 
OhioChessFan: Nice analysis from Mikhail Golubev https://www.chess.com/blog/MikhailG...
 
   Nov-14-25 Mikhail Golubev
 
OhioChessFan: I just played over the Samunenkov game. What do you think of the Petroff in general? Do you need to be booked up on the latest lines or can you just rely on general principles?
 
   Nov-14-25 V Biliy vs V Golovach, 2003
 
OhioChessFan: Wildly entertaining game that lasted a long time with an odd material imbalance. 41...Ke5 was losing, as it gave up the skewer on the two Rooks on the long diagonal. 41...Kd7 would have been fine.
 
   Nov-13-25 D Moody vs D Helf, 1976
 
OhioChessFan: "Dewey, I'm Cut in Helf Pretty Bad"
 
   Nov-12-25 Nakamura vs T Dokka, 2025
 
OhioChessFan: "Dokka Shame"
 
   Nov-12-25 J Bars vs M Hohlbein, 2024 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Wow, what an amazing game to review.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 587 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-18-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: <ocf> I have read little about the JFK assassination but did read "Case Closed" by Gerald Posner. Dumb title aside, I thought it was excellent.

Your opinion?

I agree the Garrisons and Mark Lanes are charlatans.

Mar-18-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Case Closed is great. It's flawed, but still an indispensable work. In particular, its discussion of conspiracy theories in general is very enlightening. I didn't realize that nearly all conspiracy theories are essentially the same template with a few differences thrown in. In any case, that was the book that flipped me from believing in conspiracy to believing it was Oswald alone.

Reclaiming History by Vince Bugliosi is a few million pages long, but worth the read.

Mar-18-17  diceman: <OhioChessFan:

Reclaiming History by Vince Bugliosi is a few million pages long, but worth the read.>

Did you see the Bugliosi/Spence Trial?

Mar-18-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Yes. The cross examination is a foundational way of discovering truth. Spence was smart enough not to put the dingbat Jean Hill on the stand.

For the most part, it's a heart issue, not a mind issue, that keeps people from believing the obvious. I just saw a Posner video where he's asked why 60% of people believe in a conspiracy. He answered that he's surprised it's not 90%.

Mar-19-17  Big Pawn: <OCF: For the most part, it's a heart issue, not a mind issue, that keeps people from believing the obvious.>

We've talked about this before, especially in the context of theism vs atheism debates, and we agree. However, I do think that when we see an example of someone refusing to believe the obvious, what we actually see is them believing the obvious (how can't you?) but refusing to *submit* to it. Pride always rebels against authority and Truth is the authority, so anyone who operates primarily out of a position of pride (or feelings in general) will refuse to *submit*. Another way to think of the word "submit" is repent.

Mar-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: "Case Closed" was excellent and very thorough in my opinion. I particularly liked the way he demolished Jim Garrison. I remmeber when he was making all those charges and he so obviously had nothing at all.

As I remember, Posner thought the evidence it was Oswald alone was overwhelming, but during the Warren Commission investigation the CIA was so devious it made people think something else had happened.

I see it costs $10 on Kindle. Maybe I'll buy it to have it available for checking at any time.

Mar-19-17  Travis Bickle: I'm sure JFK was murdered not by a lone gunman but by an organized conspiracy to murder him that may have been coordinated by The CIA & The Mafia.

There's no way Oswald could have fired that many rounds that quickly with that cheap piece of sh*% rifle.

Jesse Ventura who was a showbiz wrestler to a showboat Governor but was also a Navy Seal simulated the supposed shooting from the book depository. Here's a clip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSW...

Mar-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Why would the conspirators give Oswald a cheap rifle?

If he was framed, why did they frame him with a cheap rifle?

If they had to frame him with a cheap rifle because that is the only one he owned, why didn't they create paperwork to prove he owned a high quality rifle?

Okay, I've run of of possible objections. I'll have a look at the Ventura video later, but it wasn't that tough to do.

Mar-19-17  diceman: <OhioChessFan:

Okay, I've run of of possible objections.>

The rifle "can" be fired that fast.

Mar-19-17  Travis Bickle: <diceman: <OhioChessFan: Okay, I've run of of possible objections.>

The rifle "can" be fired that fast.> Who by you Chickenhawk!

Mar-19-17  YouRang: Oswald did it, but the CIA furnished him with the magic bullets.
Mar-19-17  YouRang: More seriously, I always thought that the most suspicious thing about it was that they paraded JFK around in that convertible in such an unsecurable area..

But ineptitude is always a far more likely explanation for things like this than widespread conspiracies.

I'm sure I haven't investigated the matter as much as <OCF>, but I find the lone gunman explanation to be the most credible. No conspiracy would have been planned like that, including Oswald being killed by Ruby while surrounded by Dallas police. Were the police in on it also?

Mar-19-17  Travis Bickle: Here's an interesting clip with Jack Ruby & Lyndon Johnson speaking on the JFK assassination.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd1...

Mar-19-17  Travis Bickle: CIA agent E. Howard Hunt, Nixon's Rat, speaks on his deathbed about the Kennedy assassination. This tape has been edited down, the original was about 5 minutes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFA...

Mar-19-17  diceman: <Travis Bickle: <diceman: <OhioChessFan: Okay, I've run of of possible objections.>

The rifle "can" be fired that fast.> Who by you Chickenhawk!>

I was thinking Hillary/Obama.
Lots of gun "practice" in Chicago!

Mar-19-17  Travis Bickle: <diceman> Drop by the windy city I'll show you how to shoot... ; P
Mar-19-17  diceman: Funny no one looks at it the other way.
One shot out of 3 probably killed the President. Oswald was 33% "accurate."

Oswald came close to "not" killing Kennedy.

Had JFK (or his wife) had the presence of mind to get him down in the seat, he may have made it. (don't know if the throat wound would have killed him on the way to the hospital)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lcj...

Mar-19-17  diceman: <Travis Bickle: <diceman> Drop by the windy city I'll show you how to shoot... >

Dont worry Trav, I know "chickenhawks"
who could turn you into a screen door.

We could have beer.
(as long as they have a mop available)

Mar-19-17  diceman: <Travis Bickle: <diceman: Dont worry Trav, I know "chickenhawks" who could turn you into a screen door.> What are you pals mercenary's or CIA? LOL! You're full of B.S.>

What's hilarious Trav is how upside down your fruitcake is.

You support the party of gender neutrality as you pretend to be a tough guy.

Heh, heh, lil jiff supports the party you do!
(maybe Trav “shoots” to Blake poems)

You wave the red/white/blue flag of America, as you support the party of fascism, communism, Marxism.

Mar-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Let's settle down on the personal attacks.
Mar-19-17  Travis Bickle: Ohio, I apologize for my rage on your forum. Would you please delete my angry posts. Thanks.
Mar-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: It doesn't bother me a whole lot so I have no lingering concerns. It's just something I prefer not to happen here.
Mar-20-17  diceman: At the end of the day you're all right Trav.

Who else posts Black Sabbath on a regular basis?

Mar-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Anyone else notice there were about 25 posts total in all the forums in the past week?
Mar-21-17  YouRang: <OhioChessFan: Anyone else notice there were about 25 posts total in all the forums in the past week?>

I did notice that yesterday, I posted something in <pgp>'s forum early in the day, and when I checked in later that evening, I was surprised that my post was still the latest one.

I wondered if the site had gone down for most of the day. If not, then I think I may have set some kind of record!

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 849)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 587 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC