chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18634 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-24-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <playgrund player> None at all. I'd be perfectly happy if it just kept score and compiled the stats for me; those chores are what ususally made me quit.
Jun-25-09  playground player: <Phony Benoni> I can't believe I used to sit there and compile ERAs without even a pocket calculator! I must've been going through a rough patch in life. Still, it was fascinating to see how close they were to "real life" (if baseball can be said to be real life).

<To Whom It May Concern> Anyone in here ever play in a Chess 960 (Fischerrandom) tournament? A friend of mine wants to set one up on his internet site, and has asked me to inquire among the CG community. Do they arrange it so that all pairs of players have to play with the same random arrangement of pieces, so as to equalize matters (as in duplicate bridge, where all teams have to play the same hands so that their scores can be compared meaningfully)?

Of course, it has been eons since I played duplicate bridge. They've probably changed it--brought in a designated hitter or something.

Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <playground player> I played in a few blitz Chess 960 tournaments on ICC, and believe that each game started with a unique position. There was certainly no comparison of results between White only and Black only, as there would be in duplicate bridge.

I played a bit of dupoicate myself years ago, even picking up one-seventh of a Master point. But it's not my game. What I hate is being yelled at by my partner--and even my opponents--for being an idiot. Even if I'm sure I made the right play, they still yell at me and I'll take it. No fun at all.

My father, who was a computer operator back in the 1950s (yes, the <1950s>) once brought home an old manual adding maching. No electricity. No tape. You just punched the keys and the answers showed up in little windows at the bottom.

You could only do addition, but I managed to figure out a way to efficiently calculate batting averages with it. I could proably describe the process, but it doesn't seem worth the time.

Jun-25-09  Jim Bartle: I was the umpire for a six-team Pony League back before hand-held calculators came out. One night I took all the scorecards home and figured the stats.

The kids were all over it, looking at every detail. And what was interesting was that many of the flashiest players, the hardest throwers and most powerful hitters, did not have the best records. They looked good, but less impressive-looking but more efficient players were better.

Jun-25-09  Deus Ex Alekhina: I have some good news & some bad news for all you Cubs fans. First, the good news: the Cubs will be in the World Series!! Now the bad news: they will be playing the Tigers.
Jun-25-09  Travis Bickle: <Deus Ex Alekhina> If you think The Cubs will be in The Series you are drunker than a monkey!
Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: On Tuesday, Maggio Ordonez returned from a wee-long "benching", and went 0 for 3.

Wednesday afternoon, before the game, he had his famous flowing locks cut off. That night, he got two hits.

Today, he hit his first home run since April.

I expect the Tigers to announce the hiring of a new team barber tomorrow morning.

Jun-25-09  Jim Bartle: A wee-long benching? That sounds like about two minutes.
Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: We have got to get a spell checker around here. There have been too many goof-ups by our local wizards and sorceresses.
Jun-25-09  Jim Bartle: Goblins.
Jun-25-09  Jim Bartle: My favorite typo was on the Karpov page, where somebody was arguing he was the equal of Kasparov because he was doing well in a match:

"Karpov was in the lad until..."

Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Believe it or not, library catalogs have typos as well. There's even a discussion list devoted to the topic.

Yesterday, typos on the spelling of Ernest Hemingway's name came up, particularly "Hemmingway". I mangaed to find a couple of examples where the letter "w" was left out.

But my favorite library typo of all time came in a catalog record for a segment from The Flintstones television show. It was called "Little Bamm-Bamm", and someone had written this summary.

<Tells how Wilma and Barney got their son, Bamm-Bamm.>

Wilma, you'll remember, was married to Fred.

Jun-25-09  Jim Bartle: Maybe there was a reason Fred got tossed out along with Dino every night.
Jun-25-09  Travis Bickle: <Phony Benoni: I mangaed..(managed)Spell Check haha!
Jun-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Jim Bartle: While moving I found a copy of the Bill James book on managers, which I not only didnt know I had, I didnt even know existed.

In any case, he had a rough rating system for managers, based on certain benchmarks for each season. In 1997 LaRussa rated No. 31 all-time, but a quick calculation shows him at No. 6 now, the only manager in the top ten from the past forty years. Didnt check Bobby Cox, though.>

Who was #1? Joe McCarthy? I seem to remember reading somewhere that James was very high on him. Any other surprises? How did Connie Mack rate? I'm curious because I think he wound up with a losing record overall...but would rate very high if he had retired in 1914 or so.

Jun-26-09  Jim Bartle: The list was largely based on longevity, and only includes positives, no points lost for negatives. Here's the top ten: McGraw, Mack, McCarthy, Stengel, Alston, Sparky Anderson, Weaver, Harry Wright, Durocher, McKechnie.

This was from 1996. LaRussa and Cox would now be rated #6 to 8.

Jun-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: By the way, this is a great forum, <Phony Benoni>. I had better stay away from here.
Jun-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Interesting that of James' top ten, McGraw was probably the best player as well as the #1 manager. It's rare for great players to become great managers.
Jun-26-09  Jim Bartle: Well, what about Maury Wills then?

I should emphasize that James' list was just a summary of the accomplishments of each manager's teams. He wasn't trying to say these were the top ten managers of all time.

He gave one point for each season with: a winning record; 20 games over .500; 100 wins; division championship; pennant winner; and World Series winner.

So a team with a 100-win season which won the Series would receive 6 points, while a 92-70 season coming in second would get 2 points.

Jun-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Thanks for the clarification. The one criterion I might question is the extra point for division champion. which seems an unfair advantage for current teams. Still there were a good selection of pre-division managers in the top ten.

How Harry Wright got in boggles my mind. He managed from 1871-1895, which meant no post-season play. And for a good portion of that time, his teams didn't even play 100 games in a year.

By the way, I tried to figure out Joe Toree and got a total of 55. How does that rate?

Jun-26-09  Jim Bartle: 55 points would put Torre 4th, behind McCarthy's 71 and ahead of Stengel at 52 and Alston at 51.

James justifies including the division championships by saying there are many more teams today, and thus more competition.

Jun-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Well, I'm not one to argue with Bill James.

But now I'm trying to figure out how Casey Stengel got 52. Here's his managerial record:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/m...

Winning record: 13 (Braves 1937, Yankees 1949-1960)

20 games over .500: 11 (1949-1958, 1960)

100+ wins: 1 (1954)

Pennants: 10 (1949-1953, 1955-1958, 1960)

World Series: 7 (1949-1953, 1956, 1858)

That adds up to 42 in my book. If you count each pennant as a division win as well, that would make 52.

Jun-26-09  Jim Bartle: Looks like you're right. I'm trying to read the text, see where either he screwed up or I got the rules wrong.

I think he made a mistake, as he says winning the World Series without winning 100 games is worth 5 points, though by his rules that would be 4 points before the divisions exist.

42 points would only drop him into a tie for 6th with Earl Weaver and Harry Wright, being passed by Alston and Sparky Anderson.

Jun-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Just did Joe McCarthy, who has 71 points:

Winning 22
20+ 18
100+ 6
Pennant 9
World Series 7

That's 62; add nine for pennants as division champs, and you get 71. Looks like that's definitely what he's doing.

Jun-26-09  Jim Bartle: Yikes! Mets infield commits three errors in the second inning vs. the Yankees.

This after last week, when their second baseman dropped A-Rod's easy popup with two down in the ninth, turning an 8-7 win into a 9-8 loss in five seconds.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC