chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18634 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 347 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-03-12  King Death: The last sentence of this statement threw me for a loop:

<This statement from Ohio State AD Gene Smith was released by the school early afternoon on Friday:

"I am disappointed that negative references have been made about our football coaches and particularly head coach Urban Meyer regarding recruiting. In our league appropriate protocol, if you have concerns, is to share those concerns with your athletic director. Then your athletic director will make the determination on the appropriate communications from that point forward. The athletic directors in our league are professionals and communicate with each other extremely well. Urban Meyer and his staff have had a compliance conscience since they’ve arrived.">

In my life I've known folks that had consciences that wouldn't let them rest and one or two that were sociopaths, but I never heard of somebody with a "compliance conscience."

Feb-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Here we go (again?) football and chess, read #2.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/201...

Feb-03-12  King Death: <WannaBe> You talkin about that skinny kid from Brooklyn that can play some? That was a nice light angle for a change but they had to find something to fill in the gaps.
Feb-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <King Death> Yeah, that skinny kid, who went to Russia, and played blitz, and they had to call in the big boys. =))
Feb-04-12  playground player: <Esteemed Colleagues> For my first annual anti-Super Bowl rant, see my blog, http://leeduigon.com/
Feb-04-12  Jim Bartle: PiP: In the 70s, when the game was usually awful anyway, my friends and I used to go skiing in the Sierra Nevada. Lift lines would be really long on a typical Sunday, but we would just step onto the lifts on Super Bowl Sunday.
Feb-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: NBC is televising the Super Bowl this year, and our local affiliate is starting their coverage at 6:00 AM. Yes, twelve hours before kick-off. Even the Sunday Morning news show hosted by the Big Time Local Anchor will have a Super Bowl theme.

At my university, students in marketing classes are given the assignment of watching the game and grading the commercials.

The church I attended when young had Sunday evening worship services. On Super Bowl Sunday, these were moved back to mid-afternoon or cancelled completely.

Jay Leno informs us that Americans are expected to eat 1.4 <billion> chicken wings during the game. No wonder chickens can't fly.

Now, I do enjoy watching the game. But my television will be turned off until fifteen minutes after the announced kick-off time. With luck, the first thing I see will be the coin landing on the field, signalling the five commercial warning before the pre-halftime show starts.

Feb-04-12  Jim Bartle: One of my favorite all-time Super Bowl moments was at the first Dallas-Buffalo game in 1992, I think.

The halftime show had taken 40 minutes instead of the usual 20 or so, and Jimmy Johnson was required to be interviewed as the Cowboys came back out, and before the TV guy could even ask a question, Johnson laughed and asked, "Think that halftime was long enough? I almost had to shave again."

Feb-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <playground player> I really shouldn't have gone off on my own rant, since I agree with your main point about society's pressure to conform. But I prefer to put the major responsibility on the individual rather than the institution.

For instance, the candidate who advertises the most is more likely to win an election. But restricting political advertising would not address the problem, which chiefly lies in the attitude of voters who are unwilling to sort through the noise and think for themselves.

Society has a lot to answer for in this regard, but in the end individuals have no excuses and nothing to blame but themselves.

Feb-04-12  Jim Bartle: "But restricting political advertising would not address the problem, which chiefly lies in the attitude of voters who are unwilling to sort through the noise and think for themselves."

An excellent point, though I think the source of funding for all advertising should be known, not hidden.

Feb-04-12  playground player: <Phony Benoni> <Restricting political advertising would not address the problem.> Well, we tried that, didn't we? McCain-Feingold is still on the books, and money still talks in politics.

I would very much like it to be untrue that whoever buys the most advertising, wins the election.

Feb-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <playground player> They've actually studied that point, and it does generally hold true that heavy spenders win elections. Of course, it could be because campaigns that raise more money were better organized in the first place. But that may be a rose-colored view.

As for McCain-Feingold and such ilk, I am reminded of a story of the day when The Tyrannical Monarch granted an audience to the Inventor. The Inventor took a vial of powder out of a pocket and said, "Lo, O mighty king! This Irresistible Gunpowder will make your weapons invincible!"

The king said, "I must have this gunpowder!", and tossed a gold pouch to the inventor.

The inventor drew a vial from another pocket and said, "Lo, O mighty king!" This Invulnerability Powder, sprinkled over your ramparts, will render the Irresistible Gunpowder harmless!"

The king said, "I must have this powder!" and tossed another pouch of gold.

The inventor reached into yet another pocket, pulled out yet another vial, and said, "Lo, O Mighty King! When added to the Irresistible Gunpowder, this substance will render the Invulnerability Powder useless!"

The king called to his guards. "Search this man and tell me how many pockets he has." After a couple of hours, they reported back: "Your Majesty, we are but humble products of the local school system and cannot count that high."

As this point an axe comes into play and things get rather messy, so I think it best to skip to the dual moral:

1) People are incredibly inventive at finding ways to do what they want;

2) Tyrannical Monarchs have no sense of humor.

Feb-04-12  Shams: <They've actually studied that point, and it does generally hold true that heavy spenders win elections>

Adding to that: I believe this holds true up to a certain point of saturation. Past that point, a very heavy spender has I think a negligible edge over a merely heavy spender.

Of course, the saturation point is still a very expensive point to reach, and as long as TV buys remain the most prominent form of electoral carpet bombing that seems unlikely to change.

Feb-05-12  King Death: The game tonight is just for show:

http://eye-on-football.blogs.cbsspo...

Feb-05-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Dewey Defeats Truman.

Whatever Giants PR Idiot thought of this is likely to find themselves without a job in another 24 hours.

Feb-05-12  Shams: Happens all the time, a page propagates to the production servers (i.e. the live site) before it should. A non-story from a tech perspective.

How about the Patriots releasing Tiquan Underwood the day before the Super Bowl? That is ruthless. What I don't understand is, the team said they wanted to carry an extra Defensive Tackle-- but aren't only 46 players active for game day anyway? That doesn't change for the Super Bowl, does it? Why can't Underwood just be inactive?

Feb-05-12  King Death: <Shams> Underwood went out with his head held high though and that's more common sense than we see out of a lot of folks in public today. Give them Twitter and they become dopes.

You all may remember the social commentator Cappie Pondexter last year: http://www.bvonsports.com/2011/03/1...

Feb-05-12  Shams: Sounds like they needed to call up a DT from the Practice Squad, so merely making Underwood inactive would not have helped.
Feb-05-12  King Death: Here's one for anybody who thinks Scott Boras always gets the job done for his clients: Matt Harrington.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_H...

Harrington was really lucky, he had two greedy agents.

Feb-05-12  playground player: <Phony Benoni> Your story reminds me of a story from Plutarch.

Pyrrhus the conqueror (for whom the Pyrrhic victory is named), having just conquered most of Greece, was discussing his plans with the old philosopher. "I'm going to cross the Adriatic Sea and conquer Rome and Italy," he bragged. "And then what?" asked the philosopher.

"After Rome, I'll cross the sea and conquer Carthage."

"And then what, sire?"

"Sicily, I think. Then Spain."

"And then?"

"Asia, perhaps. Or Egypt."

"And then, sire?"

"Well, I suppose then I'll come home and rest."

"Sire," said the old man, "why don't we just stay here at home and start resting now?"

Feb-05-12  Jim Bartle: I believe Krupp Industries actually did something similar in the early part of the century.

They'd invent an armor-piercing shell, then armor to resist those shells, then shells to pierce that armor, again and again. And apparently they had a lot of it ready well before bringing it out for sale.

Feb-05-12  Jim Bartle: An up-and-coming golfer this year is named John Huh. Headline writers must be salivating at the opportunities to come.
Feb-05-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: My brain says Giants, but my gut ain't buying it.

Two things to watch. Throughout the playoffs, the Patriots have been playing a big gamble defense. They stop many plays for losses, but also give up a lot of big gainers.

They could get away with this against relatively weak offensive teams like Denver and Baltimore. Will Eli Manning be able to exploit the openings, or will the Giants revert to midseason form?

Defensively, the Giants have to get to Brady. They've got the front four to do it, but it's not a sure bet.

This could well be decided early. If one team gets a substantial lead--say three scores ahead--I don't see the other coming back simply because that gap will probably indicate defensive dominance.

Feb-05-12  Jim Bartle: Also, Manning has a habit of not playing real well for the first three quarters, then going nuts in the fourth.

I agree that the Giants have a tremendous pass rush. Oddly they didn't do much against SF, but the Giants still won.

Feb-05-12  Jim Bartle: I didn't think you'd get intentional grounding for a long pass down the field. The QB can say, reasonably, that that's where the receiver was supposed to be, but wasn't.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 347 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC