I am a friend of <rdb>

Here is a message from <rdb>

<Why am I unable to access chessgames.com for last few days ?

I get the message ' 403 forbidden' .

Thank you . Regards 🙏 🙏 >

I have tried different browsers - 3 different browsers - but problem is persisting

I am having withdrawal symptoms by now - it has been several days now . Cg.com is my only addiction now - I do not drink coffee/tea , no tobacco/alcohol/drugs ....I just like to imbibe cg.com every day . And it has been several days now . Withdrawal symptoms ....I would need to increase level of my meditation dtastically if I do not start getting my daily dose of cg.com soon .

Regards 🙏🙏

Something is off with my wi/fi.

Thank you .

Regards 🙏 🙏>

The Integrity is not George Wallace. Can you prove this?>
chessgames.com chessforum (kibitz #41104)

Since you asked...

I don't have access to the server logs, so no IP or timestamps from the posts - which provides cover but doesn't protect him from betraying his true identity.

I will spare you the many circumstantial arguments based on the evidence, which I definitely view as conclusive, but a bit long winded.

Instead a simple google search reveals Z-truth:

Google <"you libs" site:chessgames.com>

A simple search on his simple favorite invective finds him betraying himself.

There are only four hits, revealing the sock puppet (d)evolution:

<bippy> = <The Integrity> = <George Wallace> = <Big Pawn>

Details here: Kenneth Rogoff (kibitz #37598)

* * * * *

I begrudgingly acknowledge that <bippy> is very good at maintaining a facade for extended periods, but he always betrays himself in the end (once when he mistakenly used the wrong sock when multi-plexing).>

That is a very , very intelligent post - sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson would be impressed .

However , may be we should have this conversation in the forum of <Susan freeman> and/or <rogoff> forum ....

Now , it is not my place to say this , strictly speaking , because I am not admin/owner ..... ....
..however , I think, either this conversation will die on its own (and I do not want that ) or if it does not die out but rather blossoms , then admins would ask to move it to some other forum and therefore , I am moving it to the forum of <Susan freeman> and <rogoff> forum.

Is <the integrity> sock puppet of <big pawn>/<George wallace > ? If yes , should he be banned because <gw>/<bp> is banned or should he be allowed to make a mockery of guidelines of cg.com and thus insult/mock cg.com so blatantly and intensely or may be he should be forgiven because he behaving now but if so then should that not be done transparently, overtly , explicitly instead of this ridiculous farce ? 😆😆😆

Discuss .

Very convincing .

Will it be correct to say that everyone knows that <the integrity> is <big pawn>/<George wallace> ?

I mean if you say that the conclusive proof would be had only if we match finger prints , dna and such of these two people .... . .....
. Well, short of that , everyone knows that <the integrity > is <big pawn>/<George wallace> . Correct ?

Very convincing .

Will it be correct to say that everyone knows that <the integrity> is <big pawn>/<George wallace> ?

I mean if you say that the conclusive proof would be had only if we match finger prints , dna and such of these two people .... . .....
Well, short of that , everyone knows that <the integrity > is <big pawn>/<George wallace> . Correct ?

In the real world , every one has unique finger prints.

In rogoff world , everyone has a unique writing style . It is impossible to hide one's style - well almost impossible .

<big pawn>/<George wallace> has In the past tried to hide his style when using sock puppets but he was caught every time . He can not hide his writing style no matter how hard he tries.

Now , in addition to his writing style , there are other things as <willber g> points out - <Same phrases, same ideas, same writing style, familiar with members' posting histories, dives straight into Rogoff picking up where he left off as <GW>>

Come on ! Let us not kid ourselves 😆😆

If you people say that <the integrity> is not <big pawn>/<George wallace> , that insults our intelligence. And that would mean that we not acting on the principle of mutual respect as we thought. We respect admins but admins do not respect us. It is like <alex jones> knowing that his audience are idiots , so he makes money by feeding misinformation to them about sandy hookes murders and such ....

Now , what is <the integrity> up to ?

He is trying to prove that people get offended by his ideas and not by his abusiveness . So , he trying to be as civil as he possibly can be - and he slipping often , nonetheless , he order of magnitude more civil than before ...

That is what I told these guys. I told them that I am taking this conversation to rogoff forum and/or <Susan freeman> forum.

Now , some of these people often ask me - <"hey , <rdb> , why do admins/owners like and respect you so much">

And I tell them <" you guys asking wrong question. Admins/owner like/respect you people too. Like any mature business , in cg.com too customers are treated like royalty - with respect and indulgence . Question that you need to ask is - <rdb> , why do you respect admins/owner so much ? And my answer is - I do that because that is what grown up , mature , civilised people do . I always insist on working in an atmosphere of mutual respect. It is not just admins/owner , I treat everyone with utmost respect and civility , in general . What is more , very often , I turn other cheek too when I am disrespected ">

So , guys , we should not behave like 12 year olds . Do unto others what you want others do to you . We should give as much respect to admins/owner as we want from them . We should follow the rules. We should not have 'off topic ' conversations in chessgames.com user support forum.

What did you say? You saying <<rdb> should not lecture us ...he ain't admin , it is not his place to mouth this lecture to us ...he should shut up and mind his own business > ?

Touché...mea culpa ...I would shut up now ...thank you for listening to me and indulging me this once . Do what you got to do , guys ...

Search Kibitzing

Search Kibitzing

<Dec-03-23 stone free or die: <Yes, yes FTB is a "real piece of work." > Scat dat.

Dec-03-23 stone free or die: Fzed on tiltz... scat dat.>

Anybody who thinks "scat dat" is an intelligent, worthwhile response is quite mistaken.

<Dec-03-23
perfidious: The hypocrisy of <ursus banalus> is, as <Cassandro> noted, a piece of work--he lays into <zed> for twice posting what he--in his presumed role of site monitor--deems less than worthwhile content, and posts thrice to make that nonexistent point.>

OK, this is funny - i.e. <FtB> thought his post was humorous.

If CGs wants to get off their ass and do something about OFF-TOPIC POSTING as the whistle has been blown 10,000 times on the topic of OFF-TOPIC POSTING on the game pages, you need to LOOK NO FURTHER than the TROLL on this page who operated 50 sockies to do just that, and still does that.

Oh, I'll provide examples of OFF-TOPIC.

This is clearly just more BEAR HUNTING. CGs isn't being fair at all.

For starters, this is OFF-TOPIC:

<<Dec-03-23 stone free or die: <Yes, yes FTB is a "real piece of work." > Scat dat.

Dec-03-23 stone free or die: Fzed on tiltz... scat dat.>

Anybody who thinks "scat dat" is an intelligent, worthwhile response is quite mistaken.

<Dec-03-23
perfidious: The hypocrisy of <ursus banalus> is, as <Cassandro> noted, a piece of work--he lays into <zed> for twice posting what he--in his presumed role of site monitor--deems less than worthwhile content, and posts thrice to make that nonexistent point.>>

Why wasn't this trash removed??? There's not a damn thing about chess or Hans Niemann or humor in there.

Oh yes, there's plenty of targeting FTB. I would know.

Off topic posting ? ? ? Here's deliberate off-topic posting on the chess pages:

Tournament of Peace (2023) (kibitz #131)

Catholics, Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses have a lot of things they invented - but that's not what the scriptures say>

Who told you this ? <big pawn> ? You should not exchange emails with <big pawn>

You won't believe the kind of things <big pawn> said in this forum before he was banned .

<big pawn> says that catholics are not Christians. Can you believe it ? Hahaha. 🙂🙂

What comedy 😀😀

Tell him <cormier> . Tell him that Catholics are Christians. And somebody bring back <optimal play> . He was a very fine Catholic Christian. His epic fights with <big pawn> on the subject <catholics are christians> are stuff of legends. He was hero pop corn sellers . Ever since <big pawn> was banned and <optimal play> stopped posting , many pop corn sellers have declared bankruptcy.

Humans made those decisions. Humans wrote those books. "Properly inspired by God" is the cheap reason given to explain why the chosen books were included.>

That is very interesting post .

Someone help me here, if you please.

'Properly inspired by God ' - this phrase used by <check it out > ....how do we know if some words are divine words/wisdom ? Are words of Koran divine words/wisdom ? Are words of any scriptures other than christian scriptures divine words/wisdom ?